Prospective and current secondary mathematics teachers’ criteria for evaluating mathematical cognitive technologies

ABSTRACT As technology becomes more ubiquitous in the mathematics classroom, teachers are being asked to incorporate it into their lessons more than ever before. The amount of resources available online is staggering and teachers need to be able to analyse and identify resources that would be most appropriate and effective with their students. This study examines the criteria prospective and current secondary mathematics teachers use and value most when evaluating mathematical cognitive technologies (MCTs). Results indicate all groups of participants developed criteria focused on how well an MCT represents the mathematics, student interaction and engagement with the MCT, and whether the MCT was user-friendly. However, none of their criteria focused on how well an MCT would reflect students’ solution strategies or illuminate their thinking. In addition, there were some differences between the criteria created by participants with and without teaching experience, specifically the types of supports available in an MCT. Implications for mathematics teacher educators are discussed.

[1]  Aaron Trocki,et al.  Evaluating and writing dynamic geometry tasks , 2014 .

[2]  B. Yushau,et al.  Computer Aided Learning of Mathematics: Software Evaluation , 2004 .

[3]  S. Hennessy,et al.  Pupil perspectives on the contribution of information and communication technology to teaching and learning in the secondary school , 2003 .

[4]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Examining Teachers’ Beliefs About the Role of Technology in the Elementary Classroom , 1999 .

[5]  Gene E. Hall,et al.  Change in Schools: Facilitating the Process. SUNY Series in Educational Leadership. , 1987 .

[6]  Ron Oliver,et al.  When Teaching Meets Learning : Design Principles and Strategies for Web-based Learning Environments that Support Knowledge Construction , 2000 .

[7]  Donn Ritchie,et al.  Using Instructional Design Principles to Amplify Learning on the World Wide Web , 1996 .

[8]  Christopher J. Johnston,et al.  Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Planning for Math Instruction: Use of Technology Tools , 2009 .

[9]  Mike Thomas,et al.  Using computers in the mathematics classroom: The role of the teacher , 1996 .

[10]  Richard Houde,et al.  From Recitation to Construction: Teachers Change with New Technologies. Technical Report. , 1988 .

[11]  Hilda Borko,et al.  Student teachers' understandings of successful and unsuccessful teaching , 1987 .

[12]  Leping Liu,et al.  Web-Based Resources and Applications , 2004 .

[13]  M. Sinclair.  Some implications of the results of a case study for the design of pre-constructed, dynamic geometry sketches and accompanying materials , 2003 .

[14]  Patricia S. Moyer-Packenham,et al.  Virtual Manipulatives Used by K-8 Teachers for Mathematics Instruction: Considering Mathematical, Cognitive, and Pedagogical Fidelity , 2008 .

[15]  Regina M. Mistretta.  Integrating Technology Into the Mathematics Classroom: The role of Teacher Preparation Programs , 2005 .

[16]  Laura Hoch,et al.  Implementing Change Patterns Principles And Potholes , 2016 .

[17]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[18]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[19]  Milan Sherman,et al.  Using Appropriate Tools Strategically for Instruction. , 2015 .

[20]  Jennifer M. Suh,et al.  Modeling 10-ness using Tech-knowledgy , 2012 .

[21]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) , 2009 .

[22]  Sheryl Burgstahler,et al.  Universal Design in Higher Education: From Principles to Practice. Second Edition. , 2008 .

[23]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Predicting quality in educational software: Evaluating For Learning, Usability and the Synergy between Them , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[24]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  Digital Tools for Algebra Education: Criteria and Evaluation , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[25]  R. Pea.  Beyond Amplification : Using the Computer to Reorganize Mental Functioning , 1985 .

[26]  Beth Bos,et al.  Virtual math objects with pedagogical, mathematical, and cognitive fidelity , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Charles E. Notar,et al.  Multimedia Software Evaluation Form for Teachers. , 2005 .

[28]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? , 2013 .