Thin-film solar cells normally have the shortest energy payback time due to their simpler mass-production process compared to polycrystalline-Si photovoltaic (PV) modules, despite the fact that crystalline-Si-based technology typically has a longer total lifetime and a higher initial power conversion efficiency. For both types of modules, significant aging occurs during the first two years of usage with slower long-term aging over the module lifetime. The PV lifetime and the return-on-investment for local PV system installations rely on long-term device performance. Understanding the efficiency degradation behavior under a given set of environmental conditions is, therefore, a primary goal for experimental research and economic analysis. In the present work, in-situ measurements of key electrical characteristics (J, V, Pmax, etc.) in polycrystalline-Si and CdTe thin-film PV modules have been analyzed. The modules were subjected to identical environmental conditions, representative of southern Arizona, in a full-scale, industrial-standard, environmental degradation chamber, equipped with a single-sun irradiance source, temperature, and humidity controls, and operating an accelerated lifecycle test (ALT) sequence. Initial results highlight differences in module performance with environmental conditions, including temperature de-rating effects, for the two technologies. Notably, the thin-film CdTe PV module was shown to be approximately 15% less sensitive to ambient temperature variation. After exposure to a seven-month equivalent compressed night-day weather cycling regimen the efficiency degradation rates of both PV technology types were obtained and will be discussed.
[1]
G. R. Mon,et al.
Test techniques for voltage/humidity-induced degradation of thin-film photovoltaic modules
,
1990
.
[2]
Adria Brooks,et al.
Performance reviews from the Tucson Electric Power solar test yard
,
2011,
2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.
[3]
E. Cuddihy.
The aging correlation (RH + t): relative humidity (%) + temperature (°C)
,
1987
.
[4]
Rajesh Kumar,et al.
Comparison of different technologies for solar PV (Photovoltaic) outdoor performance using indoor accelerated aging tests for long term reliability
,
2016
.
[5]
Defne Apul,et al.
Energy payback time (EPBT) and energy return on energy invested (EROI) of solar photovoltaic systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis
,
2015
.
[6]
Lydia Helena Wong,et al.
Towards high efficiency thin film solar cells
,
2017
.
[7]
George Makrides,et al.
Review of photovoltaic degradation rate methodologies
,
2014
.
[8]
Jae-Seong Jeong,et al.
Field failure mechanism study of solder interconnection for crystalline silicon photovoltaic module
,
2012,
Microelectron. Reliab..
[9]
T. D. Lee,et al.
A review of thin film solar cell technologies and challenges
,
2017
.
[10]
J. Schermer,et al.
Temperature-Induced Degradation of Thin-Film III–V Solar Cells for Space Applications
,
2017,
IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.