Forecasting petroleum futures markets volatility: The role of regimes and market conditions

In this paper we employ regime volatility models to describe time dependency in petroleum markets. Using a sample of NYMEX and ICE futures contracts, we establish the existence of a regime process and link this process to market fundamentals. This formulation results in two distinct states: a highly persistent conditional volatility process, characterised by long memory and low sensitivity to market shocks, and a relatively short-lived nonstationary process with less memory but higher sensitivity to shocks. Moreover, to investigate the relationship between disequilibrium and volatility of oil futures across high and low volatility regimes we use augmented regime GARCH models to address in a realistic way the potential diverse response of volatility to forward curve shocks. The performance of these models is compared to benchmarks, using both statistical tests and risk management loss functions. To test the robustness of the forecasting strategies, we also perform a reality check employing the stationary bootstrap approach. The findings of this paper have important implications for decision making concerning trading and risk management, as well as energy market operations, such as refining and budget planning, by providing valuable information on the oil price volatility dynamics and the ability to predict risk.

[1]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Estimating ‘Value at Risk’ of crude oil price and its spillover effect using the GED-GARCH approach , 2008 .

[2]  R. Engle.  Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation , 1982 .

[3]  James D. Hamilton.  What is an Oil Shock? , 2000 .

[4]  S. Johansen.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COINTEGRATION VECTORS , 1988 .

[5]  Joseph P. Romano,et al.  The stationary bootstrap , 1994 .

[6]  Wai Mun Fong,et al.  A Markov switching model of the conditional volatility of crude oil futures prices , 2002 .

[7]  F. Diebold,et al.  Comparing Predictive Accuracy , 1994, Business Cycles.

[8]  Petros Dellaportas,et al.  Modelling nonlinearities and heavy tails via threshold normal mixture GARCH models , 2008, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[9]  Yu Wei,et al.  Forecasting crude oil market volatility: Further evidence using GARCH-class models , 2010 .

[10]  Marc S. Paolella,et al.  A New Approach to Markov-Switching GARCH Models , 2004 .

[11]  Darrell Duffie,et al.  Volatility in energy prices , 1999 .

[12]  H. White,et al.  Data‐Snooping, Technical Trading Rule Performance, and the Bootstrap , 1999 .

[13]  Seong-Min Yoon,et al.  Forecasting volatility of crude oil markets , 2009 .

[14]  Yong Bao,et al.  Evaluating Predictive Performance of Value-at-Risk Models in Emerging Markets: A Reality Check , 2006 .

[15]  E. Fama,et al.  Commodity futures prices: some evidence on forecast power , 1987 .

[16]  Shiu‐Sheng Chen,et al.  Oil prices and real exchange rates , 2007 .

[17]  H. White,et al.  A Reality Check for Data Snooping , 2000 .

[18]  Amir H. Alizadeh,et al.  A Markov regime switching approach for hedging energy commodities , 2008 .

[19]  G. Box,et al.  On a measure of lack of fit in time series models , 1978 .

[20]  Jun Cai.  A Markov Model of Switching-Regime ARCH , 1994 .

[21]  Jui-Cheng Hung,et al.  Estimation of value-at-risk for energy commodities via fat-tailed GARCH models , 2008 .

[22]  Hélyette Geman,et al.  Forward curves, scarcity and price volatility in oil and natural gas markets , 2009 .

[23]  Chin Wen Cheong,et al.  Modeling and forecasting crude oil markets using ARCH-type models , 2009 .

[24]  C. Inclan,et al.  Detecting volatility changes across the oil sector , 1996 .

[25]  Anil K. Bera,et al.  Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals , 1980 .

[26]  Jose A. Lopez,et al.  Methods for Evaluating Value-at-Risk Estimates , 1998 .

[27]  Franc J. G. M. Klaassen,et al.  Improving GARCH volatility forecasts with regime-switching GARCH , 2002 .

[28]  Monica Billio,et al.  Value-at-Risk: a multivariate switching regime approach , 2000 .

