Numerical Study of Droplet Generation Process in a Microfluidic Flow Focusing

Microfluidic flow focusing devices have been utilized for droplet generation on account of its superior control over droplet size. Droplet based microfluidics addressed many scientific issues by providing a novel technological platform for applications such as biology, pharmaceutical industry, biomedical studies and drug delivery. This study numerically investigated the droplet generation process of an aqueous flow in oleic acid oil in a microfluidic flow focusing device. A conservative level set method is conducted to numerically model the droplet generation process. The post processing of the simulation results are done using Canny edge detection image processing method, which is a novel approach. Moreover, the results of the numerical simulation were compared to the experimental data provided by Ten et al. on the same device. This method showed a maximum average deviation from the experimental results of 14.6% and a minimum of 6.96%. Also, by means of altering water and oil flows, the influence of parameters affecting droplet size, which lead to a better understanding of droplet generation phenomenon, was investigated in this study. Therefore, it can be concluded that the flow ratio and capillary number are the two primary parameters that affect droplet size, while capillary number showed more dominance in comparison to flow ratio.

[1]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Mitra Basu,et al.  Gaussian-based edge-detection methods - a survey , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[3]  A. Lee,et al.  1-Million droplet array with wide-field fluorescence imaging for digital PCR. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[4]  Wingki Lee,et al.  Role of geometry and fluid properties in droplet and thread formation processes in planar flow focusing , 2009 .

[5]  G. Kreiss,et al.  A conservative level set method for two phase flow II , 2005, Journal of Computational Physics.

[6]  H. Stone,et al.  Formation of dispersions using “flow focusing” in microchannels , 2003 .

[7]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  Monodispersed microfluidic droplet generation by shear focusing microfluidic device , 2006 .

[8]  Luis Rojas-Solórzano,et al.  Numerical simulation of droplet formation in a microchannel device , 2013 .

[9]  Chunsun Zhang,et al.  PCR microfluidic devices for DNA amplification. , 2006, Biotechnology advances.

[10]  Andrew D Griffiths,et al.  Miniaturising the laboratory in emulsion droplets. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.

[11]  Jr-Lung Lin,et al.  Integrated polymerase chain reaction chips utilizing digital microfluidics , 2006, Biomedical microdevices.

[12]  Yonghao Zhang,et al.  Microfluidic DNA amplification--a review. , 2009, Analytica chimica acta.

[13]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Mechanism for flow-rate controlled breakup in confined geometries: a route to monodisperse emulsions. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[14]  S. Anna,et al.  Microfluidic methods for generating continuous droplet streams , 2007 .

[15]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Emulsification in a microfluidic flow-focusing device: effect of the viscosities of the liquids , 2008 .

[16]  Jing Liu,et al.  Numerical simulation of droplet-based microfluidics , 2010 .

[17]  Krishnaswamy Nandakumar,et al.  Numerical Study of Droplet Formation Inside a Microfluidic Flow-Focusing Device , 2012 .