Paired-associate learning by normal children and retardates with relevant redundant compound stimuli.

[1]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Stimulus Selection and Meaningfulness at Different Stages of Paired-Associate Learning. , 1972 .

[2]  E. Butterfield,et al.  Response familiarization and the paired-associate performance of noninstitutionalized retarded and normal children. , 1970, American journal of mental deficiency.

[3]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Single-letter cue selection in the paired-associate learning of normal children and retardates. , 1970, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Partial Redundancy and Cue Selection , 1970 .

[5]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Effects of secondary cues on rote verbal learning of retardates and normal children. , 1969, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[6]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Context Stimuli in Verbal Paired-Associate Learning by Normal Children and Retardates , 1968 .

[7]  W. Otto.  Elementary pupils' use of cues in paired‐associate learning , 1968 .

[8]  E. Lovelace.  Cue selection in paired-associate learning: Meaningfulness and position , 1968 .

[9]  C. T. James,et al.  Stimulus selection at different stages of paired-associate learning. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  I. Birnbaum.  Context stimuli in verbal learning and the persistence of associative factors. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  B. Underwood,et al.  Cue selection in paired-associate learning. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  R. L. Solso.  Functional stimulus selection as related to color versus verbal stimuli. , 1968 .

[13]  B. Underwood,et al.  Meaningfulness and verbal learning , 1960 .