Large-scale tactical urbanism: the Denver bike share system

How did one of the most historically automobile-dependent US cities end up with the first large-scale modern US bike-sharing system? The story reveals that it is less about transportation demand planning and engineering and more about the principles of what has been termed tactical urbanism. The tactical urbanism movement revolves around the idea that temporary interventions can help one understand what interventions might work in a particular context and lay the foundation for more permanent ones. That the first large-scale bike-sharing system in the US began as such an intervention is quite remarkable and illustrative of the potential of this strategy to build public aspiration and political will via temporary, short-term empirical success. Beginning with preparations for the 2008 Democratic National Convention (DNC) in Denver, Colorado, this paper details what went into creating the temporary Freewheel!n bike-share system and how that was able to be leveraged into a permanent bike-sharing system, Denver B-Cycle, two years later. Consistent with the characteristics of tactical urbanism, the partnerships formed with the temporary DNC implementation served as a catalyst. The paper then identifies lessons that other cities can learn and apply in similar large-scale tactical urbanism interventions.

[1]  A. Sutcliffe,et al.  Towards the Planned City: Germany, Britain, the United States and France 1780-1914 , 1981 .

[2]  I. Masser,et al.  Learning from Other Countries: The Cross-National Dimension in Urban Policy Making , 1986 .

[3]  J. Nasr,et al.  Urbanism : imported or exported? , 2003 .

[4]  P J DeMaio,et al.  SMART BIKES: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY , 2003 .

[5]  A. King.  Spaces of Global Cultures: Architecture, Urbanism, Identity , 2004 .

[6]  Paul DeMaio,et al.  WILL SMART BIKES SUCCEED AS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN THE UNITED STATES , 2004 .

[7]  Martin A. Andresen,et al.  Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle , 2005 .

[9]  P. Rietveld,et al.  Acces to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use , 2009 .

[10]  M. Callon,et al.  Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy , 2009 .

[11]  Karen Lucas.  Actual and Perceived Car Dependence , 2009 .

[12]  Eugene J. McCann,et al.  Relationality/territoriality: Toward a conceptualization of cities in the world , 2010 .

[13]  S. Shaheen,et al.  Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia , 2010 .

[14]  Norman W. Garrick,et al.  Street network types and road safety: A study of 24 California cities , 2010 .

[15]  Scienze Politiche.  American Community Survey , 2011 .

[16]  W. Marshall,et al.  Research Article: Evidence on Why Bike-Friendly Cities Are Safer for All Road Users , 2011 .

[17]  Q. Shen,et al.  Bike-Sharing Systems in Beijing, Shanghai, and Hangzhou and Their Impact on Travel Behavior , 2011 .

[18]  Hua Zhang,et al.  HANGZHOU PUBLIC BICYCLE: UNDERSTANDING EARLY ADOPTION AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE TO BIKESHARING IN HANGZHOU, CHINA , 2011 .

[19]  Michaela Mueller.  Acting in An Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy , 2011 .

[20]  Stacey Guzman,et al.  China's Hangzhou Public Bicycle , 2011 .

[21]  D. Rojas-Rueda,et al.  The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  Colin McFarlane,et al.  The city as a machine for learning. , 2011 .

[23]  Norman W Garrick,et al.  Does street network design affect traffic safety? , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Simon Washington,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to public bicycle scheme use : a qualitative approach , 2012 .

[25]  Andrew L Duvall.  Public bicycle sharing as a population-scale health intervention for active transportation in Denver, Colorado , 2012 .

[26]  Simon Washington,et al.  Understanding the fear of bicycle riding in Australia , 2012 .

[27]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator and User Understanding , 2012 .

[28]  F. ogilvie,et al.  Inequalities in usage of a public bicycle sharing scheme: socio-demographic predictors of uptake and usage of the London (UK) cycle hire scheme. , 2012, Preventive medicine.

[29]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Bike Lanes and Other Determinants of Capital Bikeshare Trips , 2012 .

[30]  Mariko Mura Davidson,et al.  Tactical urbanism, public policy reform, and 'innovation spotting' by government : from Park(ing) Day to San Francisco's parklet program , 2013 .

[31]  Simon Washington,et al.  Bike Share: A Synthesis of the Literature , 2013 .

[32]  Norman W. Garrick,et al.  Community design, street networks, and public health , 2014, Advances in Transportation and Health.

[33]  Krista Nordback,et al.  Bicyclist safety performance functions for a U.S. city. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Simon Washington,et al.  Bike share's impact on car use: evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia , 2014 .