Petrophysical characterization of tight oil reservoirs using pressure-controlled porosimetry combined with rate-controlled porosimetry

Abstract Tight oil reservoirs typically show a wide pore size distribution with pore sizes ranging from several nanometers to several hundred microns, requiring a combination of several techniques to properly characterize the pore structures. In this paper, scanning electron microscopy, pressure-controlled porosimetry and rate-controlled porosimetry were applied to investigate the pore systems of a tight sandstone oil reservoir in Ordos Basin, Northern China. Pores were identified and classified by scanning electron microscopy; pore size distribution was calculated by pressure-controlled porosimetry and rate-controlled porosimetry; main pore sizes were clarified and an empirical permeability estimation model is proposed by extending Winland’s work. Results indicate that four types of pores exist in tight sandstone oil reservoirs, which are residual interparticle pores, grain dissolution pores, clay dominated pores and micro fractures. A combination of pressure-controlled porosimetry and rate-controlled porosimetry is proposed as a new method to obtain the overall pore size distribution of tight oil reservoirs with pore radii ranging from 9.2 nm to 500 μm. The overall pore size distribution of tight oil reservoirs is polymodal; pores with radii ranging between 80 and 500 μm and distributed around the right peak are composed of residual interparticle pores, while the left peaks show fluctuation because of complexity in pore types and the multi-scale porosity of clays. The average mercury intrusion saturation of the nanopores is 66.50% and that of mesopores is 24.16%. The nanopores and mesopores are considered to be the main pore types. The new permeability estimation equation indicates a throat radius corresponding to 30% mercury saturation is the dominant throat radius, and shows suitable estimation of permeability with an R 2 value of 0.95542. The proposed method is effective in obtaining the overall pore size distribution of the tight oil reservoirs, and can further be used for storage capacity evaluation and better permeability estimation.

[1]  H. H. Yuan.  Pore-Scale Heterogeneity From Mercury Porosimetry Data (includes associated papers 22051 and 22052 ) , 1991 .

[2]  Donald L. Katz,et al.  Threshold pressure phenomena in porous media , 1968 .

[3]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Pore structure characterization of North American shale gas reservoirs using USANS/SANS, gas adsorption, and mercury intrusion , 2013 .

[4]  Roman Loser,et al.  Analysis of cement-bonded materials by multi-cycle mercury intrusion and nitrogen sorption. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[5]  Ali Saeedi,et al.  Tight gas sands permeability estimation from mercury injection capillary pressure and nuclear magnetic resonance data , 2012 .

[6]  János Urai,et al.  High-resolution 3D fabric and porosity model in a tight gas sandstone reservoir:A new approach to investigate microstructures from mm- to nm-scale combining argon beam cross-sectioning and SEM imaging , 2011 .

[7]  A. Jafari,et al.  Relationships between permeability, porosity and pore throat size in carbonate rocks using regression analysis and neural networks , 2006 .

[8]  R. Loucks,et al.  Morphology, Genesis, and Distribution of Nanometer-Scale Pores in Siliceous Mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale , 2009 .

[9]  Xiuqin Deng,et al.  Characteristics of tight oil in Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin , 2013 .

[10]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Innovative methods for flow-unit and pore-structure analyses in a tight siltstone and shale gas reservoir , 2012 .

[11]  J. Schieber,et al.  Common Themes in the Formation and Preservation of Intrinsic Porosity in Shales and Mudstones - Illustrated with Examples Across the Phanerozoic , 2010 .

[12]  Caineng Zou,et al.  Unconventional Petroleum Geology , 2012 .

[13]  Xuan Tang,et al.  Shale characteristics in the southeastern Ordos Basin, China: Implications for hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and the potential of continental shales , 2014 .

[14]  Manika Prasad,et al.  Understanding Pore-Structure And Permeability In Shales , 2011 .

[15]  Yanbin Yao,et al.  Comparison of low-field NMR and mercury intrusion porosimetry in characterizing pore size distributions of coals , 2012 .

[16]  Xiangxiang Zhang,et al.  Tight gas sandstone reservoirs in China: characteristics and recognition criteria , 2012 .

[17]  Marios A. Ioannidis,et al.  Pore size distribution in multiscale porous media as revealed by DDIF–NMR, mercury porosimetry and statistical image analysis , 2007 .

[18]  B. F. Swanson,et al.  Resolving pore-space characteristics by rate-controlled porosimetry , 1989 .

[19]  P. Choquette,et al.  Geologic Nomenclature and Classification of Porosity in Sedimentary Carbonates , 1970 .

[20]  Celso Peres Fernandes,et al.  Characterization of pore systems in seal rocks using Nitrogen Gas Adsorption combined with Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure techniques , 2013 .

[21]  M. Blunt,et al.  Pore-scale imaging and modelling , 2013 .

[22]  János Urai,et al.  BIB-SEM study of the pore space morphology in early mature Posidonia Shale from the Hils area, Germany , 2012 .

[23]  Hua Yang,et al.  Deposition of Yanchang Formation deep-water sandstone under the control of tectonic events in the Ordos Basin , 2013 .

[24]  E. Pittman.  Relationship of porosity and permeability to various parameters derived from mercury injection-capillary pressure curves for sandstone , 1992 .

[25]  Yanbin Yao,et al.  Non-destructive characterization of coal samples from China using microfocus X-ray computed tomography , 2009 .

[26]  I. Furó,et al.  Comparison of NMR Cryoporometry, Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry, and DSC Thermoporosimetry in Characterizing Pore Size Distributions of Compressed Finely Ground Calcium Carbonate Structures , 2004 .

[27]  L. Humbert,et al.  Dynamics of capillary flow and transport properties in porous media by time-controlled porosimetry , 2002 .

[28]  E. Favvas,et al.  Characterization of carbonate rocks by combination of scattering, porosimetry and permeability techniques , 2009 .

[29]  C. Sondergeld,et al.  An Improved Empirical Permeability Estimator From Mercury Injection For Tight Clastic Rocks , 2007 .

[30]  L. Scriven,et al.  Pore-Space Statistics and Capillary Pressure Curves From Volume-Controlled Porosimetry , 1994 .

[31]  E. W. Washburn.  The Dynamics of Capillary Flow , 1921 .

[32]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Reservoir Engineering for Unconventional Reservoirs: What Do We Have to Consider? , 2011 .

[33]  Stephen C. Ruppel,et al.  Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores , 2012 .

[34]  Stanley Kolodzie,et al.  Analysis Of Pore Throat Size And Use Of The Waxman-Smits Equation To Determine Ooip In Spindle Field, Colorado , 1980 .

[35]  G. Zheng,et al.  Geochemical study of crude oils from the Xifeng oilfield of the Ordos basin, China , 2008 .

[36]  D. Avnir,et al.  Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids (Technical Report) , 1994 .

[37]  W. R. Purcell,et al.  Capillary Pressures - Their Measurement Using Mercury and the Calculation of Permeability Therefrom , 1949 .

[38]  Fei Liu,et al.  Distribution and geological significance of 17α(H)-diahopanes from different hydrocarbon source rocks of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin , 2009 .

[39]  Taha M. Okasha,et al.  Comparison of permeability models using mercury injection capillary pressure data on carbonate rock samples , 2014 .

[40]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses: Examples from the Barnett, Woodford, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Doig units , 2012 .

[41]  B. F. Swanson.  A Simple Correlation Between Permeabilities and Mercury Capillary Pressures , 1981 .