Indoor Environmental Quality ( IEQ ) Title Are ' Class A ' temperature requirements realistic or desirable ?

It requires more energy to maintain a narrow indoor temperature range than a broader range, in which the building may be allowed to float with reduced conditioning for longer periods of time. A narrow range should presumably be preferable to the building occupants to justify its increased energy cost. At what widths are temperature ranges detected, preferred, or judged unacceptable? Three databases of occupant satisfaction in buildings are used to examine the acceptability of three classes of temperature range currently employed in the ISO and European standards, and proposed for the ASHRAE standard. These are alternatively identified as class A, B, and C, or category I, II, and III, but their specifications are identical. The A class (I category) is found to confer no relative satisfaction benefit to individuals or to realistic building occupancies. In addition, the differences in B and C class satisfaction are small.

[1]  Fariborz Haghighat,et al.  Field study of occupant comfort and office thermal environments in a cold climate , 1997 .

[2]  Gail Brager,et al.  Operable windows, personal control and occupant comfort. , 2004 .

[3]  J. F. Nicol,et al.  Developing an adaptive control algorithm for Europe , 2002 .

[4]  Gail Brager,et al.  Air movement preferences observed in office buildings , 2007, International journal of biometeorology.

[5]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  New standards for comfort and energy use in buildings , 2009 .

[6]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Comfort, perceived air quality, and work performance in a low-power task–ambient conditioning system , 2008 .

[7]  B W Olesen,et al.  International standards for the indoor environment. , 2004, Indoor air.

[8]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Field experiments on occupant comfort and office thermal environments in a hot-humid climate , 1994 .

[9]  C. Huizenga,et al.  A thermal comfort prediction tool , 1996 .

[10]  Standard Ashrae.  Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[11]  P. Fanger.  Moderate Thermal Environments Determination of the PMV and PPD Indices and Specification of the Conditions for Thermal Comfort , 1984 .

[12]  J. F. Nicol,et al.  The validity of ISO-PMV for predicting comfort votes in every-day thermal environments , 2002 .

[13]  J. Toftum,et al.  Air movement--good or bad? , 2004, Indoor air.

[14]  Bjarne W. Olesen,et al.  Criteria for the indoor environment for energy performance of buildings , 2006 .

[15]  K. Cena,et al.  Field study of occupant comfort and office thermal environments in a hot, arid climate , 1999 .