Selection of Packaging Systems in Supply Chains from a Sustainability Perspective: The Case of Volvo

The purpose of this article is to develop an evaluation model for the selection of packaging systems in supply chains from a sustainability perspective. A theoretical evaluation model for comparing cost efficiency and the environmental impact of packaging systems in supply chains are developed from literature. The model is tested in a case study of a supply chain involving Volvo Car Corporation and Volvo Logistics Corporation, comparing the use of newly developed, one-way packaging with the sustainability of returnable packaging. The model compares the environmental and economic impacts of two packaging systems in a specific supply chain. The criteria used in the model are (i) packaging fill rate, (ii) packaging material, (iii) transport, (iv) material handling, (v) waste handling and (vi) administration. In the case study, the one-way packaging resulted in fewer economic and environmental impacts, thereby indicating the importance for companies to question their packaging systems. The model has been tested on one component in a case study. It provides a comparison of the packaging choices included using comparative, but not absolute, figures for the economic and environmental impacts. Managers can use the model to compare packaging systems for component supply and determine the most sustainable packaging from environmental and economic perspectives. The case study indicated that the returnable packaging system commonly used in the automotive industry is not always preferable in terms of sustainability. The article fulfils the need to evaluate the impact of packaging systems on supply chain sustainability in terms of economic and environmental criteria. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Less)

[1]  Santhanam Harit,et al.  A decision support system for container design in production systems , 1997 .

[2]  Ole Jørgen Hanssen,et al.  Sustainable packaging design: a holistic methodology for packaging design , 2010 .

[3]  E. Peereboom,et al.  Influence of Inventory Data Sets on Life‐Cycle Assessment Results: A Case Study on PVC , 1998 .

[4]  Helias A. Udo de Haes,et al.  Applications of life cycle assessment: expectations, drawbacks and perspectives , 1993 .

[5]  Leif Enarsson,et al.  Evaluation of suppliers: how to consider the environment , 1998 .

[6]  Haw‐Jan Wu,et al.  Environmentally responsible logistics systems , 1995 .

[7]  Leon F. McGinnis,et al.  An economic and environmental framework for analyzing globally sourced auto parts packaging system , 2008 .

[8]  Xun Xu,et al.  A simplified life cycle assessment of re‐usable and single‐use bulk transit packaging , 2004 .

[9]  Leigh Sparks,et al.  The New German Packaging Laws , 1994 .

[10]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Nord 1995:20: Nordic guidelines on life-cycle assessment , 1995 .

[11]  Caroline Bramklev.  On a proposal for a generic package development process , 2009 .

[12]  Claire Early,et al.  Informing Packaging Design Decisions at Toyota Motor Sales Using Life Cycle Assessment and Costing , 2009 .

[13]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Thinking outside ‘the Box’: Designing a Packaging Take-Back System , 2004 .

[14]  G. Robertson.  Good and Bad Packaging: Who Decides? , 1990 .

[15]  D. Rogers,et al.  A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory , 2008 .

[16]  Richard A. Lancioni,et al.  The Role of Packaging in International Logistics , 1990 .

[17]  Diane A. Mollenkopf,et al.  ASSESSING THE VIABILITY OF REUSABLE PACKAGING: A RELATIVE COST APPROACH , 2005 .

[18]  Jacquetta Lee,et al.  Critical review of life cycle analysis and assessment techniques and their application to commercial activities , 1995 .

[19]  Ola Johansson,et al.  Supply chain integration obtained through uniquely labelled goods: A survey of Swedish manufacturing industries , 2009 .

[20]  John R. Ehrenfeld,et al.  The Importance of LCAs—Warts and All , 1997 .

[21]  Tomas Engström,et al.  Data collection and analysis of manual work using video recording and personal computer techniques , 1997 .

[22]  Chris Dominic,et al.  Packaging scorecard – a packaging performance evaluation method , 2003 .

[23]  Changfeng Ge.  Efficient Packaging Design in Logistics , 1996 .

[24]  Martin Dubiel,et al.  Costing structures of reusable packaging systems , 1996 .

[25]  Mats I. Johansson,et al.  Materials supply systems design in product development projects , 2006 .

[26]  Leo Kroon,et al.  Returnable containers: an example of reverse logistics , 1995 .

[27]  Gunilla Jönson,et al.  Packaging handling evaluation methods in the grocery retail industry , 2001 .

[28]  Daniel Hellström,et al.  Packaging and logistics interactions in retail supply chains , 2007 .

[29]  Carlo Vezzoli,et al.  A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable and Reusable Packaging for the Distribution of Italian Fruit and Vegetables , 2011 .

[30]  Ola Johansson,et al.  The effect of asset visibility on managing returnable transport items , 2007 .

[31]  Helen Lewis,et al.  Evaluating the sustainability impacts of packaging: the plastic carry bag dilemma , 2010 .

[32]  Kees Sonneveld.  The role of life cycle assessment as a decision support tool for packaging , 2000 .

[33]  A. Lockamy.  A Conceptual Framework For Assessing Strategic Packaging Decisions , 1995 .

[34]  Diana Twede,et al.  Supply Chain Issues in Reusable Packaging , 2004 .

[35]  Adam C. Faruk,et al.  Analyzing, Mapping, and Managing Environmental Impacts along Supply Chains , 2001 .