Multi-scale effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on lesser prairie-chicken populations of the US Southern Great Plains

Large-scale patterns of land use and fragmentation have been associatedwith the decline of many imperiled wildlife populations. Lesserprairie-chickens(Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) are restricted to thesouthernGreat Plains of North America, and their population and range have declined by> 90% over the past 100 years. Our objective was to examine scale-dependentrelationships between landscape structure and change and long-term populationtrends for lesser prairie-chicken populations in the southern Great Plains. Weused a geographic information system (GIS) to quantify landscape composition,pattern and change at multiple scales (extents) for fragmented agriculturallandscapes surrounding 10 lesser prairie-chicken leks. Trend analysis oflong-term population data was used to classify each population and landscape(declined, sustained). We analyzed metrics of landscape structure and changeusing a repeated measures analysis of variance to determine significant effects(α = 0.10) between declining and sustained landscapes across multiplescales. Four metrics of landscape structure and change (landscape change index,percent cropland, increases in tree-dominated cover types, and changes in edgedensity) contained significant interactions between population status andscale,indicating different scaling effects on landscapes with declining and stablepopulations. Any single spatial scale that was evaluated would not have givencomplete results of the influences of landscape structure and change on lesserprairie-chicken populations. The smallest spatial scales (452, 905, and 1,810ha) predicted that changes in edge density and largest patch sizewere the only important variables, while large-scale analysis (7,238ha) suggested that the amount of cropland, increase in trees(mostly Juniperus virginiana), and general landscapechanges were most important. Changes in landscape structure over the pastseveral decades had stronger relationships with dynamics of lesserprairie-chicken populations than current landscape structure. Observed changessuggest that these local populations may be appropriately viewed from ametapopulation perspective and future conservation efforts should evaluateeffects of fragmentation on dispersal, colonization, and extinction patterns.

[1]  Alan H. Cutler.  Nested Faunas and Extinction in Fragmented Habitats , 1991 .

[2]  F. S. Guthery,et al.  Fall-Winter Movements, Ranges, and Habitat Use of Lesser Prairie Chickens , 1980 .

[3]  M. Vavra,et al.  Summary: Ecological implications of livestock herbivory in the West. , 1994 .

[4]  R. O'Neill,et al.  A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[5]  S. Fuhlendorf,et al.  Simulation of a fire-sensitive ecological threshold: a case study of Ashe juniper on the Edwards Plateau of Texas, USA. , 1996 .

[6]  K. Giesen.  Movements and Nesting Habitat of Lesser Prairie-Chicken Hens in Colorado , 1994 .

[7]  K. Kershaw.  The Use of Cover and Frequency in the Detection of Pattern in Plant Communities , 1957 .

[8]  R. Fritz.  Consequences of insular population structure: Distribution and extinction of spruce grouse populations , 2004, Oecologia.

[9]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Scale-dependent proximity of wildlife habitat in a spatially-neutral Bayesian model , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[11]  M. Wisdom,et al.  Vegetative characteristics of successful and unsuccessful nests of lesser prairie chickens , 1992 .

[12]  H. Andrén,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review , 1994 .

[13]  J. Bissonette,et al.  The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation , 1998, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  A. S. Jackson,et al.  The Lesser Prairie Chicken in the Texas Panhandle , 1963 .

[15]  J. Aldrich.  Geographic Orientation of American Tetraonidae , 1963 .

[16]  Dawn M. Burke,et al.  Landscape and area effects on beetle assemblages in Ontario , 1998 .

[17]  Thomas Maxwell,et al.  Resolution and predictability: An approach to the scaling problem , 1994, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Quantitative Ecology: Spatial and Temporal Scaling , 1995 .

[19]  S. Archer,et al.  Woody plant encroachment into southwestern grasslands and savannas: rates, patterns and proximate causes. , 1994 .

[20]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[21]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[22]  Chris R. Dickman,et al.  The use of habitat mosaics by terrestrial vertebrate fauna: implications for conservation and management , 1998, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[23]  A. M. Olson,et al.  Role of scale and environmental factors in regulation of community structure. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  M. Ryan,et al.  Breeding Ecology of Greater Prairie-chickens (Tympanuchus cupido) in Relation to Prairie Landscape Configuration , 1998 .

[25]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology , 1993 .

[26]  J. Sauer,et al.  Survey designs and statistical methods for the estimation of avian population trends , 1990 .

