THE EFFECT OF PREY AND PREDATOR DENSITIES ON WOLF PREDATION

Predator kills rate (i.e., kills per predator per time) is routinely presupposed to depend exclusively on prey density. However, per capita rates of killing may typically depend on the density of both prey and predator. Unfortunately, our perception of many ecological phenomena may be limited by the inappropriate assumption that kill rates do not depend on predator density. One of many ways to represent the influence of predator density is ratio-dependent predation, where kill rate depends on the ratio of prey to predator rather than the actual numbers of prey and predator. Determining the role of ratio dependency in predation theory has been contentious. Assessments of the influence of predator density on kill rate have been primarily limited to theoretical considerations, indirect evidence, and simplified laboratory demonstrations. We directly observed the influence of both prey and predator density on kill rates in an unmanipulated terrestrial system of large mammals— wolves ( Canis lupus) and moose (Alces alces). Predator density explained more variation in kill rate than did prey density (R 2 5 0.36 vs. R 2 5 0.17, respectively). Moreover, the ratio-dependent model greatly outperformed the prey-dependent model. Nevertheless, the ratio-dependent model failed to explain most of the variation in kill rate (i.e., R 2 5 0.34). The ratio-dependent-prey-dependent controversy may dissipate with greater appreciation and acknowledgment that both models may be overly simplistic, both have value, and neither deserves primacy.

[1]  L. Slobodkin,et al.  Community Structure, Population Control, and Competition , 1960, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Stan Boutin,et al.  Power analysis of wolf-moose functional responses , 1999 .

[3]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  A Model for Tropic Interaction , 1975 .

[4]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Predators that Benefit Prey and Prey that Harm Predators: Unusual Effects of Interacting Foraging Adaptation , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[5]  L. Ginzburg,et al.  The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  W. B. Davis,et al.  The wolves of Mount McKinley , 1944 .

[7]  S. Fretwell,et al.  The Regulation of Plant Communities by the Food Chains Exploiting Them , 2015 .

[8]  F. Messier,et al.  UNGULATE POPULATION MODELS WITH PREDATION: A CASE STUDY WITH THE NORTH AMERICAN MOOSE' , 1994 .

[9]  M. Holyoak.  Effects of nutrient enrichment on predator–prey metapopulation dynamics , 2000 .

[10]  Sigurd F. Olson.  Organization and Range of the Pack , 1938 .

[11]  R. Arditi,et al.  Variation in Plankton Densities Among Lakes: A Case for Ratio-Dependent Predation Models , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[12]  A. Gutierrez.  Physiological Basis of Ratio-Dependent Predator-Prey Theory: The Metabolic Pool Model as a Paradigm , 1992 .

[13]  Mario Markus,et al.  Populations under Periodically and Randomly Varying Growth Conditions , 1987 .

[14]  C. Elton,et al.  The Ten-Year Cycle in Numbers of the Lynx in Canada , 1942 .

[15]  Rolf O. Peterson,et al.  Population limitation and the wolves of Isle Royale , 1998 .

[16]  L. Slobodkin.  A Summary of the Special Feature and Comments on Its Theoretical Context and Importance , 1992 .

[17]  R. Peterson.  WOLF–MOOSE INTERACTION ON ISLE ROYALE: THE END OF NATURAL REGULATION? , 1999 .

[18]  R. Arditi,et al.  Underestimation of mutual interference of predators , 1990, Oecologia.

[19]  S. Goldhor.  Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[20]  P. Abrams.  Why Predation Rate Should Not be Proportional to Predator Density , 1993 .

[21]  C. S. Holling.  The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .

[22]  R. Peterson,et al.  Ecological Studies of Wolves on Isle Royale Annual Report 1997 – 98 * by , 1998 .

[23]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Graphical Representation and Stability Conditions of Predator-Prey Interactions , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[24]  V. Volterra.  Fluctuations in the Abundance of a Species considered Mathematically , 1926, Nature.

