A Phenotyping Platform to Characterize Healthy Individuals Across Four Stages of Life - The Enable Study

Introduction: Nutritional habits and requirements are changing over the lifespan, but the dynamics of nutritional issues and the diet-health relationship in the major stages of the human life cycle are not sufficiently understood. A human phenotyping research platform for nutrition studies was established to recruit and phenotype selected population groups across different stages of life. The project is the backbone of the highly interdisciplinary enable competence cluster of nutrition research aiming to identify dietary determinants of a healthy life throughout the lifespan and to develop healthier and tasty convenience foods with high consumer acceptance. Methods: The phenotyping program included anthropometry, body composition analysis, assessment of energy metabolism, health and functional status, multisensory perception, metabolic phenotyping, lifestyle, sociodemography, chronobiology, and assessment of dietary intake including food preferences and aversions. Results: In total, 503 healthy volunteers at four defined phases of life including 3–5-year old children (n = 44), young adults aged 18–25 years (n = 94), adults aged 40–65 years (“middle agers,” n = 205), and older adults aged 75–85 years (n = 160) were recruited and comprehensively phenotyped. Plasma, serum, buffy coat, urine, feces and saliva samples were collected and stored at −80°C. Significant differences in anthropometric and metabolic parameters between the four groups were found. A major finding was the decrease in fat-free mass and the concomitant increase in % body fat in both sexes across the adult lifespan. Conclusions: The dataset will provide novel information on differences in diet-related parameters over the lifespan and is available for targeted analyses. We expect that this novel platform approach will have implications for the development of innovative food products tailored to promote healthy eating throughout life. Trial registration: DRKS, DRKS00009797. Registered on 20 January 2016, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&_ID=DRKS00009797.

[1]  J. Linseisen,et al.  Usual Dietary Intake Estimation Based on a Combination of Repeated 24-H Food Lists and a Food Frequency Questionnaire in the KORA FF4 Cross-Sectional Study , 2019, Front. Nutr..

[2]  P. Brambilla,et al.  Factors Influencing Children’s Eating Behaviours , 2018, Nutrients.

[3]  A. Ventura,et al.  Promoting healthy food preferences from the start: a narrative review of food preference learning from the prenatal period through early childhood , 2018, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[4]  Jai K Das,et al.  Nutrition in adolescents: physiology, metabolism, and nutritional needs , 2017, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  F. Marijn Stok,et al.  The DONE framework: Creation, evaluation, and updating of an interdisciplinary, dynamic framework 2.0 of determinants of nutrition and eating , 2017, PloS one.

[6]  A. Moran,et al.  The Global Burden of Disease Study and the Preventable Burden of NCD. , 2016, Global heart.

[7]  S. Nicklaus The role of food experiences during early childhood in food pleasure learning , 2016, Appetite.

[8]  Robert Koch-Institut Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1) , 2015 .

[9]  Neslihan Koyuncuoğlu Güngör,et al.  Overweight and Obesity in Children and Adolescents , 2014, Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology.

[10]  H Boeing,et al.  Development and evaluation of a short 24-h food list as part of a blended dietary assessment strategy in large-scale cohort studies , 2014, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[11]  Harald T. Schupp,et al.  Why we eat what we eat. The Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS) , 2012, Appetite.

[12]  Jessica Freiherr,et al.  The 40-item Monell Extended Sniffin’ Sticks Identification Test (MONEX-40) , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  M. Inzitari,et al.  Nutrition in the age-related disablement process , 2011, The journal of nutrition, health & aging.

[14]  R. Jeantet,et al.  Available online at: , 2009 .

[15]  E. Köster Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective , 2009 .

[16]  T. Nikolaus,et al.  [Reliability of the abbreviated version of the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument--a meaningful and feasible tool to assess physical function and disability in the elderly]. , 2009, Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie.

[17]  J. Robine,et al.  The reliability of the Minimum European Health Module , 2009, International Journal of Public Health.

[18]  T. Roenneberg,et al.  The search for circadian clock components in humans: new perspectives for association studies. , 2008, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[19]  U. Nöthlings,et al.  Fitting portion sizes in a self-administered food frequency questionnaire. , 2007, The Journal of nutrition.

[20]  J. Salmon,et al.  Associations Between the Home Food Environment and Obesity‐promoting Eating Behaviors in Adolescence , 2007, Obesity.

[21]  John T Chibnall,et al.  Appetite assessment: simple appetite questionnaire predicts weight loss in community-dwelling adults and nursing home residents. , 2005, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[22]  J. Robine,et al.  Creating a coherent set of indicators to monitor health across Europe: the Euro-REVES 2 project. , 2003, European journal of public health.

[23]  Suzanne G. Leveille,et al.  Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[24]  C. Jessie Jones,et al.  Development and Validation of a Functional Fitness Test for Community-Residing Older Adults , 1999 .

[25]  C. J. Jones,et al.  Functional Fitness Normative Scores for Community-Residing Older Adults, Ages 60-94 , 1999 .

[26]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[27]  W. V. Tilburg,et al.  Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam , 1990 .

[28]  Eugene B. Brody,et al.  A Psychological Perspective , 1986 .

[29]  B. Dohrenwend,et al.  Exemplification of a method for scaling life events: the Peri Life Events Scale. , 1978, Journal of health and social behavior.

[30]  S. Folstein,et al.  “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician , 1975 .

[31]  A. Beekman,et al.  COHORT PROFILE Cohort Profile : The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam , 2011 .

[32]  P. Auquier,et al.  Quality of life in children and adolescents: a European public health perspective , 2005, Sozial- und Präventivmedizin.

[33]  J. Mcwhinnie Disability assessment in population surveys: results of the O.E.C.D. Common Development Effort. , 1981, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[34]  J. Horne,et al.  A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. , 1976, International journal of chronobiology.