User Centric Retrieval of Learning Objects in LMS

Research and Academic Institutions own and archive a great number of documents like lesson plan, study material and research related resources, which are needed to be stored and used over for a longer period of time by lecturers and researchers. In order to achieve this it is required to convert these educational resources into Learning Objects and store them in structured & meaningful way via a learning management system (LMS) thus enriching classical teaching. Also with enhancement of e-learning environment there is a great need of managing the LMS repositories by storing information resources as Learning object, a digital entity which can be used in electronic learning environment. These learning objects are stored in repositories and are managed by Learning Management Systems. It aids teaching and learning process and helps in communications between users. Many designs of LMS are non user-centric and has limited capabilities in delivering user preferred learning material. Searching through keywords or metadata of learning material will result in display of huge quantity of information. Thus there is an earnest need to identify the techniques that can provide more efficient mechanism for information retrieval. Recommendation techniques have shown to be successful in many domains (e.g. movies, books, music, etc.). Thus there is a need to deploy a recommending system in the E-Learning domain to extend the functionality of standard-based learning management systems with providing the user based retrieval. In this paper a model is being proposed that can enhance the search and delivery of a relevant learning object based on his/her preferences and further ranking & clustering of learning objects are done through K-Mean and Self Organising Maps for a personalised learning environment.

[1]  Sarah Currier,et al.  Building Quality Assurance into Metadata Creation: An Analysis based on the Learning Objects and e-Prints Communities of Practice , 2003, Dublin Core Conference.

[2]  Petra Perner,et al.  Data Mining - Concepts and Techniques , 2002, Künstliche Intell..

[3]  Yen Bui An Assessment of Metadata Quality : A Case Study of the National Science Digital Library Metadata Repository , 2006 .

[4]  Russ Wilde,et al.  Developing a university course for online delivery based on learning objects: from ideals to compromises , 2005 .

[5]  Besiki Stvilia,et al.  Metadata Quality Problems in Federated Collections , 2006 .

[6]  Jian Pei,et al.  Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, 3rd edition , 2006 .

[7]  Hugo Minni,et al.  Identifier management and resolution: conforming the IEEE standard for learning object metadata , 2008 .

[8]  Sami Jokela,et al.  Metadata Based Matching of Documents and User Profiles , 1998 .

[9]  Rong Yan,et al.  Efficient Margin-Based Rank Learning Algorithms for Information Retrieval , 2006, CIVR.

[10]  Alfred Ultsch,et al.  Knowledge Extraction from Self-Organizing Neural Networks , 1993 .

[11]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Data mining in course management systems: Moodle case study and tutorial , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Latif Al-Hakim,et al.  Information Quality Management: Theory and Applications , 2006 .

[13]  Erik Duval,et al.  Relevance Ranking Metrics for Learning Objects , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[14]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Reusing Online Resources: A Sustainable Approach to E-Learning , 2003 .

[15]  Sanjaya Mishra,et al.  Reusing Online Resources: A sustainable approach to e-learning , 2004 .

[16]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Personalizing Search via Automated Analysis of Interests and Activities , 2005, SIGIR.

[17]  Deepti Mehrotra,et al.  Quality metrics a quanta for retrieving learning object by clustering techniques , 2012, 2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and it's Applications (DICTAP).

[18]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  A Comparative Study of Page Ranking Algorithms for Information Retrieval , 2009 .

[19]  David A. Wiley,et al.  The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version , 2000 .

[20]  John C. Nesbit,et al.  A Convergent Participation Model for Evaluation of Learning Objects , 2002 .

[21]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The concept of relevance in IR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Issues in reusing online resources , 2003 .

[23]  David Wiley,et al.  Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy , 2000 .

[24]  Erik Duval,et al.  User Behavior in Learning Object Repositories: An Empirical Analysis , 2004 .

[25]  Pollyana Notargiacomo Mustaro,et al.  Clustering of learning objects with Self-Organizing Maps , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[26]  Qun Jin,et al.  Ranking Metrics and Search Guidance for Learning Object Repository , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[27]  Timo Honkela,et al.  WEBSOM - Self-organizing maps of document collections , 1998, Neurocomputing.

[28]  Chung-Chian Hsu,et al.  Generalizing self-organizing map for categorical data , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.