Obstacle avoidance with sensor uncertainty for small unmanned aircraft

The ability to detect, sense, and avoid obstacles in the environment is a critical capability for autonomous groups of unmanned aircraft. The overall obstacle avoidance problem is typically studied as two or three separate subproblems. Unfortunately, such an approach can lead to unrealistic assumptions being made about the other subsystems or specification of unnecessarily high levels of subsystem performance. In this paper, we present an approach to obstacle avoidance in the context of a multilayered, multi-objective control architecture that considers both the aircraft dynamics and sensor limitations in an integrated framework. Specifically, the concept of reachable sets is extended to include the error model of parallel-baseline, stereovision. An analytical solution is presented for the planar motion of a single unmanned aircraft. In addition, the extension to groups of UAV is introduced.

[1]  Marco Zennaro,et al.  Strategies of Path-Planning for a UAV to Track a Ground Vehicle , 2003 .

[2]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Vision-based navigation by a mobile robot with obstacle avoidance using single-camera vision and ultrasonic sensing , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[3]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Flocking with Obstacle Avoidance : Cooperation with Limited Information in Mobile Networks , 2003 .

[4]  Ahmad A. Masoud,et al.  Motion planning in the presence of directional and regional avoidance constraints using nonlinear, anisotropic, harmonic potential fields: a physical metaphor , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[5]  Yasushi Yagi,et al.  Reactive Visual Navigation Based on Omnidirectional Sensing – Path Following and Collision Avoidance , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[6]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Computational techniques for the verification of hybrid systems , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[7]  Peter G. Ifju,et al.  Vision-guided flight stability and control for micro air vehicles , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[8]  Yoshiaki Shirai,et al.  Planning of vision-based navigation for a mobile robot under uncertainty , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot and Systems. Innovative Robotics for Real-World Applications. IROS '97.

[9]  R. Sengupta,et al.  A safe flight algorithm for unmanned aerial vehicles , 2004, 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720).

[10]  Stephen C. Spry,et al.  A VEHICLE FOLLOWING METHODOLOGY FOR UAV FORMATIONS , 2004 .

[11]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Exact robot navigation using artificial potential functions , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[12]  Xiao Xiao,et al.  Vision-based road-following using a small autonomous aircraft , 2004, 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720).

[13]  Manuela M. Veloso,et al.  Visual sonar: fast obstacle avoidance using monocular vision , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[14]  G. L. Barrows.  Future visual microsensors for mini/micro-UAV applications , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 7th IEEE International Workshop on Cellular Neural Networks and Their Applications.

[15]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Flocking with obstacle avoidance: cooperation with limited communication in mobile networks , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[16]  R. Olfati-Saber,et al.  Collision avoidance for multiple agent systems , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).