Kinetic Studies on Petrographic Components of Coal in Batch Flotation Operation

ABSTRACT In the present paper, an attempt was made to study the kinetic behavior of different types of maceral during flotation of a washery grade-IV type of coking coal. Three important operational variables, viz. collector dose (kg/ton), frother dose (kg/ton), and feed solid concentrations (%), were varied, and their effects on the response parameters like recoveries of ash and petrographic components, viz. vitrinite (V), liptinite (L), and inertinite (I), were evaluated. A first-order flotation kinetic equation was fitted for the batch test data for evaluating the rate of flotation (k) of coal components. Use of a three-level Box-Behnken factorial design was adopted to minimize the number of experiments and modeling of response parameters in batch coal flotation. The obtained results were evaluated with quadratic programming to develop second-order regression equations. For understanding of the influence of interactional effects, response surface methodology (RSM) approach was adopted. Taking advantages of the quadratic programming, it was observed that recovery of 100% vitrinite was obtained without collector, however, with frother dosage and feed solid concentration of 0.75kg/ton and 5%, respectively. Similarly, minimum ultimate recovery of ash and inertinite component was achieved at intermediate range of reagent dosages and pulp density (collector ≡ 0.40–0.45kg/ton, frother ≡ 0.40–0.45kg/ton, and feed solid concentration of 9–10%). The influence of these process variables of the batch coal flotation on ultimate recovery (R∞) and rate constant (k) values of maceral components are discussed critically in this paper.

[1]  Organic petrology , 2015 .

[2]  R. Loison Coke: Quality and Production , 2013 .

[3]  Bruce Firth,et al.  Flotation process diagnostics and modelling by coal grain analysis , 2006 .

[4]  J. Hower,et al.  Coal microlithotype response to froth flotation in selected Western Kentucky coals , 1984 .

[5]  L. Stock,et al.  Density separation of alkylated coal macerals , 1987 .

[6]  B. Cardott,et al.  Classification of huminite—ICCP System 1994 , 2005 .

[7]  E. C. Çilek Estimation of flotation kinetic parameters by considering interactions of the operating variables , 2004 .

[8]  B. J. Arnold,et al.  The hydrophobicity of coal macerals , 1989 .

[9]  V. V. Hinsberg,et al.  WILLS’ MINERAL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF ORE TREATMENT AND MINERAL RECOVERY Seventh edition, by B.A. Wills and T.J. Napier-Munn. (2006) Butterworth-Heinemann (Elsevier), Burlington, Massachusetts. 456 p. ISBN: 978-0-7506-4450-1. $59.95. , 2008 .

[10]  G. Dyrkacz,et al.  Use of continuous flow centrifugation techniques for coal maceral separation. 2. Multiple density fractionations of coals , 1992 .

[11]  G. E. Agar,et al.  Flotation rate measurements to optimize an operating circuit , 1998 .

[12]  F. F. Aplan,et al.  Model Discrimination in the Flotation of a Porphyry Copper Ore , 1985 .

[13]  A. K. Mukherjee,et al.  Vitrinite Maceral Separation Using Column Flotation , 2018 .

[14]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[15]  E. Jorjani,et al.  The effect of particle size on coal maceral group's separation using flotation , 2013 .

[16]  Shobhana Dey,et al.  Split and collectorless flotation to medium coking coal fines for multi-product zero waste concept , 2007 .

[17]  H. S. Pareek International Committee For Coal and Organic Petrology - ICCP: The 50th ICCP Meeting , 1999 .

[18]  Rick Honaker,et al.  Coal maceral separation using column flotation , 1996 .

[19]  E. Horwitz,et al.  Separation of coal macerals , 1980 .

[20]  Jose F. L. de Oliveira,et al.  Kinetics of pyrochlore flotation from Araxá mineral deposits , 2001 .