Alternative modes for optical trapping and manipulation using counter-propagating shaped beams

Counter-propagating beams have enabled the first stable three-dimensional optical trapping of microparticles and this procedure has been enhanced and developed over the years to achieve independent and interactive manipulation of multiple particles. In this work, we analyse counter-propagating shaped-beam traps that depart from the conventional geometry based on symmetric, coaxial counter-propagating beams. We show that projecting shaped beams with separation distances previously considered axially unstable can, in fact, enhance the axial and transverse trapping stiffnesses. We also show that deviating from using perfectly counter-propagating beams to use oblique beams can improve the axial stability of the traps and improve the axial trapping stiffness. These alternative geometries can be particularly useful for handling larger particles. These results hint at a rich potential for light shaping for optical trapping and manipulation using patterned counter-propagating beams, which still remains to be fully tapped.

[1]  M. Prentiss,et al.  Demonstration of a fiber-optical light-force trap. , 1993, Optics letters.

[2]  S. Hell,et al.  Spherical nanosized focal spot unravels the interior of cells , 2008, Nature Methods.

[3]  Jesper Glückstad.  Generalized phase contrast , 2000 .

[4]  Peter John Rodrigo,et al.  Real-time three-dimensional optical micromanipulation of multiple particles and living cells. , 2004, Optics letters.

[5]  R. Burgemeister,et al.  Noncontact laser catapulting: a basic procedure for functional genomics and proteomics. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[6]  A. Ashkin.  Forces of a single-beam gradient laser trap on a dielectric sphere in the ray optics regime. , 1992, Methods in cell biology.

[7]  Peter John Rodrigo,et al.  GPC-based optical micromanipulation in 3D real-time using a single spatial light modulator. , 2006, Optics express.

[8]  Yuxiang Liu,et al.  Investigation of inclined dual-fiber optical tweezers for 3D manipulation and force sensing. , 2009, Optics express.

[9]  Peter John Rodrigo,et al.  Four-dimensional optical manipulation of colloidal particles , 2005 .

[10]  Jesper Glückstad,et al.  Dynamic axial stabilization of counter-propagating beam-traps with feedback control. , 2010, Optics express.

[11]  Peter John Rodrigo,et al.  Three-dimensional forces in GPC-based counterpropagating-beam traps. , 2006, Optics express.

[12]  K. Dholakia,et al.  Microfluidic sorting in an optical lattice , 2003, Nature.

[13]  Jesper Glückstad,et al.  Sorting particles with light , 2004, Nature materials.

[14]  Jeppe Seidelin Dam,et al.  Fully automated beam-alignment and single stroke guided manual alignment of counter-propagating multi-beam based optical micromanipulation systems. , 2007, Optics express.

[15]  W. Osten,et al.  Holographic twin traps , 2009 .

[16]  A. Ashkin.  Acceleration and trapping of particles by radiation pressure , 1970 .

[17]  H. Niu,et al.  Deterministic approach to the generation of modified helical beams for optical manipulation. , 2005, Optics express.

[18]  S. Chu,et al.  Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles. , 1986, Optics letters.

[19]  Monika Ritsch-Marte,et al.  Optical mirror trap with a large field of view. , 2009, Optics express.

[20]  A. Chiou,et al.  Self-aligned dual-beam optical laser trap using photorefractive phase conjugation , 1997 .

[21]  Steve Granick,et al.  Image analysis with rapid and accurate two-dimensional Gaussian fitting. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[22]  Jeppe Seidelin Dam,et al.  Independent trapping, manipulation and characterization by an all-optical biophotonics workstation , 2008 .

[23]  Jesper Glückstad,et al.  Real-time interactive optical micromanipulation of a mixture of high-and low-index particles. , 2004, Optics express.

[24]  Christian Dietrich,et al.  The optical cell rotator. , 2008, Optics express.