Positive Darwinian selection promotes charge profile diversity in the antigen-binding cleft of class I major-histocompatibility-complex molecules.

Certain major-histocompatibility-complex (MHC) loci are highly polymorphic, and the mechanism of maintenance of this polymorphism remains controversial. Recent studies of the pattern of nucleotide substitution at MHC loci have produced strong evidence that this polymorphism is maintained mainly by positive Darwinian selection that operates on the antigen recognition site (ARS) of the MHC molecule. The ARS of the class I MHC consists of three subregions: (1) the binding cleft, (2) T-cell-receptor-directed residues, and (3) outward-directed residues. Here we report that the rate of nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution is much higher in the binding cleft than in the other ARS subregions. Furthermore, nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions that result in a change of residue side-chain charge occur significantly more frequently than expected by chance. We conclude that the main target of positive selection on the class I MHC molecules is the binding cleft of the ARS and that this selection acts primarily to promote diversity among alleles with respect to the pattern of residue side-chain charges (charge profile) in the binding cleft. These results provide additional support for the hypothesis that MHC polymorphism is maintained by overdominant selection relating to antigen-binding capacity and thus to disease resistance.

[1]  M. Nei,et al.  Allelic genealogy under overdominant and frequency-dependent selection and polymorphism of major histocompatibility complex loci. , 1990, Genetics.

[2]  P Parham,et al.  Evolution of class-I MHC genes and proteins: from natural selection to thymic selection. , 1990, Annual review of immunology.

[3]  M. A. Saper,et al.  Specificity pockets for the side chains of peptide antigens in HLA-Aw68 , 1990, Nature.

[4]  M. Nei,et al.  Evolution of the major histocompatibility complex: independent origin of nonclassical class I genes in different groups of mammals. , 1989, Molecular biology and evolution.

[5]  P. Parham,et al.  Diversity and diversification of HLA-A,B,C alleles. , 1989, Journal of immunology.

[6]  M. Palmer,et al.  Complete nucleotide sequence of a unique HLA class I C locus product expressed on the human choriocarcinoma cell line BeWo. , 1989, Journal of immunology.

[7]  H. Grey,et al.  Prediction of major histocompatibility complex binding regions of protein antigens by sequence pattern analysis. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  L. Jin,et al.  Variances of the average numbers of nucleotide substitutions within and between populations. , 1989, Molecular biology and evolution.

[9]  M. Kuhner,et al.  DNA sequences of mouse H-2 and Qa genes. , 1989, Immunogenetics.

[10]  P. Parham,et al.  Nature of polymorphism in HLA-A, -B, and -C molecules. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  L. Flaherty.  Major histocompatibility complex polymorphism: a nonimmune theory for selection. , 1988, Human immunology.

[12]  M. A. Saper,et al.  The foreign antigen binding site and T cell recognition regions of class I histocompatibility antigens , 1987, Nature.

[13]  Prim B. Singh,et al.  MHC antigens in urine as olfactory recognition cues , 1987, Nature.

[14]  Robert P. Erickson,et al.  Natural history of the major histocompatibility complex , 1987 .

[15]  M. Nei.  Molecular Evolutionary Genetics , 1987 .

[16]  W. Taylor,et al.  The classification of amino acid conservation. , 1986, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  M. Nei,et al.  Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. , 1986, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  J. Geliebter,et al.  Murine major histocompatibility complex class-I mutants: molecular analysis and structure-function implications. , 1986, Annual review of immunology.

[19]  T. Wegmann.  Foetal protection against abortion: is it immunosuppression or immunostimulation? , 1984, Annales d'immunologie.

[20]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Sensory distinction between H-2b and H-2bm1 mutant mice. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  T. Miyata,et al.  Unusual evolutionary conservation and frequent DNA segment exchange in class I genes of the major histocompatibility complex. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  E. Simpson,et al.  The structure of a mutant H–2 gene suggests that the generation of polymorphism in H–2 genes may occur by gene conversion-like events , 1983, Nature.

[23]  H. Orr,et al.  Structure of crossreactive human histocompatibility antigens HLA-A28 and HLA-A2: possible implications for the generation of HLA polymorphism. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  E. Boyse,et al.  Recognition among mice. Evidence from the use of a Y-maze differentially scented by congenic mice of different major histocompatibility types , 1979, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[25]  B J Mathieson,et al.  Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex , 1976, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[26]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Enhanced immunological surveillance in mice heterozygous at the H-2 gene complex , 1975, Nature.

[27]  A. Clarke.  The effects of maternal pre-immunization on pregnancy in the mouse. , 1971, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[28]  D. Bailey,et al.  Inherited histocompatibility changes in progeny of irradiated and unirradiated inbred mice. , 1965, Genetical research.

[29]  D. James.  Effects of Antigenic Dissimilarity between Mother and Foetus on Placental Size in Mice , 1965, Nature.