Experimental Self-Characterization of Quantum Measurements.

The accurate and reliable description of measurement devices is a central problem in both observing uniquely nonclassical behaviors and realizing quantum technologies from powerful computing to precision metrology. To date quantum tomography is the prevalent tool to characterize quantum detectors. However, such a characterization relies on accurately characterized probe states, rendering reliability of the characterization lost in circular argument. Here we report a self-characterization method of quantum measurements based on reconstructing the response range-the entirety of attainable measurement outcomes, eliminating the reliance on known states. We characterize two representative measurements implemented with photonic setups and obtain fidelities above 99.99% with the conventional tomographic reconstructions. This initiates range-based techniques in characterizing quantum systems and foreshadows novel device-independent protocols of quantum information applications.

[1]  Gustavo Lima,et al.  Device-Independent Certification of a Nonprojective Qubit Measurement. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[2]  Armin Tavakoli,et al.  Self-testing quantum states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario , 2018, Physical Review A.

[3]  Brian J. Smith,et al.  Local mapping of detector response for reliable quantum state estimation , 2014, Nature Communications.

[4]  Guang-Can Guo,et al.  Experimental realisation of generalised qubit measurements based on quantum walks , 2015, 1501.05096.

[5]  Zdenek Hradil,et al.  Self-calibration for self-consistent tomography , 2012 .

[6]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[7]  E. Wigner,et al.  Book Reviews: Group Theory. And Its Application to the Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra , 1959 .

[8]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[9]  Mohamed Bourennane,et al.  Experimental device-independent tests of classical and quantum dimensions , 2011, Nature Physics.

[10]  Luis L. Sánchez-Soto,et al.  COMPLETE CHARACTERIZATION OF ARBITRARY QUANTUM MEASUREMENT PROCESSES , 1999 .

[11]  Zhu Cao,et al.  Quantum random number generation , 2015, npj Quantum Information.

[12]  Michele Dall'Arno,et al.  Experimental semi-device-independent tests of quantum channels , 2018, Quantum Science and Technology.

[13]  Chi-Kwong Li,et al.  Discontinuity of maximum entropy inference and quantum phase transitions , 2014, 1406.5046.

[14]  Rong Zhang,et al.  Realization of Single-Qubit Positive-Operator-Valued Measurement via a One-Dimensional Photonic Quantum Walk. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[15]  Ying Li,et al.  Modeling Quantum Devices and the Reconstruction of Physics in Practical Systems. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[16]  E. Knill,et al.  A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics , 2001, Nature.

[17]  D. Kaszlikowski,et al.  Minimal qubit tomography , 2004, quant-ph/0405084.

[18]  Hugo Zbinden,et al.  Megahertz-Rate Semi-Device-Independent Quantum Random Number Generators Based on Unambiguous State Discrimination , 2016, 1612.06566.

[19]  Hugo Zbinden,et al.  Self-testing quantum random number generator. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[20]  K J Resch,et al.  Time-reversal and super-resolving phase measurements. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[21]  Arun Sehrawat.  Deriving quantum constraints and tight uncertainty relations , 2017 .

[22]  Joseph M. Renes,et al.  Symmetric informationally complete quantum measurements , 2003, quant-ph/0310075.

[23]  Wen-Hao Zhang,et al.  Experimentally Robust Self-testing for Bipartite and Tripartite Entangled States. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[24]  Umesh V. Vazirani,et al.  Classical command of quantum systems , 2013, Nature.

[25]  N. Brunner,et al.  Experimental estimation of the dimension of classical and quantum systems , 2011, Nature Physics.

[26]  Francesco Buscemi,et al.  Device-independent tests of quantum channels , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  Jens Eisert,et al.  Tomography of quantum detectors , 2009 .

[28]  T. Rudolph,et al.  Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information , 2006, quant-ph/0610030.

[29]  Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano,et al.  Quantum calibration of measurement instrumentation. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[30]  Michele Dall'Arno,et al.  Device-Independent Tests of Quantum Measurements. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[31]  Lee A. Rozema,et al.  Self-calibrating quantum state tomography , 2011, Frontiers in Optics 2011/Laser Science XXVII.

[32]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[33]  F. Buscemi,et al.  Data-driven inference, reconstruction, and observational completeness of quantum devices , 2018, Physical Review A.

[34]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  Quantum cryptography with imperfect apparatus , 1998, Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280).

[35]  Paweł Kurzyński,et al.  Quantum walk as a generalized measuring device. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[36]  D. Berry,et al.  Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation , 2007, Nature.

[37]  W. Wootters,et al.  Optimal state-determination by mutually unbiased measurements , 1989 .

[38]  Brian J. Smith,et al.  Mapping coherence in measurement via full quantum tomography of a hybrid optical detector , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[39]  G. Milburn,et al.  Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits , 2005, quant-ph/0512071.