The Usefulness of Transport Models in Swedish Planning Practice

Abstract This paper presents some experience from using transport models in Swedish planning practice. First we outline three recent examples of planning settings in which transport models have been put to extensive use. For the Swedish ‘national’ transport plan for the period 2010–2021, which was recently finished, the national transport model SAMPERS was used to compute costs and benefits for many investment projects. The second example concerns the ‘regional’ plan for Stockholm, where a similar but less detailed model, LuTRANS, was used to investigate different transport and land use scenarios. The third example discusses a recent study on the feasibility of introducing congestion charges in Gothenburg, where both a fixed demand approach and SAMPERS were used. Furthermore, the paper tries to help identify what model development can do to help improve the production of decision support through modelling. We argue that effectiveness and efficiency are key. The first is characterized by making sure that the right things are done and that they are done right. Efficiency, which is less often discussed in the literature, is framed in terms of doing things on time and doing them only once. The managing organization around a national model system can play an important role in helping users avoid redundant work. It is also a good idea to resist the temptation to use up all improvements in computing power for additional model features. There are many worthwhile analyses that are never done because of time constraints.

[1]  Stan C. M. Geertman,et al.  Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[2]  M. te Brömmelstroet,et al.  Making Planning Support Systems Matter. Improving the use of Planning Support Systems for Integrated land use and transport strategy-making , 2010 .

[3]  J Williams Metropolitan travel forecasting: current practice and future direction , 2008 .

[4]  Richard E. Klosterman,et al.  An introduction to the literature on large-scale urban models , 1994 .

[5]  Dowell Myers,et al.  Constructing the Future in Planning: A Survey of Theories and Tools , 2000 .

[6]  Lars Lundqvist,et al.  National Transport Models , 2002 .

[7]  Douglass B. Lee Retrospective on Large-Scale Urban Models , 1994 .

[8]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL , 1992 .

[9]  Michael Batty,et al.  NCGIA National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Locational Models , Geographic Information , and Planning Support Systems , 2022 .

[10]  Britton Harris,et al.  The Real Issues Concerning Lee's “Requiem” , 1994 .

[11]  M. Batty A CHRONICLE OF SCIENTIFIC PLANNING - THE ANGLO-AMERICAN MODELING EXPERIENCE , 1994 .

[12]  Douglass B. Lee,et al.  Requiem for large-scale models , 1973, SIML.

[13]  Lars Lundqvist,et al.  National Transport Models: Introduction and Comparative Analysis , 2002 .

[14]  J. Elíasson,et al.  The Stockholm congestion – charging trial 2006: Overview of effects ☆ , 2009 .

[15]  S. Guhathakurta Urban Modeling as Storytelling: Using Simulation Models as a Narrative , 2002 .

[16]  Peter Furnish,et al.  Making the Most of Models: Using Models To Develop More Effective Transport Policies And Strategies , 2009 .

[17]  M. Wegener Operational Urban Models State of the Art , 1994 .

[18]  Henrik Gudmundsson,et al.  Analysing Models as a Knowledge Technology in Transport Planning , 2011 .

[19]  D. Crawford Introduction , 2008, CACM.

[20]  Paul Schot,et al.  Bottlenecks Blocking Widespread Usage of Planning Support Systems , 2005 .

[21]  H. Couclelis “Where has the Future Gone?” Rethinking the Role of Integrated Land-Use Models in Spatial Planning , 2005 .