Supply Chain Relational Capital and the Bullwhip Effect: An Empirical Analysis Using Financial Disclosures

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to conduct a large-sample empirical investigation of how relational capital impacts bullwhip at the supplier. Design/methodology/approach The study uses mandatory disclosures in regulatory filings of US firms to identify a supplier’s major customers and constructs empirical proxies of supply chain relational capital, i.e., length of the relationship between suppliers and customers and partner interdependence. Multivariate regression analyses are performed to examine the effects of relational capital on bullwhip at the supplier. Findings The findings show that bullwhip at the supplier is greater when customers are more dependent on their suppliers, but is reduced when suppliers share longer relationships with their customers. The results also provide additional insights on several firm characteristics that impact supplier bullwhip, including shocks in order backlog, selling intensity and variations in profit margins. Furthermore, the authors document that the effect of supply chain relationships on bullwhip tends to vary across industries and over time. Originality/value The study employs a novel data set that is constructed using firms’ financial disclosures. This large panel data set consisting of 13,993 observations over 36 years enables thorough and robust analyses to characterize supply chain relationships and gain a deeper understanding of their impact on bullwhip.

[1]  Binshan Lin,et al.  Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  Thomas Warner Mitchell,et al.  Competitive Illusion as a Cause of Business Cycles , 1924 .

[3]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Forecast Sharing in the Semiconductor Equipment Supply Chain , 2005 .

[4]  Graham K. Rand.  Beyond Partnership: Strategies for Innovation and Lean Supply , 1993 .

[5]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  A simulation framework for forecasting uncertain lumpy demand , 1999 .

[6]  S. Hsu,et al.  The Impact of the Bullwhip Effect on Sales and Earnings Prediction Using Order Backlog , 2018 .

[7]  Shitao Yang,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Bullwhip Effect in China , 2014 .

[8]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective⋆ , 2011 .

[9]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[10]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Gaining from vertical partnerships : Knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries , 2003 .

[11]  R. Kapuściński,et al.  Value of Information in Capacitated Supply Chains , 1999 .

[12]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  The Impact of Duplicate Orders on Demand Estimation and Capacity Investment , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Saeed Samiee,et al.  The Influence of Global Marketing Standardization on Performance , 1992 .

[14]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Oscar Schisgall.  Eyes on tomorrow: The evolution of Procter & Gamble , 1981 .

[16]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Just-In-Time Exchange Relationships in Industrial Markets , 1988 .

[17]  Xiande Zhao,et al.  Forecasting errors and the value of information sharing in a supply chain , 2002 .

[18]  Anthony D. Ross,et al.  Supplier dependence: impact on supplier's participation and performance , 2008 .

[19]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[20]  Ton G. de Kok,et al.  Philips Electronics Synchronizes Its Supply Chain to End the Bullwhip Effect , 2005, Interfaces.

[21]  Xun Wang,et al.  The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Jeffrey H. Dyer.  Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage : Evidence from the auto industry , 1996 .

[23]  H. Şahin,et al.  Examination of effect of information sharing on businesses performance in the supply chain process , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[24]  浅沼 萬里,et al.  Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill , 1988 .

[25]  Giovanni Miragliotta,et al.  Layers and mechanisms: A new taxonomy for the Bullwhip Effect , 2006 .

[26]  Bu Xiang-zhi,et al.  An empirical study on "bullwhip effect" in the supply chain — Based on the statistical data from manufacturing industry of China , 2011, ICSSSM11.

[27]  Manoj K. Malhotra,et al.  The impact of bullwhip on supply chains: Performance pathways, control mechanisms, and managerial levers , 2015 .

[28]  Jian Jhen Chen,et al.  Coordination of information sharing in a supply chain , 2013 .

[29]  Lisa M. Ellram,et al.  Professional, Research, and Publishing Trends in Operations and Supply Chain Management , 2015 .

[30]  Scott A. Dellana,et al.  An exploration of quality management practices, perceptions and program maturity in the supply chain , 2014 .

[31]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  Are relational ties always good for knowledge acquisition? Buyer–supplier exchanges in China , 2014 .

