Gaussian process regression for tool wear prediction

Abstract To realize and accelerate the pace of intelligent manufacturing, this paper presents a novel tool wear assessment technique based on the integrated radial basis function based kernel principal component analysis (KPCA_IRBF) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) for real-timely and accurately monitoring the in-process tool wear parameters (flank wear width). The KPCA_IRBF is a kind of new nonlinear dimension-increment technique and firstly proposed for feature fusion. The tool wear predictive value and the corresponding confidence interval are both provided by utilizing the GPR model. Besides, GPR performs better than artificial neural networks (ANN) and support vector machines (SVM) in prediction accuracy since the Gaussian noises can be modeled quantitatively in the GPR model. However, the existence of noises will affect the stability of the confidence interval seriously. In this work, the proposed KPCA_IRBF technique helps to remove the noises and weaken its negative effects so as to make the confidence interval compressed greatly and more smoothed, which is conducive for monitoring the tool wear accurately. Moreover, the selection of kernel parameter in KPCA_IRBF can be easily carried out in a much larger selectable region in comparison with the conventional KPCA_RBF technique, which helps to improve the efficiency of model construction. Ten sets of cutting tests are conducted to validate the effectiveness of the presented tool wear assessment technique. The experimental results show that the in-process flank wear width of tool inserts can be monitored accurately by utilizing the presented tool wear assessment technique which is robust under a variety of cutting conditions. This study lays the foundation for tool wear monitoring in real industrial settings.

[1]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Nonlinear Component Analysis as a Kernel Eigenvalue Problem , 1998, Neural Computation.

[2]  Akira Tanaka,et al.  Integrated kernels and their properties , 2007, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Amiya R Mohanty,et al.  Estimation of tool wear during CNC milling using neural network-based sensor fusion , 2007 .

[4]  Tao Chen,et al.  Gaussian process regression with multiple response variables , 2015 .

[5]  Surjya K. Pal,et al.  On-machine tool prediction of flank wear from machined surface images using texture analyses and support vector regression , 2016 .

[6]  Dongfeng Shi,et al.  Tool wear predictive model based on least squares support vector machines , 2007 .

[7]  Haikun Wei,et al.  A Gaussian process regression based hybrid approach for short-term wind speed prediction , 2016 .

[8]  Lixiang Duan,et al.  Multisensory fusion based virtual tool wear sensing for ubiquitous manufacturing , 2017 .

[9]  Durul Ulutan,et al.  A wavelet-based data-driven modelling for tool wear assessment of difficult to machine materials , 2016 .

[10]  Yali Wang,et al.  KNN-based Kalman filter: An efficient and non-stationary method for Gaussian process regression , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[11]  C. Yoo,et al.  Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis , 2004 .

[12]  Yongping Pan,et al.  Fault prognosis of filamentous sludge bulking using an enhanced multi-output gaussian processes regression , 2017 .

[13]  D. R. Salgado,et al.  An approach based on current and sound signals for in-process tool wear monitoring , 2007 .

[14]  Connor Jennings,et al.  A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Algorithms for Smart Manufacturing: Tool Wear Prediction Using Random Forests , 2017 .

[15]  Yongbo Peng,et al.  Dimension reduction of Karhunen-Loeve expansion for simulation of stochastic processes , 2017 .

[16]  Dongdong Kong,et al.  Tool wear monitoring based on kernel principal component analysis and v-support vector regression , 2016, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[17]  Chen Peng,et al.  Energy consumption monitoring for the order fulfilment in a ubiquitous manufacturing environment , 2017 .

[18]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Chen Zhang,et al.  Modelling and prediction of tool wear using LS-SVM in milling operation , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[20]  Jose Vicente Abellan-Nebot,et al.  A review of machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence process models , 2010 .

[21]  P. S. Heyns,et al.  A comparative evaluation of neural networks and hidden Markov models for monitoring turning tool wear , 2005, Neural Computing & Applications.

[22]  Mark Ebden Gaussian Processes for Regression: A Quick Introduction , 2008 .

[23]  Yanchun Liang,et al.  IMPROVED ELMAN NETWORKS AND APPLICATIONS FOR CONTROLLING ULTRASONIC MOTORS , 2004, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[24]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  New Support Vector Algorithms , 2000, Neural Computation.

[25]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[26]  Ryutaro Tanaka,et al.  Effect of different features to drill-wear prediction with back propagation neural network , 2014 .

[27]  Krzysztof Jemielniak,et al.  Advanced monitoring of machining operations , 2010 .

[28]  Geok Soon Hong,et al.  Wavelet analysis of sensor signals for tool condition monitoring: A review and some new results , 2009 .

[29]  Bülent Kaya,et al.  Force-torque based on-line tool wear estimation system for CNC milling of Inconel 718 using neural networks , 2011, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[30]  P. S. Heyns,et al.  An integrated Gaussian process regression for prediction of remaining useful life of slow speed bearings based on acoustic emission , 2017 .

[31]  Eric O. Postma,et al.  Dimensionality Reduction: A Comparative Review , 2008 .

[32]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (GPML) Toolbox , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[33]  Colin Bradley,et al.  A review of machine vision sensors for tool condition monitoring , 1997 .