The removal of ocular artefacts from the electroencephalogram: a review

The causes of ocular artefacts (OAs) in the human electroencephalogram (EEG) are explained and methods for their removal and their effectiveness are discussed. Recommendations for the best procedures to adopt are given together with suggestions for future research. Analogue subtraction techniques are found to be inferior to time domain techniques based on parameter estimation using the method of least squares applied to a linear function of the electro-occulograms (EOGs). Ways of assessing the effectiveness of different models for time domain removal of OAs are discussed. It is concluded that autoregressive modelling of the error terms, or else differenced data, must be used to reduce the effects of correlation in the background EEG. The most generally suitable model for the removal of random eye and blink artefacts should contain terms proportional to the right vertical EOG and the two horizontal EOGs. The EOGs should be linearly filtered to remove noise frequency components in excess of 8 Hz. Adaptive methods are preferred as on line OA removal would be desirable but for the fact that this may result in distortion of stimulus-related responses present. A number of difficulties remain and there are some suggestions for future research.

[1]  J. S. Barlow,et al.  Eye movement artifact nulling in EEGs by multichannel on-line EOG subtraction. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  T. Gasser,et al.  The correction of EOG artifacts by frequency dependent and frequency independent methods. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[3]  K. M. Kleinman,et al.  A single channel method for recording vertical and lateral eye movements. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  W G Walter,et al.  The effects of attention and distraction on the contingent negative variation in normal and neurotic subjects. , 1968, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  A S Gevins,et al.  On-line computer rejection of EEG artifact. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  Mary E. Shaw,et al.  Removal of an Eye , 2008 .

[7]  G. Bierman Measurement updating using the U-D factorization , 1975 .

[8]  A. Winter,et al.  New techniques for the control of eye potential artefacts in multichannel CNV recordings. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  Gerald J. Bierman,et al.  Measurement updating using the U-D factorization , 1975, 1975 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 14th Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[10]  Emmanuel Ifeachor,et al.  Scientific demonstrationA microcomputer-based instrument for on-line ocular artefact removal , 1985 .

[11]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  E. C. Ifeachor,et al.  Digital filtering of physiological signals with minimal distortion , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[13]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Removal of ocular artifacts from the EEG--a biophysical approach to the EOG. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  M. J. Nichols,et al.  The assessment of two methods for removing eye movement artefact from the EEG. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  J R Ives,et al.  Clinical applications of spectral analysis and extraction of features from electroencephalograms with slow waves in adult patients. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  D. Overton,et al.  PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH APPLICATION OF THE CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION TO PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH , 1969, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[17]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[18]  J. C. Corby,et al.  Differential contributions of blinks and vertical eye movements as artifacts in EEG recording. , 1972, Psychophysiology.

[19]  L. Young,et al.  Survey of eye movement recording methods , 1975 .

[20]  Emmanuel Ifeachor,et al.  A new microcomputer-based online ocular artefact removal (OAR) system , 1986 .

[21]  J. Kamiya,et al.  A simple on-line technique for removing eye movement artifacts from the EEG. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  V Rowland,et al.  Interaction of electro-ocular potentials with the contingent negative variation. , 1970, Psychophysiology.

[23]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Eye movement artifact in the CNV. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  P. Berg,et al.  The residual after correcting event-related potentials for blink artifacts. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[25]  S. Butler,et al.  The localization of equivalent dipoles of EEG sources by the application of electrical field theory. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  J. C. Woestenburg,et al.  The removal of the eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain , 1983, Biological Psychology.

[27]  P. Venables,et al.  A Manual of Psychophysiological Methods , 1967 .

[28]  Emmanuel Chigozie Ifeachor INVESTIGATION OF OCULAR ARTEFACTS IN THE HUMAN EEG AND THEIR REMOVAL BY A MICROPROCESSOR-BASED INSTRUMENT , 1984 .

[29]  R. Bickford,et al.  Electric activity produced by eye flutter simulating frontal electroencephalographic rhythms. , 1958, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[30]  W BARRY,et al.  INFLUENCE OF EYE LID MOVEMENT UPON ELECTRO-OCULOGRAPHIC RECORDING OF VERTICAL EYE MOVEMENTS. , 1965, Aerospace medicine.

[31]  T. Gasser,et al.  Correction of EOG artifacts in event-related potentials of the EEG: aspects of reliability and validity. , 1982, Psychophysiology.

[32]  T. Gasser,et al.  The transfer of EOG activity into the EEG for eyes open and closed. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  D. Overton,et al.  Distribution of eye movement and eyeblink potentials over the scalp. , 1969, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  G H SULLIVAN,et al.  Impedance oculograph--a new technique. , 1963, Journal of applied physiology.

[35]  E. C. Ifeachor,et al.  New online method for removing ocular artefacts from EEG signals , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[36]  C. Fortgens,et al.  Removal of eye movement and ECG artifacts from the non-cephalic reference EEG. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  Emanuel Donchin Methodological issues in CNV research , 1973 .

[38]  F. Matsuo,et al.  Electrical phenomena associated with movements of the eyelid. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[39]  John S. Barlow,et al.  Computerized Clinical Electroencephalography in Perspective , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  M. Low,et al.  Surface‐negative, slow‐potential shift associated with conditioning in man , 1966, Neurology.

[41]  Nigel R. Hudson,et al.  The Application of Pattern Recognition Techniques to the Contingent Negative Variation for the Differentiation of Subject Categories , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  R P Borda,et al.  Use of a simple visual display to reduce eye movement artifacts in CNV recordings. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  H. Moldofsky,et al.  A spectral method for removing eye movement artifacts from the EEG. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[44]  A FORD,et al.  Significance of terminal transients in electro-oculographic recordings. , 1959, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[45]  R. Hari,et al.  Magnetic fields produced by eye blinking. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[46]  V. Reiman,et al.  Korrelationsanalyse von EEG und augenbewegungen beim menschen , 1974 .

[47]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Chapter 8 – Methodological Issues in CNV Research , 1974 .

[48]  P. Lang,et al.  The effects of eye fixation and stimulus and response location on the contingent negative variation (CNV). , 1973, Biological psychology.