Perception of and adaptation to rectal isobaric distension in patients with faecal incontinence

BACKGROUND Perception of, and adaptation of the rectum to, distension probably play an important role in the maintenance of continence, but perception studies in faecal incontinence provide controversial conclusions possibly related to methodological biases. In order to better understand perception disorders, the aim of this study was to analyse anorectal adaptation to rectal isobaric distension in subjects with incontinence. PATIENTS/METHODS Between June 95 and December 97, 97 consecutive patients (nine men and 88 women, mean (SEM) age 55 (1) years) suffering from incontinence were evaluated and compared with 15 healthy volunteers (four men and 11 women, mean age 48 (3) years). The patients were classified into three groups according to their perception status to rectal isobaric distensions (impaired, 22; normal, 61; enhanced, 14). Anal and rectal adaptations to increasing rectal pressure were analysed using a model of rectal isobaric distension. RESULTS The four groups did not differ with respect to age, parity, or sex ratio. Magnitude of incontinence, prevalence of pelvic disorders, and sphincter defects were similar in the incontinent groups. When compared with healthy controls, anal pressure and rectal adaptation to distension were decreased in incontinent patients. When compared with incontinent patients with normal perception, patients with enhanced perception experienced similar rectal adaptation but had reduced anal pressure. In contrast, patients with impaired perception showed considerably decreased rectal adaptation but had similar anal pressure. CONCLUSION Abnormal sensations during rectal distension are observed in one third of subjects suffering from incontinence. These abnormalities may reflect hyperreactivity or neuropathological damage of the rectal wall.

[1]  L. Siproudhis,et al.  Rectal adaptation to distension in patients with overt rectal prolapse , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  L. Siproudhis,et al.  Octreotide acts on anorectal physiology: A dynamic study in healthy subjects , 1998, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[3]  Bellissant,et al.  Effects of cholinergic agents on anorectal physiology , 1998, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[4]  S. Nurko,et al.  Influence of sacral roots on anorectal function: A study of patients with isolated sacral agenesis , 1998 .

[5]  M. Camilleri,et al.  Pharmacological modulation of rectal tone alters perception of distention in humans. , 1997, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[6]  E A Mayer,et al.  Evidence for two distinct perceptual alterations in irritable bowel syndrome , 1997, Gut.

[7]  H. Meshkinpour,et al.  Clinical value of anorectal manometry index in neurogenic fecal incontinence , 1997, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[8]  S. S. Rao,et al.  How useful are manometric tests of anorectal function in the management of defecation disorders? , 1997, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[9]  E A Mayer,et al.  Repetitive sigmoid stimulation induces rectal hyperalgesia in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. , 1997, Gastroenterology.

[10]  E A Mayer,et al.  Regional cerebral activity in normal and pathological perception of visceral pain. , 1997, Gastroenterology.

[11]  G. Burnstock,et al.  Abnormal internal anal sphincter fibrosis and elasticity in fecal incontinence , 1995, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[12]  J. Malagelada,et al.  Gastric tone determines the sensitivity of the stomach to distention. , 1995, Gastroenterology.

[13]  D. Heresbach,et al.  Dyschezia and rectocele—A marriage of convenience? , 1993, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[14]  D. Heresbach,et al.  How accurate is clinical examination in diagnosing and quantifying pelvirectal disorders? A prospective study in a group of 50 patients complaining of defecatory difficulties , 1993, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[15]  M. Kamm,et al.  Abnormal visceral autonomic innervation in neurogenic faecal incontinence. , 1993, Gut.

[16]  T. Hachet,et al.  A multifunction and programmable computerized barostat. , 1993, Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique.

[17]  R. Smallwood,et al.  Anorectal function in patients with complete supraconal spinal cord lesions. , 1992, Gut.

[18]  O. Rasmussen,et al.  Anorectal pressure gradient in patients with anal incontinence , 1992, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[19]  N. Read,et al.  Utility of a combined test of anorectal manometry, electromyography, and sensation in determining the mechanism of 'idiopathic' faecal incontinence. , 1992, Gut.

[20]  Marti Mc [Fecal incontinence. Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment]. , 1992 .

[21]  M. Marti Incontinence fécale. Epidémiologie, diagnostic et traitement. , 1992 .

[22]  J. Malagelada,et al.  Reflex changes in intestinal tone: relationship to perception. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[23]  L. Hultén,et al.  The effects of age, gender, and parity on rectoanal functions in adults. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[24]  N. Read,et al.  Relation between rectal sensation and anal function in normal subjects and patients with faecal incontinence. , 1990, Gut.

[25]  P. Enck,et al.  Sensory and motor function in the maintenance of anal continence , 1990, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[26]  E. Kiff,et al.  The appreciation of rectal distention in fecal incontinence , 1989, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[27]  L. Hultén,et al.  Rectal reservoir and sensory function studied by graded isobaric distension in normal man. , 1989, Gut.

[28]  M. Swash,et al.  Ultrastructural changes in internal anal sphincter in neurogenic faecal incontinence. , 1988, Gut.