[32]  G. Hoetker.  How Much You Know versus How Well I Know You: Selecting a Supplier for a Technically Innovative Component , 2005 .

[33]  Panos N. Patatoukas,et al.  Customer-Base Concentration: Implications for Firm Performance and Capital Markets , 2011 .

[34]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[35]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Building deep supplier relationships , 2004 .

[36]  Mustapha Sali,et al.  The bullwhip effect in supply chains: a study of contingent and incomplete literature , 2013 .

[37]  Shankar Ganesan.  Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships , 1994 .

[38]  Mohammed M. El-Beheiry,et al.  Empirical Quantification of Bullwhip Effect (With Application to a Toy Supply Chain) , 2004 .

[39]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  Developing Co-operative Buyer–Supplier Relationships: A Case Study of Toyota , 1998 .

[40]  Rossella Pozzi,et al.  Quantifying the benefits of the lean thinking adoption by the beer game supply chain , 2018 .

[41]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Salesforce Compensation: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Related to Use of Salary versus Incentive Compensation , 1989 .

[42]  Tzachi Zach,et al.  Information Externalities Along the Supply Chain: The Economic Determinants of Suppliers’ Stock Price Reaction to Their Customers’ Earnings Announcements , 2010 .

[43]  Richard K. Lai.  Bullwhip in a Spanish Shop , 2005 .

[44]  Shivaram Rajgopal,et al.  Does the Stock Market Fully Appreciate the Implications of Leading Indicators for Future Earnings? Evidence from Order Backlog , 2001 .

[45]  M. Sodhi.  Managing Demand Risk in Tactical Supply Chain Planning for a Global Consumer Electronics Company , 2005 .

[46]  In Lee,et al.  Evaluating antecedents and consequences of supply chain activities: an integrative perspective , 2010 .

[47]  H. Simon,et al.  On the Application of Servomechanism Theory in the Study of Production Control , 1952 .

[48]  Peter McCullen,et al.  Achieving lean supply through agile manufacturing , 2001 .

[49]  Stephen Michael Disney,et al.  Removing bullwhip from Lexmark's toner operations , 2013 .

[50]  J. Fransoo,et al.  Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain , 2000 .

[51]  R. Handfield,et al.  Creating supply chain relational capital: The impact of formal and informal socialization processes , 2006 .

[52]  John D. Sterman,et al.  “I’m not hoarding, I’m just stocking up before the hoarders get here.”: Behavioral causes of phantom ordering in supply chains , 2015 .

[53]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships , 1998 .

[54]  J. Forrester.  Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers , 2012 .

[55]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The Role of Information Technology in Organization Design , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[56]  Rafaella D. Broft,et al.  Towards Supply Chain Maturity in Construction , 2016 .

[57]  Russell Haines,et al.  A metacognitive perspective on decision making in supply chains: Revisiting the behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect , 2017 .

[58]  I. Winfield.  Japanese manufacturing techniques , 1994 .

[59]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  Creating Lean Suppliers: Diffusing Lean Production through the Supply Chain , 1997 .

[60]  Zhongdong Xiao,et al.  A study of the bullwhip effect in supply- and demand-driven supply chain , 2017 .

[61]  A. Toni.  Buyer-supplier operational practices, sourcing policies and plant performances: Results of an empirical research , 1999 .

[62]  Shailesh S. Kulkarni,et al.  Agility in manufacturing systems: an exploratory modeling framework and simulation , 2001 .

[63]  Ing-Long Wu,et al.  Information sharing and collaborative behaviors in enabling supply chain performance: A social exchange perspective , 2014 .

[64]  S. Disney,et al.  On bullwhip in supply chains--historical review, present practice and expected future impact , 2006 .

[65]  Taylor Randall,et al.  In Search of the Bullwhip Effect , 2007, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[66]  Paul Oyer,et al.  Fiscal Year Ends and Nonlinear Incentive Contracts: The Effect on Business Seasonality , 1998 .

[67]  Micah S. Officer,et al.  Inter-Firm Linkages and the Wealth Effects of Financial Distress Along the Supply Chain , 2008 .

