Evidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding.

Theories of attention and visual search explain how attention is guided toward objects with known target features. But can attention be directed away from objects with a feature known to be associated only with distractors? Most studies have found that the demand to maintain the to-be-avoided feature in visual working memory biases attention toward matching objects rather than away from them. In contrast, Arita, Carlisle, and Woodman (2012) claimed that attention can be configured to selectively avoid objects that match a cued distractor color, and they reported evidence that this type of negative cue generates search benefits. However, the colors of the search array items in Arita et al. (2012) were segregated by hemifield (e.g., blue items on the left, red on the right), which allowed for a strategy of translating the feature-cue information into a simple spatial template (e.g., avoid right, or attend left). In the present study, we replicated the negative cue benefit using the Arita et al. (2012), method (albeit within a subset of participants who reliably used the color cues to guide attention). Then, we eliminated the benefit by using search arrays that could not be grouped by hemifield. Our results suggest that feature-guided avoidance is implemented only indirectly, in this case by translating feature-cue information into a spatial template.

[1]  S. Luck,et al.  The role of visual working memory (VWM) in the control of gaze during visual search , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention? , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[3]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[4]  Howard E Egeth,et al.  The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[5]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  B. Postle Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain , 2006, Neuroscience.

[7]  Jason T. Arita,et al.  Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Competition in visual working memory for control of search , 2003 .

[9]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Valerie M. Beck,et al.  Simultaneous Control of Attention by Multiple Working Memory Representations , 2012, Psychological science.

[12]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Visual Working Memory Modulates Rapid Eye Movements to Simple Onset Targets , 2013, Psychological science.

[13]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[15]  Stephen M. Emrich Competition in Visual Working Memory , 2012 .

[16]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2022 .

[17]  G. Woodman,et al.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Setting up the target template in visual search. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[20]  Dietmar Heinke,et al.  Working memory can guide pop-out search , 2006, Vision Research.

[21]  Christian N L Olivers,et al.  What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[23]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[24]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Naomi M. Kenner,et al.  How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search , 2004, Vision Research.