Hierarchical habitat selection by North American porcupines in southern boreal forest

In habitat-selection studies, a multi-scale approach is considered necessary to ensure that all elements of selection are depicted and that management decisions accurately reflect the needs of the species under study. We examined hierarchy in summer habitat selection in North American porcupines (Erethizon dorsatum (L., 1758)) in Eastern Canada at the scales of landscape, home range, and single tree. We used radiotelemetry to locate and observe animals visually to record their behaviour and exact location in the habitat. Den use in summer was unexpectedly high for some of our animals, which forced us to use a restricted number of locations per individual for comparison among scales. Although porcupines are generalists at the landscape level, selection patterns appear at the home-range and tree levels. Human-used land and conifer forests were least selected features of home ranges, while deciduous forests dominated by trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) and mixed forests were most selected. At the...

[1]  F. Messier,et al.  Hierarchical habitat selection by barren-ground grizzly bears in the central Canadian Arctic , 2002, Oecologia.

[2]  Douglas H. Johnson.  THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[3]  Nicholas J. Aebischer,et al.  Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data , 1993 .

[4]  D. Berteaux,et al.  IMMOBILIZATION OF NORTH AMERICAN PORCUPINES (ERETHIZON DORSATUM) USING KETAMINE AND XYLAZINE , 2003, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[5]  T. Fuller,et al.  Habitat Use by Porcupines (Erethizon dorsatum) in Central Massachusetts: Effects of Topography and Forest Composition , 1998 .

[6]  F. Messier,et al.  Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors , 2000 .

[7]  L. Boitani,et al.  Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences , 2001 .

[8]  T. Fuller,et al.  Denning patterns of Porcupines, Erethizon dorsatum , 1996, The Canadian field-naturalist.

[9]  Jim Fowler,et al.  Practical Statistics for Field Biology , 1991 .

[10]  W. T. Jackson,et al.  Impact of feeding damage by the porcupine on western hemlock – Sitka spruce forests of north-coastal British Columbia , 1986 .

[11]  U. Roze.  Winter foraging by individual porcupines , 1984 .

[12]  Boris Schröder,et al.  Analysis of pattern–process interactions based on landscape models—Overview, general concepts, and methodological issues , 2006 .

[13]  Philip D. McLoughlin,et al.  Overcoming radiotelemetry bias in habitat- selection studies , 1999 .

[14]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  Habitat selection by roe deer and sheep: does habitat ranking reflect resource availability? , 1999 .

[15]  John M. Fryxell,et al.  Foraging ecology of bison at the landscape and plant community levels: the applicability of energy maximization principles , 2002, Oecologia.

[16]  L. Harder.  Winter use of montane forests by porcupines in southwestern Alberta: preferences, density effects, and temporal changes , 1980 .

[17]  C. O. Mohr,et al.  Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals , 1947 .

[18]  Difficulties in detecting habitat selection by animals in generally suitable areas , 2000, Wildlife Biology.

[19]  David Saltz,et al.  Forging at Different Spatial Scales: Dorcas Gazelles Foraging for Lilies in the Negev Desert , 1994 .

[20]  R. Powell,et al.  The North American Porcupine , 1991 .

[21]  Angela Lee,et al.  Perspectives on … Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc , 1997 .

[22]  B. Leopold,et al.  Seasonal Habitat Selection by Raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Intensively Managed Pine Forests of Central Mississippi , 2002 .

[23]  Derek W. Bailey,et al.  Large Herbivore Foraging and Ecological HierarchiesLandscape ecology can enhance traditional foraging theory , 1987 .

[24]  J. Rolstad,et al.  Habitat selection as a hierarchical spatial process: the green woodpecker at the northern edge of its distribution range , 2000, Oecologia.

[25]  M. Kennedy,et al.  USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO DETERMINE HOME RANGE OF THE SOUTHERN FLYING SQUIRREL (GLAUCOMYS VOLANS) , 1997 .

[26]  J. Ouellet,et al.  Suitability of the forest landscape for coyotes in northeastern North America and its implications for coexistence with other carnivores , 2001 .

[27]  D. Berteaux,et al.  SPRING-TO-FALL MASS GAIN IN A NORTHERN POPULATION OF NORTH AMERICAN PORCUPINES , 2005 .

[28]  L. R. Grosenbaugh.  Plotless Timber Estimates—New, Fast, Easy , 1952 .

[29]  W. Foley,et al.  Intraspecific variation in Eucalyptus secondary metabolites determines food intake by folivorous marsupials , 1998, Oecologia.

[30]  R. Courtois,et al.  Effects of sampling effort based on GPS telemetry on home-range size estimations , 2002 .

[31]  R. Schwab,et al.  Early Summer Activities of Porcupines as Determined by Radio-Positioning Techniques , 1962 .

[32]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Scale and heterogeneity in habitat selection by elk in Yellowstone National Park , 2003 .

[33]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  Animal Movement , 1955, Nature.

[34]  J. Wiens.  Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[35]  J. A. Schaefer,et al.  Habitat selection as a hierarchy: the spatial scales of winter foraging by muskoxen , 1995 .

[36]  P. McLoughlin,et al.  HIERARCHICAL HABITAT SELECTION BY TUNDRA WOLVES , 2004 .

[37]  Bernard Cazelles,et al.  Porcupine Feeding Scars and Climatic Data Show Ecosystem Effects of the Solar Cycle , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[38]  Louis Bélanger,et al.  Validité de la carte forestière pour décrire les habitats fauniques à l'échelle locale : une étude de cas en Abitibi-Témiscamingue , 1999 .

[39]  Y. Linhart,et al.  Porcupine feeding patterns: selectivity by a generalist herbivore? , 1997 .

[40]  U. Roze.  Denning and winter range of the porcupine , 1987 .

[41]  K. Mardia.  Assessment of multinormality and the robustness of Hotelling's T^2 test , 1975 .