Structural analysis of large protein complexes using solvent paramagnetic relaxation enhancements.

Understanding the function of biomolecular complexes requires their structural analysis at atomic resolution. To solve high-resolution structures by ab initio calculations typically data from NMR spectroscopy or X-ray crystallography are employed. In the latter approach, intrinsic flexibility and dynamics may prevent crystallization or introduce artificial conformations linked to crystal packing. Solution NMR spectroscopy does not suffer from such limitations, but is demanding because the adverse relaxation properties of large complexes may lead to extensive signal broadening and severe spectral overlap. Consequently, only sparse restraints can be obtained from such complexes by NMR experiments. Provided that the structures of the individual components of the complex (i.e. proteins, DNA/RNA) are available and that no large-scale conformational changes occur upon complex formation, experimental and computational approaches can be used to obtain the quaternary arrangement of complexes. The assembly of protein complexes by (semi-)rigid-body/ torsion-angle dynamics protocols is widely used and can yield accurate and precise structural models. However, for highmolecular-weight complexes, conventional approaches become highly ambiguous and often cannot distinguish between several possible arrangements of subunits in the complex. Different types of NMR data can provide powerful complementary information for restraining the interface and orientation of the complex and thereby resolve these ambiguities. One technique that has gained popularity in recent years is the site-specific incorporation of paramagnetic spin labels or lanthanide binding tags. These labels are covalently attached to single cysteine residues and provide a rich source of distance (paramagnetic relaxation enhancements) and orientation information (pseudocontact shifts, PCS; residual dipolar couplings, RDCs). A potential drawback of this approach is the requirement of a single accessible cysteine residue for cross-linking with the paramagnetic tag. This requires removal of native cysteines by site-directed mutagenesis which can be difficult for large proteins (that may contain many cysteines). Here, we present an efficient, generally applicable, and robust strategy for improving the precision and accuracy of (semi-)rigid-body/torsion-angle dynamics protocols based on paramagnetic relaxation enhancements (PREs) derived from the soluble paramagnetic agent Gd(DTPA-BMA) (DTPA: diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid, BMA: bismethylamide). This chemically inert compound can simply be titrated to the sample, does not require any covalent modifications, and can be easily removed by dialysis. Dipolar interactions with the unpaired electron(s) of the chelated lanthanide ion (Gd) lead to a concentrationdependent increase of nuclear relaxation rates (PRE), which result, for example, in line broadening for NMR signals of nuclear spins. 6] The PRE can be translated into direct distance information that reflects the solvent accessibility or, in more quantitative terms, the (minimal) distance to the closest point of the molecular surface (Figure 1).

[1]  Michael J. E. Sternberg,et al.  The 4th meeting on the Critical Assessment of Predicted Interaction (CAPRI) held at the Mare Nostrum, Barcelona , 2010 .

[2]  Michael Sattler,et al.  NES consensus redefined by structures of PKI-type and Rev-type nuclear export signals bound to CRM1 , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[3]  I. Bertini,et al.  Structural analysis of protein interfaces from 13C direct-detected paramagnetic relaxation enhancements. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[4]  A. Bonvin,et al.  The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking , 2010, Nature Protocols.

[5]  Michael Nilges,et al.  An efficient protocol for NMR-spectroscopy-based structure determination of protein complexes in solution. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[6]  G. Otting,et al.  Paramagnetic labelling of proteins and oligonucleotides for NMR , 2010, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[7]  Klaus Zangger,et al.  Der Einsatz von Relaxationserhöhungen in einer paramagnetischen Umgebung zur Proteinstrukturbestimmung mit NMR‐Spektroskopie , 2009 .

[8]  K. Zangger,et al.  Use of relaxation enhancements in a paramagnetic environment for the structure determination of proteins using NMR spectroscopy. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[9]  G. Clore,et al.  Theory, practice, and applications of paramagnetic relaxation enhancement for the characterization of transient low-population states of biological macromolecules and their complexes. , 2009, Chemical reviews.

[10]  Andrea Bernini,et al.  Probing protein surface accessibility with solvent and paramagnetic molecules , 2009 .

[11]  P. Keizers,et al.  Intermolecular dynamics studied by paramagnetic tagging , 2009, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[12]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: New features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets , 2007, Proteins.

[13]  Stephen R Comeau,et al.  ClusPro: Performance in CAPRI rounds 6–11 and the new server , 2007, Proteins.

