A Human-in-the Loop Evaluation of a Coordinated Arrival Departure Scheduling Operations for Managing Departure Delays at LaGuardia Airport

LaGuardia (LGA) departure delay was identified by the stakeholders and subject matter experts as a significant bottleneck in the New York metropolitan area. Departure delay at LGA is primarily due to dependency between LGA's arrival and departure runways: LGA departures cannot begin takeoff until arrivals have cleared the runway intersection. If one-in one-out operations are not maintained and a significant arrival-to-departure imbalance occurs, the departure backup can persist through the rest of the day. At NASA Ames Research Center, a solution called "Departure-sensitive Arrival Spacing" (DSAS) was developed to maximize the departure throughput without creating significant delays in the arrival traffic. The concept leverages a Terminal Sequencing and Spacing (TSS) operations that create and manage the arrival schedule to the runway threshold and added an interface enhancement to the traffic manager's timeline to provide the ability to manually adjust inter-arrival spacing to build precise gaps for multiple departures between arrivals. A more complete solution would include a TSS algorithm enhancement that could automatically build these multi-departure gaps. With this set of capabilities, inter-arrival spacing could be controlled for optimal departure throughput. The concept was prototyped in a human-in-the- loop (HITL) simulation environment so that operational requirements such as coordination procedures, timing and magnitude of TSS schedule adjustments, and display features for Tower, TRACON and Traffic Management Unit could be determined. A HITL simulation was conducted in August 2014 to evaluate the concept in terms of feasibility, controller workload impact, and potential benefits. Three conditions were tested, namely a Baseline condition without scheduling, TSS condition that schedules the arrivals to the runway threshold, and TSS+DSAS condition that adjusts the arrival schedule to maximize the departure throughput. The results showed that during high arrival demand period, departure throughput could be incrementally increased under TSS and TSS+DSAS conditions without compromising the arrival throughput. The concept, operational procedures, and summary results were originally published in ATM20151 but detailed results were omitted. This paper expands on the earlier paper to provide the detailed results on throughput, conformance, safety, flight time/distance, etc. that provide extra insights into the feasibility and the potential benefits on the concept.

[1]  Zheng Tao,et al.  Automated Integration of Arrival/Departure Schedules , 2013 .

[2]  Lynne Martin,et al.  Evaluation of the Terminal Sequencing and Spacing system for Performance-Based Navigation arrivals , 2013, 2013 IEEE/AIAA 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[3]  Lynne Martin,et al.  Design and Evaluation of the Terminal Area Precision Scheduling and Spacing System , 2011 .

[4]  Jeffrey Homola,et al.  Reducing Departure Delays at LaGuardia Airport with Departure-Sensitive Arrival Spacing (DSAS) Operations , 2015 .

[5]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Design and evaluation , 1995 .

[6]  Todd J. Callantine TRAC Trial Planning and Scenario Generation to Support Super-Density Operations Studies , 2009 .

[7]  Thomas Prevot,et al.  Human-In-the-Loop Evaluation of NextGen Concepts in the Airspace Operations Laboratory , 2010 .

[8]  A J Tattersall,et al.  An experimental evaluation of instantaneous self-assessment as a measure of workload. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[9]  Paul Lee,et al.  Improving departure throughput by dynamically adjusting inter-arrival spacing , 2014, 2014 IEEE/AIAA 33rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[10]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[11]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[12]  Thom Baguley,et al.  Calculating and graphing within-subject confidence intervals for ANOVA , 2012, Behavior research methods.