[27]  E. Bolen,et al.  Effects of Land Use on Lesser Prairie Chickens in Texas , 1976 .

[28]  V. Saab.  IMPORTANCE OF SPATIAL SCALE TO HABITAT USE BY BREEDING BIRDS IN RIPARIAN FORESTS: A HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[29]  J. Wiens.  Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[30]  E. J. S.,et al.  Quantitative Plant Ecology , 1934, Nature.

[31]  Kathryn E. Freemark,et al.  Effects of landscape structure on nest predation in roadsides of a midwestern agroecosystem: a multiscale analysis , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[32]  D. Engle,et al.  AVIAN RESPONSE TO LANDSCAPE CHANGE IN FRAGMENTED SOUTHERN GREAT PLAINS GRASSLANDS , 2001 .

[33]  R. Littell.  SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[34]  G Sugihara,et al.  Applications of fractals in ecology. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  Almo Farina,et al.  Landscape Ecology in Action , 2000, Springer Netherlands.

[36]  H. Stommel,et al.  Varieties of Oceanographic Experience: The ocean can be investigated as a hydrodynamical phenomenon as well as explored geographically. , 1963, Science.

[37]  K. McGarigal,et al.  Relationships Between Landscape Structure and Breeding Birds in the Oregon Coast Range , 1995 .

[38]  N. D. Niemuth,et al.  Land use and vegetation associated with greater prairie-chicken leks in an agricultural landscape. , 2000 .

[39]  Robert E. Jones.  Identification and Analysis of Lesser and Greater Prairie Chicken Habitat , 1963 .

[40]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Landscape Heterogeneity and Ungulate Dynamics: What Spatial Scales are Important? , 1997 .

[41]  John R. Skalski,et al.  Determination of ecological scale , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[42]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Population Dynamics in Complex Landscapes: A Case Study. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[43]  T. Tscharntke.  Fragmentation of Phragmites Habitats, Minimum Viable Population Size, Habitat Suitability, and Local Extinction of Moths, Midges, Flies, Aphids, and Birds , 1992 .

[44]  R. W. Cannon,et al.  Lesser Prairie Chicken Densities on Shinnery Oak and Sand Sagebrush Rangelands in Oklahoma , 1981 .

[45]  John A. Bissonette,et al.  Wildlife and Landscape Ecology , 1997, Springer New York.

[46]  Arthur S. Lieberman,et al.  Landscape Ecology , 1994, Springer New York.

[47]  S. Fuhlendorf,et al.  Spatial scale influence on longterm temporal patterns of a semi-arid grassland , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[48]  R. Holt,et al.  A Survey and Overview of Habitat Fragmentation Experiments , 2000 .

[49]  H. Stommel,et al.  Varieties of Oceanographic Experience , 1963 .

[50]  A. Poole,et al.  Lesser Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) , 1998 .

[51]  S. Levin.  THE PROBLEM OF PATTERN AND SCALE IN ECOLOGY , 1992 .

[52]  Julio L. Betancourt,et al.  APPLIED HISTORICAL ECOLOGY: USING THE PAST TO MANAGE FOR THE FUTURE , 1999 .

[53]  J. Rotenberry,et al.  GHOSTS OF HABITATS PAST: CONTRIBUTION OF LANDSCAPE CHANGE TO CURRENT HABITATS USED BY SHRUBLAND BIRDS , 2000 .

[54]  R. O'Neill.  A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. , 1986 .

[55]  Mark E. Ritchie,et al.  Populations in a Landscape Context: Sources, Sinks, and Metapopulations , 1997 .

[56]  V. T. Parker,et al.  Ecological scale : theory and applications , 1999 .

[57]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Quantitative methods in landscape ecology : the analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity , 1991 .

[58]  R. Brooks,et al.  Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communities , 1997, Landscape Ecology.

[59]  D. Engle,et al.  Effects of Grazing on Restoration of Southern Mixed Prairie Soils , 2002 .

[60]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Fractal patterns of insect movement in microlandscape mosaics , 1995 .

[61]  S. Fuhlendorf,et al.  Influence of Landscape Composition and Change on Lesser Prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) Populations , 2001 .

[62]  S. M. Glenn,et al.  Disturbances in tallgrass prairie: local and regional effects on community heterogeneity , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[63]  J. Rappole,et al.  Predation on artificial nests in large forest blocks , 1994 .

[64]  John A. Bissonette,et al.  Scale-Sensitive Ecological Properties: Historical Context, Current Meaning , 1997 .