Original research articleEnergy model, boundary object and societal lens: 35 years of the MARKAL model in the UK

Technical energy models operate within social systems and those that perform particular social as well as technical functions are more likely to be used. We illustrate this with the example of the MARKAL energy system model in the UK, a model that is also widely used internationally. In the UK, MARKAL modelling has a long history helping underpin government energy and climate policy. We trace the use of the model from its initial development in the mid-1970s to the present day, highlighting attributes that contribute to its role as a successful ‘boundary object’ for different but interconnecting energy policy communities. We suggest that changing images of the energy policy problem have enabled MARKAL to shift from an initial role in identifying technologies to reduce oil dependency to playing a key role in target-oriented climate policy. Furthermore, we argue that the ability of MARKAL to perform different roles for different groups has served to embed and institutionalise the model in the energy policy community. Moreover, the capacity of the model to represent detailed technology options has accorded with a technological focus that has suited prevailing, shared conceptions of the energy-climate policy problem.

[1]  A Science of Mars or of Venus , 1987 .

[2]  E. Endo.  Market penetration analysis of fuel cell vehicles in japan by using the energy system model MARKAL , 2007 .

[3]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  UK Energy Policy 1980-2010: A history and lessons to be learnt , 2012 .

[4]  Clark A. Miller.  Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime , 2001 .

[5]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[6]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[7]  Chen Wenying,et al.  The future of natural gas consumption in Beijing, Guangdong and Shanghai: An assessment utilizing MARKAL , 2008 .

[8]  Wolf Häfele,et al.  A technical appraisal of the IIASA energy scenarios? A rebuttal , 1986 .

[9]  Alan H. Bond,et al.  Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1988 .

[10]  A. Contreras,et al.  Market penetration analysis of the use of hydrogen in the road transport sector of the Madrid region, using MARKAL , 2009 .

[11]  John P. Holdren,et al.  Meeting the Energy Challenge , 2001, Science.

[12]  Jyotirmay Mathur,et al.  Impacts of CO2 emission constraints on technology selection and energy resources for power generation in Bangladesh , 2011 .

[13]  David W. Cash,et al.  “In Order to Aid in Diffusing Useful and Practical Information”: Agricultural Extension and Boundary Organizations , 2001 .

[14]  Hal Turton,et al.  Conditions for the successful deployment of electric vehicles – A global energy system perspective , 2012 .

[15]  Chris Heaton.  Modelling Low-Carbon Energy System Designs with the ETI ESME Model , 2014 .

[16]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[17]  Simon Shackley,et al.  Global Climate Change: the Mutual Construction of an Emergent Science-Policy Domain , 1995 .

[18]  Ricardo Valerdi,et al.  Boundary Objects as a Framework to Understand the Role of Systems Integrators , 2007 .

[19]  A. Stirling.  Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices , 2014 .

[20]  Les Levidow,et al.  State imaginaries of the public good: shaping UK innovation priorities for bioenergy. , 2013 .

[21]  R. Stanton,et al.  Book reviewAn assessment of renewable energy for the UK: Edited by James Cavanagh, Vivien Brooks and Eric Bevan. HMSO, London 1994. pp. 308. Cost £30. ISBN 0 11 515348 9 , 1994 .

[22]  Gabrial Anandarajah,et al.  What are the costs of Scotland's climate and renewable policies? , 2012 .

[23]  Erika Mattila,et al.  Interdisciplinarity In the Making: Modeling Infectious Diseases , 2005, Perspectives on Science.

[24]  Gabrial Anandarajah,et al.  Towards a low-carbon economy: scenarios and policies for the UK , 2011 .

[25]  Kaj U. Koskinen,et al.  Role of boundary objects in negotiations of project contracts , 2009 .

[26]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[27]  Marco A. Janssen,et al.  The roles of computer models in the environmental policy life cycle , 2002 .

[28]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[29]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Soft-linking energy systems and GIS models to investigate spatial hydrogen infrastructure development in a low-carbon UK energy system , 2009 .

[31]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Feasibility of storing CO2 in the Utsira formation as part of a long term Dutch CCS strategy: An evaluation based on a GIS/MARKAL toolbox , 2010 .

[33]  Kemal Sarica,et al.  Analysis of US renewable fuels policies using a modified MARKAL model , 2011 .

[34]  R. Kannan,et al.  Hybrid modelling of long-term carbon reduction scenarios for the UK , 2008 .

[35]  Leslie G. Fishbone,et al.  Markal, a linear‐programming model for energy systems analysis: Technical description of the bnl version , 1981 .

[36]  I. Goklany.  Evidence to the House of Lords Select Committee on Economic Affairs on Aspects of the Economics of Climate Change , 2005 .

[37]  Ad Seebregts,et al.  Energy/Environmental Modeling with the MARKAL Family of Models , 2002 .

[38]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[39]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[40]  A. Stirling.  “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .

[41]  S. Egmond,et al.  Modeling for Policy Science-based models as performative boundary objects for Dutch policy making , 2010 .

[42]  Sir Isaiah Berlin.  The Divorce Between the Science and the Humanities , 1974 .

[43]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  Boundary Organizations: Enabling Collaboration among Unexpected Allies , 2008 .

[44]  Neil Strachan,et al.  UK energy policy ambition and UK energy modelling—fit for purpose? , 2011 .

[45]  Muammar Qaddafi,et al.  The Green Book , 1975 .

[46]  B. Sovacool.  What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .

[47]  Gabrial Anandarajah,et al.  Pathways to a Low Carbon Economy: Energy Systems Modelling , 2008 .

[48]  Pw Usher,et al.  UK MARKAL Modelling - Examining Decarbonisation Pathways in the 2020s on the Way to Meeting the 2050 Emissions Target , 2010 .

[49]  Tom Sir Blundell,et al.  Energy: the changing climate , 2001 .