Studying Functional Brain Networks to Understand Mathematical Thinking: A Graph-Theoretical Approach

Brain function during mathematical thinking is a common concern of scientists from different research fields. The study of functional brain networks extracted from electroencephalographic (EEG) signals using graph theory seems to meet the challenge of neuroscience to understand brain functioning in terms of dynamic flow of information among brain regions. Some studies have found differences between the basic arithmetic operations among brain regions; however, they have not explained the brain function during difficult mathematical tasks and complex mathematical processing. This study investigates the changes of the functional networks’ organization among different mathematical tasks. To this end, EEG data from 10 subjects were recorded during three different tasks, Number Looking which was served as the control situation, Simple Addition which refers to the addition of single-digit numbers and Difficult Multiplication with trials of two-digit multiplications. We analyzed weighted graphs so as to provide a more realistic representation of functional brain networks. Mutual information was employed to form the weights among the different channels, while various global and local graph indices were further examined. The results suggest that there are some statistically significant differences between graph theoretical indices among the different tasks and their range of values depend on the particular task.

[1]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[2]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Panagiotis D. Bamidis,et al.  REG-ICA: A hybrid methodology combining Blind Source Separation and regression techniques for the rejection of ocular artifacts , 2011, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Single-trial classification of parallel pre-attentive and serial attentive processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  Manuela Piazza,et al.  Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  M. Delazer,et al.  Neuroscience of learning arithmetic—Evidence from brain imaging studies , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[9]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[10]  Manuela Piazza,et al.  How Humans Count: Numerosity and the Parietal Cortex , 2009, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[11]  Christa Neuper,et al.  To retrieve or to calculate? Left angular gyrus mediates the retrieval of arithmetic facts during problem solving , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Are Subitizing and Counting Implemented as Separate or Functionally Overlapping Processes? , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  K. Kaski,et al.  Intensity and coherence of motifs in weighted complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Panagiotis D. Bamidis,et al.  How does the metric choice affect brain functional connectivity networks? , 2012, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[15]  D. Ansari Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[17]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[18]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Neural basis of mathematical cognition , 2011, Current Biology.

[19]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .