Development of destination choice models for pedestrian travel

Most research on walking behavior has focused on mode choice or walk trip frequency. In contrast, this study is one of the first to analyze the destination choice behaviors of pedestrians. Using about 4,500 walk trips from a 2011 household travel survey in the Portland, Oregon, region, we estimated multinomial logit pedestrian destination choice models for six trip purposes. Independent variables included terms for impedance (walk trip distance), size (employment by type, households), supportive pedestrian environments (parks, a pedestrian index of the environment variable called PIE), barriers to walking (terrain, industrial-type employment), and traveler characteristics. Unique to this study was the use of small-scale destination zone alternatives. Distance was a significant deterrent to pedestrian destination choice, and people in carless or childless households were less sensitive to distance for some purposes. Employment (especially retail) was a strong attractor: doubling the number of jobs nearly doubled the odds of choosing a destination for home-based shopping walk trips. More attractive pedestrian environments were also positively associated with pedestrian destination choice after controlling for other factors. These results shed light on determinants of pedestrian destination choice behavior, and sensitivities in the models highlight potential policy-levers to increase walking activity. In addition, the destination choice models can be used in regional travel demand models or as pedestrian planning tools to evaluate land use and transportation policy and investment scenarios.

[1]  Washington State,et al.  Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages , 2012 .

[2]  A. Anas.  Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models , 1983 .

[3]  F. Pagliara,et al.  Choice set generation in spatial contexts: a review , 2009 .

[4]  Kelly J. Clifton,et al.  Development of a Pedestrian Demand Estimation Tool , 2015 .

[5]  H. Timmermans,et al.  A Model of Pedestrian Route Choice and Demand for Retail Facilities within Inner-City Shopping Areas , 2010 .

[6]  Daniel A. Rodriguez,et al.  The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment , 2004 .

[7]  B. Saelens,et al.  Built environment correlates of walking: a review. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Destination Choice Modeling for Home-Based Recreational Trips: Analysis and Implications for Land Use, Transportation, and Air Quality Planning , 2001 .

[9]  R. Schneider.  Theory of routine mode choice decisions: An operational framework to increase sustainable transportation , 2013 .

[10]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Disaggregate Attraction-End Choice Modeling: Formulation and Empirical Analysis , 1998 .

[11]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Models for Anticipating Non-motorized Travel Choices, and Role of the Built Environment , 2014 .

[12]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[13]  André de Palma,et al.  Discrete choice models with capacity constraints: an empirical analysis of the housing market of the greater Paris region , 2007 .

[14]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[15]  Ronald W Eash,et al.  Destination and Mode Choice Models for Nonmotorized Travel , 1999 .

[16]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[17]  Robert J. Schneider,et al.  Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation Along Existing Roads—ActiveTrans Priority Tool Guidebook , 2015 .

[18]  Eric I. Pas,et al.  STATE OF THE ART AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES IN TRAVEL DEMAND: ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE , 1985 .

[19]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  STRATEGIC SAMPLING FOR LARGE CHOICE SETS IN ESTIMATION AND APPLICATION , 2012 .

[20]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  The objective versus the perceived environment: what matters for bicycling? , 2014 .

[21]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  A context-sensitive model of spatial choice behaviour , 1988 .

[22]  David E. Boyce,et al.  Enhanced Destination Choice Models Incorporating Agglomeration Related to Trip Chaining While Controlling for Spatial Competition , 2009 .

[23]  David R. Ragland,et al.  Pilot Model for Estimating Pedestrian Intersection Crossing Volumes , 2009 .

[24]  Patrick A. Singleton,et al.  A Theory of Travel Decision-Making with Applications for Modeling Active Travel Demand , 2013 .

[25]  Patrick A. Singleton,et al.  Safety and Security in Discretionary Travel Decision Making , 2014 .

[26]  K. Clifton,et al.  Representing pedestrian activity in travel demand models: Framework and application , 2016 .

[27]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Effect of Sampling of Alternatives in Discrete Choice Models , 2004 .

[28]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models , 2003 .