Invited commentary: The context and challenge of von Pettenkofer's contributions to epidemiology.

Max von Pettenkofer is largely remembered for swallowing cholera vibrio, trying thereby to falsify the claim of his rival, the contagionist Robert Koch, that the bacillus he had isolated was cholera's sufficient cause. In this issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology, Alfredo Morabia reminds us that von Pettenkofer was more than this futile gesture. He was a 19th century public health leader whose multifactorial theory of cholera etiology deeply influenced the dominant anticontagionist school of disease transmission. His authority was undercut by the massive 1892 cholera epidemic in Hamburg, Germany. As it took off, the German government sent in Koch, who successfully contained the epidemic through interventions that von Pettenkofer regularly repudiated-quarantine, disinfection, and the boiling of water. The authors situate the antagonism between these two individuals within a broader scientific and political context that includes the evolution of miasma theory and debates over the role of governments confronted by epidemic disease. They also note that Koch's approach, which focused narrowly on the agent and its eradication, was missing key elements required for applying germ theory to public health. As scientists later incorporated biologic, host, and environmental factors into the germ theory paradigm, they reintroduced some of the complexity that had previously characterized the miasma model.

[1]  A. Morabia Epidemiologic interactions, complexity, and the lonesome death of Max von Pettenkofer. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  Ezra Susser,et al.  The eco- in eco-epidemiology. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[3]  D. Lilienfeld The First Epidemiology Textbook, Revisited , 2003 .

[4]  David S Barnes,et al.  Spreading germs: disease theories and medical practice in Britain, 1865–1900 , 2003, Medical History.

[5]  Susan D. Jones Spreading Germs: Disease Theories and Medical Practice in Britain, 1865-1900 (review) , 2002 .

[6]  R. Porter Death in Hamburg. Society and politics in the cholera years 1830-1910 , 1988, Medical History.

[7]  C. Lawrence Victorian social medicine. The ideas and methods of William Farr , 1981, Medical History.

[8]  G. Rosen History of Public Health. , 1959, Science.

[9]  L. W. Parr History of Public Health. , 1959, Science.

[10]  M. P. Ravenel The Principles of Epidemiology and the Process of Infection , 1931, Nature.

[11]  W. O. Kermack,et al.  A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics , 1927 .

[12]  J. Brownlee Statistical Studies in Immunity. Natural Immunity and the Capacity for acquiring Immunity in the Acute Infectious Diseases , 1905, Epidemiology and Infection.

[13]  R. Evans Death in Hamburg : society and politics in the cholera years , 2005 .

[14]  J. Botella de Maglia,et al.  [Prevention of malaria]. , 1999, Revista clinica espanola.

[15]  J. Mendelsohn From eradication to equilibrium : how epidemics became complex after World War I , 1998 .

[16]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Greater than the parts : holism in biomedicine, 1920-1950 , 1998 .

[17]  H. E. Soper The Interpretation of Periodicity in Disease Prevalence , 1929 .