Predictors of newborn admission after labour induction at term: Bishop score, pre-induction ultrasonography and clinical risk factors.

INTRODUCTION Following labour induction at term, 12 percent of neonates can expected to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. We aimed to evaluate the Bishop score, pre-induction ultrasonography (US) assessment of amniotic fluid, foetal weight and cervical length, and pre-induction and intrapartum risk factors as predictors of neonatal admission. METHODS 152 women at term, scheduled for labour induction, consented to participate in this prospective study. Transabdominal US was performed to obtain foetal biometry and amniotic fluid index, followed by transvaginal US to measure cervical length. US findings were concealed. The Bishop score was obtained at initiation of labour induction. Pre-induction and intrapartum risk factors were also considered in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. All study women received standard care. RESULTS On univariate analysis, factors associated with neonatal admission were: gestational age at less than or equal to 40 weeks, labour induction for diabetes mellitus, Bishop score of less than 5 at initiation of labour induction, estimated foetal weight of less than 2.5 kg by US, induction to delivery interval of more than 24 hours, caesarean delivery and umbilical cord blood pH of less than 7.1. Cervical length of greater than 20 mm on transvaginal US (p-value is 0.10) was not significant. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, controlling for the significant variables, only the unfavourable Bishop score (adjusted OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.2-13.8; p-value is 0.02) and caesarean delivery (adjusted OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.1-13.7; p-value is 0.035) were independent predictors of neonatal admission. CONCLUSION The identification of an unfavourable Bishop score as an independent predictor of neonatal admission is useful in the counselling of women who are considering labour induction.

[1]  Y. Khader,et al.  Induction of labor and perinatal outcome: the impact of the amniotic fluid index. , 2006, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[2]  R. Omar,et al.  Clinical and Ultrasound Parameters to Predict the Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  J. Hiller,et al.  Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  E. S. van den Akker,et al.  Bishop Score and Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  M. Hod,et al.  Mode of delivery in pregnancies with suspected fetal growth restriction following induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandin E2 , 2004, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  The usefulness of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid in predicting adverse outcome in prolonged pregnancy: a prospective blinded observational study , 2003, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  R. Filly,et al.  Adverse Birth Outcomes in Relation to Prenatal Sonographic Measurements of Fetal Size , 2003, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[8]  J. Dornan,et al.  A Randomized Trial Using Ultrasound to Identify the High‐Risk Fetus in a Low‐Risk Population , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[10]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Cervical assessment at the routine 23‐week scan: standardizing techniques , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  M Burger,et al.  Measurement of the pregnant cervix by transvaginal sonography: an interobserver study and new standards to improve the interobserver variability , 1997, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[12]  A. Chang,et al.  Prediction of Caesarean Section from Ultrasound and Clinical Assessment of Fetal Size , 1994, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[13]  W. Tweed,et al.  Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit--a retrospective review. , 1992, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[14]  P. Broussard,et al.  Amniotic fluid volume assessment with the four-quadrant technique at 36-42 weeks' gestation. , 1987, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[15]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. , 1984, Radiology.