A method of analysing recontextualisation in the communication of science

Although communication is a creative process, this does not mean that alldiscourse is entirely novel. On the contrary, speakers and writers often drawupon material encountered within previous discourse-situations, and reuse itin their current discourse-environment. This process, whereby content thathas been given expression in one context is subsequently lifted into a differentcontext, is known as recontextualisation. Furthermore, such recontextualisationis frequently accompanied by the recasting or reexpression of the text itself, aprocess which may be termed resemiotisation. The present chapter proposes abroadly-based, three-tier method for the systematic analysis of recontextualisationand of the accompanying resemiotisation, and applies it to the practicalstudy of communication in science education.

[1]  Susanna Horning Priest Reinterpreting the audiences for media messages about science , 2009 .

[2]  Marie-Claude Roland,et al.  Quality and integrity in scientific writing: prerequisites for quality in science communication , 2009 .

[3]  Jan Rijkhoff,et al.  Layers, levels and contexts in Functional Discourse Grammar , 2008 .

[4]  I. Wilmut,et al.  "Viable Offspring Derived from Fetal and Adult Mammalian Cells" (1997), by Ian Wilmut et al. , 2014 .

[5]  Jean Parkinson,et al.  The Use of Popular Science Articles in Teaching Scientific Literacy. , 2004 .

[6]  Elisabeth Gülich,et al.  Discourse Production in Oral Communication. A Study Based on French , 1995 .

[7]  Ron Scollon,et al.  The discourses of food in the world system: Toward a nexus analysis of a world problem , 2005 .

[8]  Julie E. Wollman-Bonilla Teaching Science Writing to First Graders: Genre Learning and Recontextualization , 2016 .

[9]  G. Myers Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries , 2003 .

[10]  Per Linell,et al.  Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in Professional discourse , 1998 .

[11]  Jeannett Martin Genre, Ideology and Intertextuality: A Systemic Functional Perspective , 2007 .

[12]  John H. Connolly Context in Functional Discourse Grammar , 2007 .

[13]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Recontextualization of Science from Lab to School: Implications for Science Literacy , 2009 .

[14]  Greg Myers,et al.  The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles , 1989 .

[15]  R. Stamper The semiotic framework for informations systems research , 1991 .

[16]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Some grammatical problems in scientific English , 1989 .

[17]  Gene Ray Conditioning adorno: ‘After Auschwitz’ Now , 2004 .

[18]  Jan Rijkhoff,et al.  Interpersonal meaning in the noun phrase , 2008 .

[19]  Christopher S. Butler Syntactic Analysis of German Chemical Texts: On Constructing a Short Course in German for Chemists. , 1975 .

[20]  Stephen Hilgartner,et al.  The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses , 1990 .

[21]  Aaron V. Cicourel,et al.  The Interpenetration of Communicative Contexts: Examples from Medical Encounters , 1987 .