[25]  G. Polis,et al.  Food Web Complexity and Community Dynamics , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[26]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  A MODEL FOR TROPHIC INTERACTION , 1975 .

[27]  M. Bhaskara Rao,et al.  Model Selection and Inference , 2000, Technometrics.

[28]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an Alternative , 2000 .

[29]  Paul D. Spencer,et al.  Optimal harvesting of fish populations with nonlinear rates of predation and autocorrelated environmental variability , 1997 .

[30]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An introduction to the bootstrap , 1993 .

[31]  Roger Arditi,et al.  Ratio-Dependent Predation: An Abstraction That Works , 1995 .

[32]  M. Hassell.  The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[33]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities , 1988 .

[34]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  The Fallacies of "Ratio‐Dependent" Predation , 1994 .

[35]  D. Rogers,et al.  Random search and insect population models , 1972 .

[36]  John D. Reeve,et al.  Predation and bark beetle dynamics , 1997, Oecologia.

[37]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[38]  L. David Mech,et al.  The Wolves of Isle Royale , 2002 .

[39]  J. Beddington,et al.  Mutual Interference Between Parasites or Predators and its Effect on Searching Efficiency , 1975 .

[40]  K. Stollery,et al.  The economic effects of biological predation: theory and application to the case of the north-east Atlantic minke whale's (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) consumption of fish , 1994 .

[41]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Management of Multispecies Fisheries , 1979, Science.

[42]  M. Hassell,et al.  New Inductive Population Model for Insect Parasites and its Bearing on Biological Control , 1969, Nature.

[43]  R. Arditi,et al.  Empirical Evidence of the Role of Heterogeneity in Ratio‐Dependent Consumption , 1993 .

[44]  P. Abrams.  Anomalous Predictions of Ratio-Dependent Models of Predation , 1997 .

[45]  C. Huffaker.  Experimental studies on predation : dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations , 1958 .

[46]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Invulnerable Prey and the Paradox of Enrichment , 1996 .

[47]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Consequences of Ratio‐Dependent Predation for Steady‐State Properties of Ecosystems , 1992 .

[48]  R. Peterson,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Isle Royale Wolves, 1975–1986 , 1988 .

[49]  R. Arditi,et al.  Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio-Dependence , 1989 .

[50]  H. B. Wilson,et al.  Reinterpreting space, time lags, and functional responses in ecological models. , 2000, Science.

[51]  C. S. Holling.  The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density , 1966 .

[52]  H. I. Freedman,et al.  Persistence in predator-prey systems with ratio-dependent predator influence , 1993 .

[53]  A. J. Lotka.  Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.

[54]  R. Arditi,et al.  Functional responses and heterogeneities: an experimental test with cladocerans , 1991 .

[55]  L. Oksanen,et al.  Exploitation Ecosystems in Gradients of Primary Productivity , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[56]  Frederick E. Smith,et al.  Experimental Methods in Population Dynamics: A Critique , 1952 .

[57]  B. Sæther,et al.  Dynamics of a harvested moose population in a variable environment , 1999 .

[58]  Lev R. Ginzburg,et al.  Assuming reproduction to be a function of consumption raises doubts about some popular predator–prey models , 1998 .

[59]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Must top predators be culled for the sake of fisheries? , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[60]  Jeremy S. Collie,et al.  Modeling predator-prey dynamics in a fluctuating environment , 1994 .

[61]  Craig A. Stow,et al.  Fitting Predator-Prey Models to Time Series with Observation Errors , 1994 .

[62]  R Arditi,et al.  The biological control paradox. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  R. Peterson,et al.  Effects of Population Density and Pack Size on the Foraging Ecology of Gray Wolves , 1993 .

[64]  E. O. Garton,et al.  DETECTION OF MOOSE IN MIDWINTER FROM FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT OVER DENSE FOREST COVER , 1993 .

[65]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Predator-Prey Theory and Management of Multispecies Fisheries , 1994 .

[66]  M. Rosenzweig.  Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time , 1971, Science.