The Effects of Digital Noise Reduction on the Acceptance of Background Noise

Modern hearing aids commonly employ digital noise reduction (DNR) algorithms. The potential benefit of these algorithms is to provide improved speech understanding in noise or, at the least, to provide relaxed listening or increased ease of listening. In this study, 22 adults were fitted with 16-channel wide-dynamic-range compression hearing aids containing DNR processing. The DNR includes both modulation-based and Wiener-filter-type algorithms working simultaneously. Both speech intelligibility and acceptable noise level (ANL) were assessed using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) with DNR on and DNR off. The ANL was also assessed without hearing aids. The results showed a significant mean improvement for the ANL (4.2 dB) for the DNR-on condition when compared to DNR-off condition. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the magnitude of ANL improvement (relative to DNR on) and the DNR-off ANL. There was no significant mean improvement for the HINT for the DNR-on condition, and on an individual basis, the HINT score did not significantly correlate with either aided ANL (DNR on or DNR off). These findings suggest that at least within the constraints of the DNR algorithms and test conditions employed in this study, DNR can significantly improve the clinically measured ANL, which may result in improved ease of listening for speech-in-noise situations.

[1]  A. Harkrider,et al.  Acceptable noise level, phoneme recognition in noise, and measures of auditory efferent activity. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[2]  Todd A. Ricketts,et al.  Digital noise reduction: Much ado about something? , 2005 .

[3]  Ruth Bentler,et al.  Digital Noise Reduction: An Overview , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[4]  Anna K. Nabelek Acceptance of background noise may be key to successful fittings , 2005 .

[5]  Monique Boymans,et al.  Field Trials Using a Digital Hearing Aid with Active Noise Reduction and Dual-Microphone Directionality: Estudios de campo utilizando un audifono digital con reduccion activa del ruido y micrófono de direccionalidad dual , 2000, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[6]  R K Surr,et al.  Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[7]  M. Davies,et al.  Endovascular treatment of tracheoinnominate artery fistula: a case report. , 2006, Vascular and endovascular surgery.

[8]  Anna K Nabelek,et al.  The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[9]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids , 1999 .

[10]  Saeed Vaseghi,et al.  Advanced Signal Processing and Digital Noise Reduction , 1996 .

[11]  Todd A Ricketts,et al.  Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing digital noise reduction. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[12]  Anna K Nabelek,et al.  Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  Robyn M. Cox,et al.  The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[14]  Robert A Muenchen,et al.  Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[15]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Melinda C Freyaldenhoven,et al.  Acceptable noise level as a measure of directional hearing aid benefit. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[17]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid: Evaluación del sistema de reducción de ruido en un auxiliar auditivo digital comercial , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[18]  R. Bentler Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[19]  T R Letowski,et al.  Toleration of background noises: relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.