Comparison of artificial neural network and Bayesian belief network in a computer-assisted diagnosis scheme for mammography

Artificial neural networks (ANN) have been widely used in computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) schemes as a classification tool to identify abnormalities in digitized mammograms. Because of certain limitations of ANNs, some investigators argue that Bayesian belief network (BBN) may exhibit higher performance. In this study we compared the performance of an ANN and a BBN used in the same CAD scheme. The common databases and the same genetic algorithm (GA) were used to optimize both networks. The experimental results demonstrated that using GA optimization, the performance of the two networks converged to the same level in detecting masses from digitized mammograms. Therefore, in this study we concluded that improving the performance of CAD schemes might be more dependent on optimization of feature selection and diversity of training database than on any particular machine classification paradigm.

[1]  Chris Price Prime time freeware for AI: by Mark Kantrowitz. Prime Time Freeware, Sunnyvale, CA, U.S.A. (1994). 220 pp. $60. ISBN: 1-881957-11-X , 1995 .

[2]  Y H Chang,et al.  Adequacy testing of training set sample sizes in the development of a computer-assisted diagnosis scheme. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[3]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  A novel approach to microcalcification detection using fuzzy logic technique , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  David Gur,et al.  Application of a Bayesian belief network in a computer-assisted diagnosis scheme for mass detection , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[5]  L P Clarke,et al.  Digital mammography: computer-assisted diagnosis method for mass detection with multiorientation and multiresolution wavelet transforms. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[6]  Y H Chang,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single-image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[7]  M Kallergi,et al.  Evaluating the performance of detection algorithms in digital mammography. , 1999, Medical physics.

[8]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Effects of sample size on classifier design for computer-aided diagnosis , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[9]  J. M. Pruneda,et al.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. , 1994, Radiology.

[10]  E. Shortliffe,et al.  An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems. , 1981, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[11]  Y H Chang,et al.  Incorporation of a set enumeration trees-based classifier into a hybrid computer-assisted diagnosis scheme for mass detection. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[12]  Joachim Diederich Explanation and Artificial Neural Networks , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[13]  Martin P. DeSimio,et al.  Computer-aided breast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of Gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  P Haddawy,et al.  Construction of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer , 1997, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[15]  K Doi,et al.  An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. , 1996, Medical physics.

[16]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Variations in measured performance of CAD schemes due to database composition and scoring protocol , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[17]  M. Giger,et al.  Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  H P Chan,et al.  Image feature selection by a genetic algorithm: application to classification of mass and normal breast tissue. , 1996, Medical physics.

[19]  K Doi,et al.  Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. , 1994, Medical physics.

[20]  C E Floyd,et al.  The Effect of Data Sampling on the Performance Evaluation of Artificial Neural Networks in Medical Diagnosis , 1997, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[21]  Ling Guan,et al.  Automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films , 1999, J. Electronic Imaging.