How to Schedule Multiple Graphical Representations? A Classroom Experiment With an Intelligent Tutoring System for Fractions

Providing learners with multiple representations of the learning content has been shown to enhance learning outcomes. When designing problem sequences with multiple representations, designers of intelligent tutoring systems must decide how to schedule the representations. Prior research on contextual interference has demonstrated that interleaving different types of learning tasks can foster a deep understanding of the underlying concepts. Do the same advantages apply to interleaving representations? In a classroom experiment, we compared four conditions that varied the practice schedules of multiple graphical representations between interleaving and blocking. The multiple-representation conditions were compared to three single-representation control conditions. During their regular classroom instruction, 290 4 and 5-grade students worked for five hours with versions of an intelligent tutoring system for fractions. On several dependent measures, interleaving multiple graphical representations led to better learning results than blocking multiple graphical representations. Findings from a think-aloud study give insight into the underlying cognitive processes.

[1]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  A New Paradigm for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Example-Tracing Tutors , 2009, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[2]  S. Ainsworth DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[3]  Hans Spada,et al.  Acquiring knowledge in science and mathematics : the use of multiple representations in technology based learning environments , 1998 .

[4]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[5]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Blocked versus Interleaved Practice with Multiple Representations in an Intelligent Tutoring System for Fractions , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[6]  Example-Tracing Tutors : A New Paradigm for Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2008 .

[7]  Charalambos Y. Charalambous,et al.  Drawing on a Theoretical Model to Study Students’ Understandings of Fractions , 2007 .

[8]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[9]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems with Multiple Representations and Self-Explanation Prompts Support Learning of Fractions , 2009, AIED.

[10]  Fred Paas,et al.  High versus low contextual interference in simulation-based training of troubleshooting skills: effects on transfer performance and invested mental effort , 1998 .

[11]  R. Rumberger Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods: and. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992. (ISBN 0-8039-4627-9), pp. xvi + 265. Price: U.S. $45.00 (cloth) , 1997 .