The Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS)

Background There is a need for a patient-relevant instrument to evaluate outcome after treatment in patients with a total Achilles tendon rupture. Purpose To develop and validate a new patient-reported instrument for measuring outcome after treatment for total Achilles tendon rupture. Study Design Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1. Methods Development of this instrument consisted of item generation and test construction, item reduction, validation, evaluation of structure and internal consistency, test-retest, and test for responsiveness. The final version, the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), was tested for validity, structure, and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) on 82 patients and 52 healthy persons. A correlation analysis was performed of the ATRS with the 2 validated foot/ankle/Achilles tendon scores, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the Swedish version of the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles questionnaire (VISA-A-S). Structure was evaluated with factor analysis. Test-retest reliability was evaluated on 43 patients. The ATRS responsiveness was tested on 43 patients by calculating the effect size. Results The total score for the patients ranged from 17 to 100 with a mean (median) of 77 (85) and a standard deviation (interquartile range) of 21.4 (23). A significantly (P < .0001) higher total score was found for the healthy subjects, ranging from 94 to 100 with a mean (median) of 99.8 (100) and a standard deviation (interquartile range) of 1.1 (0). The ATRS correlated significantly (P < .01) with all subscales of the FAOS (r = 0.60-0.84) and the VISA-A-S (r = 0.78). The factor analysis gave 1 factor of importance. The internal consistency was 0.96 as measured with Cronbach's alpha. The test-retest produced an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98. The tests for responsiveness showed an effect size between 0.87 and 2.21. Conclusion The ATRS is a patient-reported instrument with high reliability, validity, and sensitivity for measuring outcome after treatment in patients with a total Achilles tendon rupture. Clinical Relevance The ATRS is a self-administered instrument with high clinical utility, and we suggest the score for measuring the outcome, related to symptoms and physical activity, after treatment in patients with a total Achilles tendon rupture.

[1]  K. Dehaven,et al.  Functional Bracing for Rupture of the Achilles Tendon. Clinical Results and Analysis of Ground-Reaction Forces and Temporal Data* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  T. Edna.  Non-operative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[3]  J. Karlsson,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the VISA-A questionnaire, an index of clinical severity for patients with Achilles tendinopathy, with reliability, validity and structure evaluations , 2005, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[4]  P. Ohtonen,et al.  Rerupture and Deep Infection Following Treatment of Total Achilles Tendon Rupture , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  M. Parker,et al.  Interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  Jon Karlsson,et al.  Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for Ankle Ligament Reconstruction , 2001, Foot & ankle international.

[7]  J. Wark,et al.  The VISA score: an index of severity of symptoms in patients with jumper's knee (patellar tendinosis). Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. , 1998, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[8]  A. Kirkley,et al.  Development of disease-specific quality of life measurement tools. , 2003, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[9]  M. Tägil,et al.  Nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[10]  O. Borens,et al.  Nonoperative treatment of acute rupture of the Achilles tendon: results of a new protocol and comparison with operative treatment. , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  L. Nistor.  Surgical and non-surgical treatment of Achilles Tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  J. Leppilahti,et al.  Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Achilles Rupture Repair Using a New Scoring Method , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  B. Hanson,et al.  Musculoskeletal Outcomes Measures and Instruments , 2005 .

[14]  P. Kannus,et al.  Achilles tendon disorders: etiology and epidemiology. , 2005, Foot and ankle clinics.

[15]  T. M. Mitchell-Fox.  Achilles tendon rupture. , 1973, Lancet.

[16]  Martyn Parker,et al.  Treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  H. Tscherne,et al.  [Functional treatment concept of acute rupture of the Achilles tendon. 2 years results of a prospective randomized study]. , 1995, Der Unfallchirurg.

[18]  J. Taunton,et al.  The VISA-A questionnaire: a valid and reliable index of the clinical severity of Achilles tendinopathy , 2001, British journal of sports medicine.

[19]  R. Cetti,et al.  A New Treatment of Ruptured Achilles Tendons A Prospective Randomized Study , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  A. Möller,et al.  Increasing incidence of Achilles tendon rupture. , 1996, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[21]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health measurement scales , 2008 .

[22]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. , 2000, Spine.

[23]  J. Karlsson,et al.  Acute rupture of tendon Achillis. A prospective randomised study of comparison between surgical and non-surgical treatment. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  N. Maffulli,et al.  Quantitative Review of Operative and Nonoperative Management of Achilles Tendon Ruptures , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[25]  E. Roos,et al.  The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[26]  Jason Wong,et al.  Early Weightbearing and Ankle Mobilization after Open Repair of Acute Midsubstance Tears of the Achilles Tendon , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[27]  N. Maffulli,et al.  Acute rupture of the Achilles tendon. , 2005, Foot and ankle clinics.

[28]  R. Cetti.  A new treatment of ruptured Achilles tendons , 1994 .

[29]  A. Faraj,et al.  A subjective outcome analysis of tendo-Achilles rupture. , 2006, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[30]  J. Karlsson,et al.  A new instrument for measuring self‐efficacy in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury , 2006, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[31]  Lewis E. Kazis,et al.  Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status , 1989, Medical care.

[32]  U. Jørgensen,et al.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture , 1993 .

[33]  A. Kirkley,et al.  Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Quantitative Review , 1997, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[34]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures A Systematic Overview and Metaanalysis , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  Hajo Thermann,et al.  Achillessehnenruptur@@@Achilles tendon rupture , 2000 .

[36]  N. Maffulli,et al.  Changing incidence of Achilles tendon rupture in Scotland: a 15-year study. , 1999, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.