Source apportionment of diesel and spark ignition exhaust aerosol using on-road data from the Minneapolis metropolitan area

Abstract Air quality measurements were made on interstate highways in the Minneapolis metropolitan area. Gas and aerosol concentrations were measured on weekdays and weekends. By exploiting the difference in the relative volumes of heavy duty (HD) diesel and light duty (LD) spark ignition (SI) vehicles on weekdays and weekends, we were able to estimate apportioned fuel specific emissions. The on-road, apportioned, fuel specific particle number emissions factors, estimated from condensation particle counter (CPC) measurements were 1.34±0.2×1016 particles kg−1 for diesels and 7.1±1.6×1015 particles kg−1 for spark ignition vehicles. Estimates from the scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) measurements were 2.1±0.3×1015 particles kg−1 for diesels and 3.9±0.6×1014 particles kg−1 for SI vehicles. The difference between CPC and SMPS measurements is mainly due to different lower size detection limits of the instruments, ∼3 and ∼10 nm, respectively. On a weekly weighted basis and on weekdays, the majority of particle number was attributed to HD diesel traffic. Weekend production of particles can be primarily attributed to light duty SI automobiles. On a per vehicle basis, HD vehicles produced substantially greater numbers of particles. On a fuel specific basis, HD vehicles produce slightly higher concentrations of particles than light duty vehicles. The relative contribution of LD vehicles to particle number emissions increased as particle size decreased. The HD apportioned size distributions were similar to size distributions measured during other on-road and laboratory studies. The LD apportioned size distribution was bounded by laboratory and on-road size distributions. Our work is representative of summer, highway cruise conditions. It is likely that under cold start and high load operating conditions LD emissions will increase relative to HD emissions.

[1]  Finn Palmgren,et al.  Experimental studies of ultrafine particles in streets and the relationship to traffic , 2001 .

[2]  Zoran Ristovski,et al.  New methods of determination of average particle emission factors for two groups of vehicles on a busy road , 2004 .

[3]  Barbara Zielinska,et al.  Real-world automotive emissions—Summary of studies in the Fort McHenry and Tuscarora mountain tunnels , 1995 .

[4]  Simone Hochgreb,et al.  Particulate Matter Emission During Start-up and Transient Operation of a Spark-Ignition Engine (2): Effect of Speed, Load, and Real-World Driving Cycles , 2000 .

[5]  D. J. Rickeard,et al.  Exhaust Particulate Size Distribution: Vehicle and Fuel Influences in Light Duty Vehicles , 1996 .

[6]  M. Utell,et al.  Acute health effects of ambient air pollution: the ultrafine particle hypothesis. , 2000, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.

[7]  C. Goodfellow,et al.  A Study of the Size, Number and Mass Distribution of the Automotive ParticulateEmissions from European Light Duty Vehicles , 1998 .

[8]  W. MacNee,et al.  Particulate air pollution and acute health effects , 1995, The Lancet.

[9]  William R. Pierson,et al.  Particulate Matter Associated with Vehicles on the Road , 1976 .

[10]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  Examination of the Size-Resolved and Transient Nature of Motor Vehicle Particle Emissions , 1999 .

[11]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles , 2000, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[12]  L Morawska,et al.  A model for determination of motor vehicle emission factors from on-road measurements with a focus on submicrometer particles. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  S. Greenwood,et al.  An Investigation to Determine the Exhaust Particulate Size Distributions for Diesel, Petrol, and Compressed Natural Gas Fuelled Vehicles , 1996 .

[14]  D. Dockery,et al.  An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Matthias Ketzel,et al.  Particle and trace gas emission factors under urban driving conditions in Copenhagen based on street and roof-level observations , 2003 .

[16]  P. T. Roberts,et al.  Weekday versus Weekend Activity Patterns for Ozone Precursor Emissions in California’s South Coast Air Basin , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[17]  C. Blanchard,et al.  Differences between Weekday and Weekend Air Pollutant Levels in Southern California , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[18]  W. MacNee,et al.  Ultrafine (nanometre) particle mediated lung injury , 1998 .

[19]  Werner A. Stahel,et al.  Aerosol emission in a road tunnel , 1997 .

[20]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  GASOLINE VEHICLE EXHAUST PARTICLE SAMPLING STUDY , 2003 .

[21]  Alberto Ayala,et al.  Estimation of Diffusion Losses when Sampling Diesel Aerosol: A Quality Assurance Measure , 2003 .

[22]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Differences in airborne particle and gaseous concentrations in urban air between weekdays and weekends , 2002 .

[23]  Christer Johansson,et al.  Model simulation of ultrafine particles inside a road tunnel , 2003 .

[24]  D. Dockery,et al.  Particulate air pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective study of U.S. adults. , 1995, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[25]  Stefan Hausberger,et al.  Roadside measurements of particulate matter size distribution , 2003 .

[26]  R. Harley,et al.  On-road measurement of fine particle and nitrogen oxide emissions from light- and heavy-duty motor vehicles , 1999 .

[27]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Nanoparticle emissions on Minnesota highways , 2004 .

[28]  Principal Investigator,et al.  DIESEL AEROSOL SAMPLING METHODOLOGY - CRC E-43 , 2002 .

[29]  D. Kittelson,et al.  Characterization of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from a Spark Ignition Engine , 1998 .

[30]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Diesel Aerosol Sampling in the Atmosphere , 2000 .

[31]  D. Kittelson Engines and nanoparticles: a review , 1998 .

[32]  John A. Gillies,et al.  Exhaust Particle Size Distribution Measurements at the Tuscarora Mountain Tunnel , 2002 .

[33]  A. Peters,et al.  Respiratory effects are associated with the number of ultrafine particles. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[34]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  GASOLINE VEHICLE PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS: COMPARISON OF STEADY STATE, FTP, AND US06 MEASUREMENTS , 1999 .