[14]  Shoshana J Wodak From the Mediterranean coast to the shores of Lake Ontario: CAPRI's premiere on the American continent , 2007, Proteins.

[15]  L. Fielding NMR methods for the determination of protein–ligand dissociation constants , 2007 .

[16]  R. Kehlenbach,et al.  CRM1-mediated nuclear export: to the pore and beyond. , 2007, Trends in cell biology.

[17]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Activity-structure correlations in divergent lectin evolution: fine specificity of chicken galectin CG-14 and computational analysis of flexible ligand docking for CG-14 and the closely related CG-16. , 2007, Glycobiology.

[18]  Walter Keller,et al.  Structural basis for nucleic acid and toxin recognition of the bacterial antitoxin CcdA. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Rolf Boelens,et al.  Information-driven protein–DNA docking using HADDOCK: it is a matter of flexibility , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  Stephen R. Comeau,et al.  PIPER: An FFT‐based protein docking program with pairwise potentials , 2006, Proteins.

[21]  Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin,et al.  Combining NMR Relaxation with Chemical Shift Perturbation Data to Drive Protein–protein Docking , 2006, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[22]  M. Blackledge Recent progress in the study of biomolecular structure and dynamics in solution from residual dipolar couplings , 2005 .

[23]  Ulrike Kutay,et al.  Leucine-rich nuclear-export signals: born to be weak. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[24]  J. Puglisi,et al.  Structure determination of large biological RNAs. , 2005, Methods in enzymology.

[25]  J. Prestegard,et al.  Residual dipolar couplings in structure determination of biomolecules. , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[26]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Model building of a protein-protein complexed structure using saturation transfer and residual dipolar coupling without paired intermolecular NOE , 2004, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[28]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes , 2004, Bioinform..

[29]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions , 2003, Proteins.

[30]  Michael Nilges,et al.  ARIA: automated NOE assignment and NMR structure calculation , 2003, Bioinform..

[31]  C. Dominguez,et al.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  G Marius Clore,et al.  Improving the accuracy of NMR structures of RNA by means of conformational database potentials of mean force as assessed by complete dipolar coupling cross-validation. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[33]  I. Bertini,et al.  Magnetic Susceptibility in Paramagnetic NMR , 2002 .

[34]  Nico Tjandra,et al.  NMR dipolar couplings for the structure determination of biopolymers in solution , 2002 .

[35]  Gerhard Wagner,et al.  TreeDock: a tool for protein docking based on minimizing van der Waals energies. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[36]  G. Otting,et al.  Identification of protein surfaces by NMR measurements with a pramagnetic Gd(III) chelate. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[37]  E. Zuiderweg,et al.  Mapping protein-protein interactions in solution by NMR spectroscopy. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[38]  A. Bax,et al.  Dipolar couplings in macromolecular structure determination. , 2001, Methods in enzymology.

[39]  P. Rosevear,et al.  Protein global fold determination using site‐directed spin and isotope labeling , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[40]  G M Clore,et al.  Accurate and rapid docking of protein-protein complexes on the basis of intermolecular nuclear overhauser enhancement data and dipolar couplings by rigid body minimization. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  G. Wagner,et al.  Utilization of site-directed spin labeling and high-resolution heteronuclear nuclear magnetic resonance for global fold determination of large proteins with limited nuclear overhauser effect data. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[42]  F. Bischoff,et al.  CRM1-mediated Recycling of Snurportin 1 to the Cytoplasm , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  Christian Griesinger,et al.  Heteronuclear multidimensional NMR experiments for the structure determination of proteins in solution employing pulsed field gradients , 1999 .

[44]  D. S. Garrett,et al.  Solution structure of the 40,000 Mr phosphoryl transfer complex between the N-terminal domain of enzyme I and HPr , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[45]  M. Ubbink,et al.  The structure of the complex of plastocyanin and cytochrome f, determined by paramagnetic NMR and restrained rigid-body molecular dynamics. , 1998, Structure.

[46]  G. Roberts,et al.  NMR of macromolecules : a practical approach , 1993 .

[47]  Nicolaas Bloembergen,et al.  Proton Relaxation Times in Paramagnetic Solutions. Effects of Electron Spin Relaxation , 1961 .

[48]  Nicolaas Bloembergen,et al.  Proton Relaxation Times in Paramagnetic Solutions , 1957 .

[49]  I. Solomon,et al.  Nuclear Magnetic Interactions in the HF Molecule , 1956 .

[50]  I. Solomon Relaxation Processes in a System of Two Spins , 1955 .