Exploring the Correspondence between Total Quality Management and Peter Senge's Disciplines of a Learning Organization: A Taiwan Perspective

Abstract The most important part of Total Quality Management (TQM) is pursuing continuous improvement in all aspects of organization, whereas a Learning Organization (LO) denotes learning principles that eventually lead to organization learning and growth. Because these principles seek similar goals, to investigate the association of these philosophies is of great value to management. The primary purpose of this paper is to explore the correspondence between TQM and LO. A group of evaluators consisting of academic scholars, business consultants as well as industry practitioners, judged the relative strength of the relationship between TQM constructs and Senge's five disciplines of learning organization. By applying correspondence analysis and cluster analysis, the result exhibits that close correspondence emerges between TQM and LO. Moreover, TQM constructs and LO disciplines are located on a two-dimensional coordination of a management map, in which dimensions of the measurability and the diffusibility are inferred and managerial implications from these dimensions are articulated. Finally, this study subsequently identifies three distinctive association groups composed of TQM constructs and LO disciplines. These groups are further defined as individual dominant, higher authority and product/material oriented.

[1]  Joseph Moses Juran,et al.  Quality-control handbook , 1951 .

[2]  Jayant V. Saraph,et al.  An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality Management , 1989 .

[3]  Steve Pool,et al.  The learning organization: motivating employees by integrating TQM philosophy in a supportive organizational culture , 2000 .

[4]  S. S. Rao,et al.  A Framework for International Quality Management Research: Development and Validation of a Measurement Instrument , 1999 .

[5]  Armand V. Feigenbaum,et al.  Total quality control , 1961 .

[6]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[7]  David A. Garvin,et al.  Learning in Action: A Guide to Putting the Learning Organization to Work , 2000 .

[8]  Svetlana. Cicmil.  Achieving completeness through TQ principles and organizational learning , 1997 .

[9]  Sanjay L. Ahire.  Management Science—Total Quality Management Interfaces: An Integrative Framework , 1997 .

[10]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[11]  A. Wierdsma,et al.  Becoming a learning organization : beyond the learning curve , 1992 .

[12]  Ross L Chapman,et al.  TQM in Continuous‐process Manufacturing: Dow‐Corning (Australia) Pty Ltd , 1991 .

[13]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  Is there a link between total quality management and learning organizations , 1995 .

[14]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND AN ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT , 1994 .

[15]  J. Ruiz-Navarro,et al.  Strategies of Renewal , 2005 .

[16]  M. Greenacre,et al.  Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences. , 1995 .

[17]  Fenghueih Huarng,et al.  TQM adoption by hospitals in Taiwan , 2002 .

[18]  L. J. Porter,et al.  Identification of the Critical Factors of TQM , 1996 .

[19]  Kostas N. Dervitsiotis,et al.  The challenge of managing organizational change: Exploring the relationship of re-engineering, developing learning organizations and total quality management , 1998 .

[20]  Everett E. Adam,et al.  Alternative quality improvement practices and organization performance , 1994 .

[21]  John S. Oakland,et al.  The links between people management, customer satisfaction and business results , 1998 .

[22]  Sanjay L. Ahire,et al.  TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT: A LITERATURE REVIEW AND AN AGENDA FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1995 .

[23]  Subir Ghosh,et al.  Multivariate analysis, design of experiments, and survey sampling , 2000 .