The consequences of four land‐use scenarios for forest ecosystems and the services they provide
暂无分享,去创建一个
E. Broadbent | A. Zambrano | D. Foster | Jonathan R. Thompson | K. Lambert | M. Blumstein | Yuanchao Fan
[1] Mark E. Borsuk,et al. Methods for translating narrative scenarios into quantitative assessments of land use change , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..
[2] Jonathan R. Thompson,et al. A LANDIS-II extension for incorporating land use and other disturbances , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..
[3] Jonathan R. Thompson,et al. Timber Harvesting Behaviour in Massachusetts, USA: Does Price Matter to Private Landowners? , 2016, Small-scale Forestry.
[4] Jonathan R. Thompson,et al. Land‐use impacts on the quantity and configuration of ecosystem service provisioning in Massachusetts, USA , 2015 .
[5] Jiangxiao Qiu,et al. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[6] Grazia Zulian,et al. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe , 2012 .
[7] Arnim Wiek,et al. Scenario Studies as a Synthetic and Integrative Research Activity for Long-Term Ecological Research , 2012 .
[8] D. Foster,et al. The influence of land use and climate change on forest biomass and composition in Massachusetts, USA. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.
[9] C. Dormann,et al. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead , 2011 .
[10] Kris A. Johnson,et al. The Impact of Land-Use Change on Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Returns to Landowners: A Case Study in the State of Minnesota , 2011 .
[11] Sara B. Levin,et al. Factors influencing riverine fish assemblages in Massachusetts , 2011 .
[12] Laura Schmitt Olabisi,et al. Using Scenario Visioning and Participatory System Dynamics Modeling to Investigate the Future: Lessons from Minnesota 2050 , 2010 .
[13] A. Shvidenko,et al. Predicting global change effects on forest biomass and composition in south-central Siberia. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.
[14] W. Keeton,et al. Wildland and Woodlands: A Forest Vision for New England , 2010 .
[15] John W. Coulston,et al. The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database Version 4.0: Database Description and Users Manual for Phase 3 , 2010 .
[16] Garry D. Peterson,et al. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.
[17] K. Johnson,et al. Research, part of a Special Feature on Historical and Future Ranges of Variability Is There Potential for the Historical Range of Variability to Guide Conservation Given the Social Range of Variability? , 2009 .
[18] G. Daily,et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .
[19] B. Butler,et al. Estimating ownerships and parcels of nonindustrial private forestland in Massachusetts , 2008 .
[20] Claire A. Montgomery,et al. Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns , 2008 .
[21] Joseph Alcamo,et al. Chapter Two Towards Guidelines for Environmental Scenario Analysis , 2008 .
[22] Christopher J. Bellucci. Stormwater and Aquatic Life: Making the Connection Between Impervious Cover and Aquatic Life Impairments for TMDL Development in Connecticut Streams , 2007 .
[23] Elinor Ostrom,et al. Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Science.
[24] G. Daily,et al. Evaluating the Potential for Conservation Development: Biophysical, Economic, and Institutional Perspectives , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[25] S. Carpenter,et al. Ecology for transformation. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[26] D. Foster,et al. Forest harvesting and land-use conversion over two decades in Massachusetts , 2006 .
[27] C. Jaeger,et al. Science-based stakeholder dialogues: Theories and tools , 2006 .
[28] S. Klein,et al. GFDL's CM2 Global Coupled Climate Models. Part I: Formulation and Simulation Characteristics , 2006 .
[29] S. Carpenter,et al. Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.
[30] D. Mladenoff,et al. A spatially interactive simulation of climate change, harvesting, wind, and tree species migration and projected changes to forest composition and biomass in northern Wisconsin, USA , 2005 .
[31] M. D. Anderson,et al. Ecosystem Management across Ownerships: the Potential for Collision with Antitrust Laws , 2004 .
[32] Jeffrey R. Deacon,et al. Estimation of Total Nitrogen and Phosphorus in New England Streams Using Spatially Referenced Regression Models , 2004 .
[33] Paul C. Sutton,et al. SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets , 2002 .
[34] Alexei G. Sankovski,et al. Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .
[35] Alexei G. Sankovski,et al. Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .
[36] Hong S. He,et al. Spatial simulation of forest succession and timber harvesting using LANDIS. , 2000 .
[37] R. Forman,et al. The Ecological Road‐Effect Zone of a Massachusetts (U.S.A.) Suburban Highway , 2000 .
[38] V. Pope,et al. The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model: HadAM3 , 2000 .
[39] W. G. Strand,et al. Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations , 2000 .
[40] R. O'Neill,et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.
[41] Thomas Webler,et al. “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick , 1995 .