Improved seismic well tie by integrating variable-size window resampling with well-tie net

Abstract Accurate seismic well tie is essential for seismic inversion and reservoir characterization. The procedure of seismic well tie involves shifting, stretching and squeezing the synthetic seismogram computed from well logs to match the seismic traces at or near the borehole location. Numerous methods have been proposed for nonlinear alignment between synthetic and real seismograms. However, most well-tie methods are prone to over-stretching and the alignment result is sensitive to the chosen window size. To solve those problems, we propose a variable-size window resampling (VWR) algorithm and integrate with convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic seismic well tie. Using VWR algorithm to reconstruct the waveforms in synthetic seismogram can simulate the variety of subsurface velocity. CNN can learn the characteristic of different waveforms and recognize the most correlated waveforms between synthetic and real seismograms for sequence alignment. We first use VWR algorithm to reconstruct a large number of synthetic seismograms for train set generation. We then build an CNN model that named well-tie net for training to learn the feature of different resampled synthetic seismograms. Finally, we use the well trained CNN model to segment the real seismogram and align with the synthetic seismogram for seismic well tie. We apply our method into the synthetic test and real seismic data with well logs and obtain high correlated seismic-well tie. We also compare with the conventional method dynamic time warping (DTW) to illustrate the effectiveness and robustness of our proposed method. Our proposed method can avoid the problem of over-stretching by using the variable-size window resampling algorithm and automatically tying the well to seismic trace using well-tie net. In addition, the train set for our method is generated automatically.

[1]  Sergey Fomel,et al.  Waveform embedding: Automatic horizon picking with unsupervised deep learning , 2020 .

[2]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[3]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[4]  Rob Simm,et al.  Tutorial: good practice in well ties , 2003 .

[5]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[6]  Sergey Fomel,et al.  Convolutional neural networks for fault interpretation in seismic images , 2018, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018.

[7]  Andrew T. Walden,et al.  On errors of fit and accuracy in matching synthetic seismograms and seismic traces , 1984 .

[8]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[9]  Haibin Di,et al.  Patch-level MLP classification for improved fault detection , 2018, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018.

[10]  Xinming Wu,et al.  Simultaneous multiple well-seismic ties using flattened synthetic and real seismograms , 2016 .

[11]  Frank B. Coker,et al.  THE SYNTHESIS OF SEISMOGRAMS FROM WELL LOG DATA , 1955 .

[12]  Hao Wu,et al.  Semiautomated seismic horizon interpretation using the encoder-decoder convolutional neural network , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[13]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[14]  Sergey Fomel,et al.  Automatic salt-body classification using deep-convolutional neural network , 2018, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018.

[15]  Mirko van der Baan,et al.  Automatic approaches for seismic to well tying , 2014 .

[16]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  S. Chiba,et al.  Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition , 1978 .

[18]  Dave Hale,et al.  Dynamic warping of seismic images , 2013 .

[19]  Xishuang Dong,et al.  A scalable deep learning platform for identifying geologic features from seismic attributes , 2017 .

[20]  Jinghuai Gao,et al.  Common-azimuth seismic data fault analysis using residual UNet , 2020 .

[21]  Sergey Fomel,et al.  Automatic channel detection using deep learning , 2018, Interpretation.

[22]  Mirko van der Baan,et al.  A semiautomatic method to tie well logs to seismic data , 2014 .

[23]  Hao Wu,et al.  Semiautomatic first-arrival picking of microseismic events by using the pixel-wise convolutional image segmentation method , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[24]  Automatically tying well logs to seismic data , 2012 .

[25]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[26]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[27]  Tao Zhao,et al.  A fault-detection workflow using deep learning and image processing , 2018, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018.

[28]  R. White,et al.  How accurate can a well tie be , 1998 .

[29]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation , 2013, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[30]  R. Peterson,et al.  Synthesis of Seismograms from Well Log Data , 1955 .

[31]  R. White,et al.  Partial coherence matching of synthetic seismograms with seismic traces , 1980 .

[32]  Dave Hale,et al.  Automatic simultaneous multiple well ties , 2015 .

[33]  S. Fomel,et al.  Building realistic structure models to train convolutional neural networks for seismic structural interpretation , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[34]  Sergey Fomel,et al.  FaultSeg3D: Using synthetic data sets to train an end-to-end convolutional neural network for 3D seismic fault segmentation , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.