Neuronal noise as a physical resource for human cognition

A new class of energy-efficient digital microprocessor is being developed which is susceptible to thermal noise and consequently operates in probabilistic rather than conventional deterministic mode. Hybrid computing systems which combine probabilistic and deterministic processors can provide robust and efficient tools for computational problems that hitherto would be intractable by conventional deterministic algorithm. These developments suggest a revised perspective on the consequences of ion-channel noise in slender axons, often regarded as a hindrance to neuronal computations. It is proposed that the human brain is such an energy-efficient hybrid computational system whose remarkable characteristics emerge from constructive synergies between probabilistic and deterministic modes of operation. In particular, the capacity for intuition and creative problem solving appears to arise naturally from such a hybrid system. Bearing in mind that physical thermal noise is both pure and available at no cost, our proposal has implications for attempts to emulate the energy-efficient human brain on conventional energy-intensive deterministic supercomputers.

[1]  Ionel Michael Navon,et al.  A combined simulated annealing and quasi-Newton-like conjugate-gradient method for determining the structure of mixed argon-xenon clusters , 1990, Comput. Chem..

[2]  R. Penrose,et al.  Shadows of the Mind , 1994 .

[3]  L. Chittka,et al.  Travel Optimization by Foraging Bumblebees through Readjustments of Traplines after Discovery of New Feeding Locations , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[4]  Krishna V. Palem,et al.  Energy aware computing through probabilistic switching: a study of limits , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[5]  Cristian S. Calude,et al.  Quantum randomness and value indefiniteness , 2006, quant-ph/0611029.

[6]  Lorenz, G\"{o}del and Penrose: New perspectives on determinism and causality in fundamental physics , 2013, 1309.2396.

[7]  Bart Selman,et al.  Boosting Combinatorial Search Through Randomization , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[8]  Kurt Wiesenfeld,et al.  Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDs , 1995, Nature.

[10]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  A Turing test for free will , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  B. Baars,et al.  Consciousness, biology and quantum hypotheses. , 2012, Physics of life reviews.

[12]  K. Palem,et al.  Inexactness and a future of computing , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  H. Stapp The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes , 2000, quant-ph/0010029.

[14]  Peter D. Düben,et al.  On the use of inexact, pruned hardware in atmospheric modelling , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[15]  E. D’Angelo The human brain project. , 2012, Functional neurology.

[16]  Frank Moss,et al.  Noise enhancement of information transfer in crayfish mechanoreceptors by stochastic resonance , 1993, Nature.

[17]  A. Aldo Faisal,et al.  Stochastic Simulations on the Reliability of Action Potential Propagation in Thin Axons , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Ion-Channel Noise Places Limits on the Miniaturization of the Brain’s Wiring , 2005, Current Biology.

[19]  J. White,et al.  Channel noise in neurons , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  Margaret H. Wright,et al.  The opportunities and challenges of exascale computing , 2010 .

[21]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Spontaneous action potentials due to channel fluctuations. , 1996, Biophysical journal.