[68]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on the Organization of Economic Activity: The "Move to the Middle" Hypothesis , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[69]  James A. Kahn.  Inventories and the volatility of production , 1986 .

[70]  Kevin McCormack,et al.  The development of a supply chain management process maturity model using the concepts of business process orientation , 2004 .

[71]  S. Disney,et al.  Reducing the bullwhip effect: Looking through the appropriate lens , 2007 .

[72]  Cathal Heavey,et al.  A framework for Collaborative Planning, Forecasting and Replenishment (CPFR): State of the Art , 2015, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[73]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[74]  T. Hout,et al.  Competing Against Time , 1990 .

[75]  Shankar Ganesan.  Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships , 1994 .

[76]  P. Cousins,et al.  THE IMPLICATIONS OF SOCIALIZATION AND INTEGRATION IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2006 .

[77]  Ralf W. Seifert,et al.  Quantifying the bullwhip effect using two-echelon data: A cross-industry empirical investigation , 2016 .

[78]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Information Transmission and the Bullwhip Effect: An Empirical Investigation , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[79]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  Research Note - Do Electronic Linkages Reduce the Bullwhip Effect? An Empirical Analysis of the U.S. Manufacturing Supply Chains , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[80]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement , 2007 .

[81]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration , 2012 .

[82]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  The bullwhip effect in supply chains , 2015, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[83]  Tzachi Zach,et al.  Information Externalities along the Supply Chain: The Economic Determinants of Suppliers’ Stock Price Reaction to Their Customers’ Earnings Announcements*: Information Externalities along the Supply Chain , 2011 .

[84]  Stephen J. Arnold,et al.  The impact of buyer dependence on buyer opportunism in buyer–supplier relationships: The moderating role of relational norms , 1997 .

[85]  M. Bergen,et al.  Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories , 1992 .

[86]  Frank Y. Chen,et al.  Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information.: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information. , 2000 .

[87]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  The Limits of Mass Customization , 2001 .

[88]  Arianna Alfieri,et al.  An empirical investigation on the antecedents of the bullwhip effect: Evidence from the spare parts industry , 2017, International Journal of Production Economics.

[89]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[90]  J. Liker,et al.  Japanese automakers, U.S. suppliers and supply-chain superiority , 2001 .

[91]  David Taylor.  Measurement and Analysis of Demand Amplification Across the Supply Chain , 1999 .

[92]  Peter McCullen,et al.  Practical ways of reducing bullwhip: the case of the Glosuch supply chain , 2001 .

[93]  C. Billington.  CYCLES ARE CYCLES , 2010 .

[94]  S. Helper.  How much has realliy changed between U.S. automakers and their suppliers , 1991 .

[95]  Richard D. Metters,et al.  Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains , 1997 .

[96]  Kuldip Singh Sangwan,et al.  Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues , 2014 .

[97]  Stephen Michael Disney,et al.  The effect of vendor managed inventory (VMI) dynamics on the Bullwhip Effect in supply chains , 2003 .

[98]  Banri Asanuma.  Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill , 1989 .

[99]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  An empirical investigation of supplier development: reactive and strategic processes , 1998 .

[100]  Tingting Yan,et al.  Supplier Opportunism in Buyer-Supplier New Product Development: A China-US Study of Antecedents, Consequences and Cultural/Institutional Contexts , 2014, Decis. Sci..

[101]  K. Dooley,et al.  INVENTORY MANAGEMENT AND THE BULLWHIP EFFECT DURING THE 2007–2009 RECESSION: EVIDENCE FROM THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR* , 2010 .

[102]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Opportunism in Interfirm Relationships: Forms, Outcomes, and Solutions , 2000 .

[103]  S. Helper,et al.  Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States , 1998 .

[104]  Bradley R. Staats,et al.  Perspectives on the productivity dilemma , 2009 .

[105]  Byunghak Leem,et al.  The effect of the supply chain social capital , 2013, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[106]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  A PROCESS ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL TRADE MANAGEMENT: AN INDUCTIVE APPROACH* , 2010 .

[107]  C. Sheu,et al.  Social capital, information sharing and performance: Evidence from China , 2014 .