[29]  C. Engel.  Can the Markov Switching Model Forecast Exchange Rates? , 1992 .

[30]  A. Trabelsi,et al.  Extreme Value Theory and Value at Risk : Application to Oil Market , 2009 .

[31]  T. Bollerslev,et al.  Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity , 1986 .

[32]  Paolo Agnolucci,et al.  Volatility in crude oil futures: A comparison of the predictive ability of GARCH and implied volatility models , 2009 .

[33]  Masao Fukushima,et al.  CAViaR-based forecast for oil price risk , 2009 .

[34]  Tae-Hwy Lee.  Spread and volatility in spot and forward exchange rates , 1994 .

[35]  Juri Marcucci.  Forecasting Stock Market Volatility with Regime-Switching GARCH Models , 2005 .

[36]  P. Phillips.  Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression , 1988 .

[37]  Christopher G. Lamoureux,et al.  Persistence in Variance, Structural Change, and the GARCH Model , 1990 .

[38]  Rania Jammazi,et al.  The effects of crude oil shocks on stock market shifts behaviour: A regime switching approach , 2009 .

[39]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[40]  P. Phillips,et al.  Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? , 1992 .

[41]  Peter F. Christoffersen.  Evaluating Interval Forecasts , 1998 .

[42]  Franz C. Palm,et al.  Simple diagnostic procedures for modeling financial time series , 1997 .

[43]  Victor K. Ng,et al.  Fundamentals and Volatility: Storage, Spreads, and the Dynamics of Metals Prices , 1994 .

[44]  Ebenezer Asem,et al.  Comparison of historically simulated VaR: Evidence from oil prices , 2008 .

[45]  B. Lin,et al.  On the distribution and conditional heteroscedasticity in Taiwan stock prices , 2000 .

[46]  Value at risk and conditional extreme value theory via markov regime switching models , 2008 .

[47]  A. McNeil,et al.  Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: an extreme value approach , 2000 .

[48]  Tae-Hwy Lee,et al.  Forecasting volatility: A reality check based on option pricing, utility function, value-at-risk, and predictive likelihood , 2004 .

[49]  James D. Hamilton,et al.  Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity and changes in regime , 1994 .

[50]  I. Marsh,et al.  High‐frequency Markov switching models in the foreign exchange market , 2000 .

[51]  Victor K. Ng,et al.  Price dynamics in refined petroleum spot and futures markets , 1996 .

[52]  Minh-Vuong Vo,et al.  Regime-switching stochastic volatility: Evidence from the crude oil market , 2009 .

[53]  C. Granger,et al.  Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing , 1987 .

[54]  B. Jacobsen,et al.  Striking Oil: Another Puzzle? , 2003 .

[55]  Ming-Yuan Leon Li *,et al.  Estimating value-at-risk via Markov switching ARCH models – an empirical study on stock index returns , 2004 .

[56]  W. Fong,et al.  Basis variations and regime shifts in the oil futures market , 2003 .

[57]  Franz C. Palm,et al.  The message in weekly exchange rates in the European Monetary System: mean reversion , 1993 .

[58]  Susan Thomas,et al.  Selection of Value-at-Risk models , 2003 .

[59]  Carol Alexander,et al.  Normal Mixture Garch(1,1): Applications to Exchange Rate Modelling , 2004 .

[60]  Michael J. Dueker.  Markov Switching in GARCH Processes and Mean-Reverting Stock-Market Volatility , 1997 .

[61]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  Modeling and forecasting petroleum futures volatility , 2006 .

[62]  Marc S. Paolella,et al.  Mixed Normal Conditional Heteroskedasticity , 2004 .

[63]  Lee C. Adkins,et al.  Price risk in the NYMEX energy complex: An extreme value approach , 2005 .

[64]  T. Brailsford,et al.  An evaluation of volatility forecasting techniques , 1996 .

[65]  Stephen Gray.  Modeling the Conditional Distribution of Interest Rates as a Regime-Switching Process , 1996 .