Progress in the recording of human retinal and occipital potentials.

Surface electrodes have been used for many years to pick up electrical activity that originates in the human eye or occipital cortex. In the earlier work, bright flashes of light were required to elicit responses that were large enough to measure against the ambient noise of the recording system. Recently, averaging techniques and other improvements have greatly increased the sensitivity of these methods. It is therefore no longer necessary to use the relatively meaningless light flashes, and responses can be obtained to visually significant aspects of the stimulus field. Of particular interest are specific effects due to image motion, color differences, and binocular fusion and rivalry. By the use of standard contact-lens and EEG electrodes, information on the processing of the stimulus pattern is obtained at both retinal and occipital levels of the human visual system. Microelectrode experiments with animal subjects have likewise shown that single flashes of light are of minor importance as visual stimuli, and that more significant aspects of visual patterns are particularly effective in arousing the responses of visual cells at all levels. Hence this evidence can be used as a guide to the interpretation of the human results, since these are necessarily obtained from electrodes that are remote from the sites at which they are generated. In short, the traditional methods of psychophysics are still used to provide definitive data on human vision. But the neural basis for these data is most clearly provided by microelectrode studies on the visual cells of experimental animals, together with such remotely recorded human action potentials as can be obtained from the retina and cortex.

[1]  L. Riggs Electroretinography in cases of night blindness. , 1954, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  L. Riggs,et al.  The effect of stimulus area and intensity upon the human retinal response. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  L. Riggs,et al.  Human occipital and retinal potentials evoked by subjectively faded visual stimuli. , 1967, Vision research.

[4]  D H Fender,et al.  Component analysis of human averaged evoked potentials: dichoptic stimuli using different target structure. , 1968, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  W. Cobb,et al.  Cerebral Potentials evoked by Pattern Reversal and their Suppression in Visual Rivalry , 1967, Nature.

[6]  D. Fender,et al.  EEG responses to light flashes during the observation of stabilized and normal retinal images. , 1967, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  R. Cone Early Receptor Potential of the Vertebrate Retina , 1964, Nature.

[8]  W. Walter,et al.  COMPARISON OF SUBCORTICAL, CORTICAL AND SCALP ACTIVITY USING CHRONICALLY INDWELLING ELECTRODES IN MAN. , 1965, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  E. Adrian Rod and cone components in the electric response of the eye , 1946, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Utilization of the Stiles-Crawford effect in the investigation of the origin of electrical responses of the human eye , 1968 .

[11]  E. Adrian Rod and Cone Responses in the Human Eye , 1944, Nature.

[12]  A. Schick,et al.  Electrical Responses of the Human Eye to Moving Stimulus Patterns. , 1964, Science.

[13]  D. Lindsley,et al.  Attention, Vigilance, and Cortical Evoked-Potentials in Humans , 1964, Science.

[14]  N. Galloway Early receptor potential in the human eye. , 1967, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  T. Cornsweet,et al.  Electroretinal Photopic Sensitivity Curves , 1954, Nature.

[16]  S. Goldring,et al.  Intracellular potentials from "idle" cells in cerebral cortex of cat. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  E. Adrian The electric response of the human eye , 1945, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  E. Valenstein,et al.  Inhibition of visual evoked responses to patterned stimuli during voluntary eye movements. , 1967, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  G Wald,et al.  HUMAN VISION AND THE SPECTRUM. , 1945, Science.

[20]  D. A. Burkhardt,et al.  Modification of the human visual evoked potential by monochromatic backgrounds. , 1967, Vision research.

[21]  R. L. Valois Color Vision Mechanisms in the Monkey , 1960 .

[22]  H. K. Hartline THE ELECTRICAL RESPONSE TO ILLUMINATION OF THE EYE IN INTACT ANIMALS, INCLUDING THE HUMAN SUBJECT; AND IN DECEREBRATE PREPARATIONS , 1925 .

[23]  L A Riggs,et al.  Human retinal and occipital potentials evoked by changes of the wavelength of the stimulating light. , 1969, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[24]  W. Noell,et al.  Failure of the visual pathway during anoxia. , 1950, The American journal of physiology.

[25]  M. Murakami,et al.  A New Receptor Potential of the Monkey Retina with no Detectable Latency , 1964, Nature.

[26]  A comparison of electrical and psychophysical determinations of the spectral sensitivity of the human eye. , 1949 .

[27]  L. Riggs Continuous and Reproducible Records of the Electrical Activity of the Human Retina.∗ , 1941 .

[28]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  T. Tomita,et al.  Electrical activity in the vertebrate retina. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.