Decision Aiding Nonessential objectives within network approaches for MCDM

In Gal and Hanne [Eur. J. Oper. Res. 119 (1999) 373] the problem of using several methods to solve a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem with linear objective functions after dropping nonessential objectives is analyzed. It turned out that the solution does not need be the same when using various methods for solving the system containing the nonessential objectives or not. In this paper we consider the application of network approaches for multicriteria decision making such as neural networks and an approach for combining MCDM methods (called MCDM networks). We discuss questions of comparing the results obtained with several methods as applied to the problem with or without nonessential objectives. Especially, we argue for considering redundancies such as nonessential objectives as a native feature in complex information processing. In contrast to previous results on nonessential objectives, the current paper focuses on discrete MCDM problems which are also denoted as multiple attribute decision making (MADM).

[1]  P. Yu.  Cone convexity, cone extreme points, and nondominated solutions in decision problems with multiobjectives , 1974 .

[2]  Behnam Malakooti,et al.  Clustering and selection of multiple criteria alternatives using unsupervised and supervised neural networks , 2000, J. Intell. Manuf..

[3]  K. B. Sorenson,et al.  Guidance Tools for Use in Nuclear Material Management Decisions Making , 2002 .

[4]  Heiner Leberling.  Zur Theorie der linearen Vektormaximumprobleme , 1977 .

[5]  Denis Bouyssou,et al.  Building Criteria: A Prerequisite for MCDA , 1990 .

[6]  Jacek M. Zurada,et al.  Perturbation method for deleting redundant inputs of perceptron networks , 1997, Neurocomputing.

[7]  C. Carlsson,et al.  Interdependence in fuzzy multiple objective programming , 1994 .

[8]  Tomas Gal,et al.  Redundant objective functions in linear vector maximum problems and their determination , 1977 .

[9]  Thomas Hanne.  Intelligent strategies for meta multiple criteria decision making , 2001 .

[10]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  Thomas Hanne,et al.  Consequences of dropping nonessential objectives for the application of MCDM methods , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Agnieszka B. Malinowska.  Changes of the set of efficient solutions by extending the number of objectives and its evaluation , 2002 .

[13]  Jun Wang,et al.  A feedforward neural network for multiple criteria decision making , 1992, Comput. Oper. Res..

[14]  P. Vincke,et al.  Relational Systems of Preference with One or More Pseudo-Criteria: Some New Concepts and Results , 1984 .

[15]  Minghe Sun,et al.  Solving Multiple Objective Programming Problems Using Feed-Forward Artificial Neural Networks: The Interactive FFANN Procedure , 1996 .

[16]  J. G. Evans,et al.  Post Optimal Analyses, Parametric Programming and Related Topics , 1981 .

[17]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making: The case for interdependence , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[18]  Luís Torgo,et al.  Controlled Redundancy in Incremental Rule Learning , 1993, ECML.

[19]  Tomas Gal.  A Note on Size Reduction of the Objective Functions Matrix in Vector Maximum Problems , 1980 .

[20]  Thomas Hanne.  An Application of Different MCDM Methods to Bank Balance Sheet Analysis , 1995 .

[21]  B. Malakooti,et al.  Feedforward artificial neural networks for solving discrete multiple criteria decision making problems , 1994 .

[22]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.