On the Use of a Water Balance to Evaluate Interannual Terrestrial ET Variability

AbstractAccurately measuring interannual variability in terrestrial evapotranspiration ET is a major challenge for efforts to detect trends in the terrestrial hydrologic cycle. Based on comparisons with annual values of terrestrial evapotranspiration derived from a terrestrial water balance analysis, past research has cast doubt on the ability of existing products to accurately capture variability. Using a variety of estimates, this analysis reexamines this conclusion and finds that estimates of variations obtained from a land surface model are more strongly correlated with independently acquired from thermal infrared remote sensing than derived from water balance considerations. This tendency is attributed to significant interannual variations in terrestrial water storage neglected by the water balance approach. Overall, results demonstrate the need to reassess perceptions concerning the skill of estimates derived from land surface models and show the value of accurate remotely sensed ET products for the...

[1]  Y. Xue,et al.  Modeling of land surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observations , 1996 .

[2]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and Sensitivity , 2001 .

[3]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model , 2003 .

[4]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  The multi‐institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system , 2004 .

[5]  David D. Parrish,et al.  NORTH AMERICAN REGIONAL REANALYSIS , 2006 .

[6]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  Estimating groundwater storage changes in the Mississippi River basin (USA) using GRACE , 2007 .

[7]  Matthew Rodell,et al.  Analysis of terrestrial water storage changes from GRACE and GLDAS , 2008 .

[8]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Towards global empirical upscaling of FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: validation of a model tree ensemble approach using a biosphere model , 2009 .

[9]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply , 2010, Nature.

[10]  Uang,et al.  The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis , 2010 .

[11]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Mapping daily evapotranspiration at field to continental scales using geostationary and polar orbiting satellite imagery , 2010 .

[12]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Evaluation of global observations‐based evapotranspiration datasets and IPCC AR4 simulations , 2011 .

[13]  P. Ciais,et al.  Global evapotranspiration over the past three decades: estimation based on the water balance equation combined with empirical models , 2012 .

[14]  F. Landerer,et al.  Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates , 2012 .

[15]  K. Mo,et al.  Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products , 2012 .

[16]  Enli Wang,et al.  Decadal Trends in Evaporation from Global Energy and Water Balances , 2012 .

[17]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Upscaling of evapotranspiration fluxes from instantaneous to daytime scales for thermal remote sensing applications , 2013 .

[18]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  A worldwide analysis of spatiotemporal changes in water balance‐based evapotranspiration from 1982 to 2009 , 2014 .

[19]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Diagnosing Neglected Soil Moisture Source–Sink Processes via a Thermal Infrared–Based Two-Source Energy Balance Model , 2015 .