Designing Intelligent Robots--On the Implications of Embodiment (特集 実世界の性質を利用した知覚と制御)

Traditionally, in robotics, artificial intelligence, and neuroscience, there has been a focus on the study of the control or the neural system itself. Recently there has been an increasing interest into the notion of embodiment in all disciplines dealing with intelligent behavior, including psychology, philosophy, and linguistics. In this paper, we explore the far-reaching and often surprising implications of this concept. While embodiment has often been used in its trivial meaning, i.e. „intelligence requires a body“, there are deeper and more important consequences, concerned with connecting brain, body, and environment, or more generally with the relation between physical and information (neural, control) processes. It turns out that, for example, robots designed by exploiting embodiment are frequently simpler, more robust and adaptive than those based on the classical control paradigm. Often, morphology and materials can take over some of the functions normally attributed to control, a phenomenon called “morphological computation”. It can be shown that through the embodied interaction with the environment, in particular through sensory-motor coordination, information structure is induced in the sensory data, thus facilitating perception and learning. A number of case studies are presented to illustrate the concept of embodiment. We conclude with some speculations about potential lessons for robotics.

[1]  Masahiro Shimizu,et al.  A Modular Robot That Self-Assembles , 2006, IAS.

[2]  Michael Gasser,et al.  The Development of Embodied Cognition: Six Lessons from Babies , 2005, Artificial Life.

[3]  R. Blickhan,et al.  Brain or muscles , 2003 .

[4]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  “ Cheap ” Underwater Locomotion : Morphological Properties and Behavioral Diversity , 2005 .

[5]  R. Full,et al.  The role of the mechanical system in control: a hypothesis of self-stabilization in hexapedal runners , 1999 .

[6]  Wenwei Yu,et al.  Mutual Adaptation in a Prosthetics Application , 2003, Embodied Artificial Intelligence.

[7]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Morphological Computation: Connecting Body, Brain, and Environment (特集:ロボティクスと神経科学) , 2005 .

[8]  S. Gallagher How the body shapes the mind , 2005 .

[9]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Sensing through body dynamics , 2006, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[10]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Morpho-functional Machines: Basics and Research Issues , 2003 .

[11]  Luc Steels,et al.  Towards a theory of emergent functionality , 1991 .

[12]  A. Clark An embodied cognitive science? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Pierre Poirier,et al.  Chapter 33 – Embodied Categorization , 2005 .

[15]  Martin Buehler Dynamic locomotion with one, four and six-legged robots (特集「ロコモーション」) , 2002 .

[16]  I. Shimoyama,et al.  Design and performance of a micro-sized biomorphic compound eye with a scanning retina , 2000, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[17]  Tom Ziemke Situated and Embodied Cognition , 2001, Cognitive Systems Research.

[18]  Michael L. Anderson Embodied Cognition: A field guide , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[19]  Wenwei Yu,et al.  Morpho-functional machine: robotics approach of amoeba model based on vibrating potential method , 1998 .

[20]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.