Event-Related Potentials and Language Processing: A Brief Overview

Since the publication of the first papers on event-related brain potentials (ERP) and language in the 1980s, the field of electrophysiology of language has evolved a great deal. This article is a brief overview of ERPs and languageprocessing research. It discusses how ERPs are derived, provides the pros and cons of using ERPs for language-processing research, and gives a summary of the major ERP components relevant to research on speech perception (mismatch negativity), word and sentence comprehension (N400, left anterior negativity, P600), and word production (lateralized readiness potential, N200). Additionally, it addresses current controversies concerning the interpretation of these components. Applications of the ERP technique are illustrated with research on first and second language acquisition, bilingualism, and aphasia.

[1]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEASURES OF SENSITIVITY TO VIOLATIONS IN SECOND LANGUAGE GRAMMAR: An Event-Related Potential Investigation , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[2]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[3]  Petra Burkhardt,et al.  Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2006, Brain and Language.

[4]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The neurocognition of syntactic processing , 1999 .

[5]  J. Grainger,et al.  An Electrophysiological Study of the Effects of Orthographic Neighborhood Size on Printed Word Perception , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[7]  D. Deacon,et al.  Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[8]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  How the brain solves the binding problem for language: a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[9]  T. Carrell,et al.  Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Second Language Interferes with Word Production in Fluent Bilinguals: Brain Potential and Functional Imaging Evidence , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  S Makeig,et al.  Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Processing Syntactic Relations in Language and Music: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  M Turennout,et al.  Brain activity during speaking: from syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. , 1998, Science.

[14]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Impact of Proficiency on Syntactic Second-language Processing of German and Italian: Evidence from Event-related Potentials , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[17]  G. Dehaene-Lambertz,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for automatic phonetic processing in neonates , 2001, Neuroreport.

[18]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Verb Argument Structure in Parsing and Interpretation: Evidence from wh-Questions , 1995 .

[19]  Robert Kluender,et al.  Subjacency as a processing phenomenon , 1993 .

[20]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Distinct Neurophysiological Patterns Reflecting Aspects of Syntactic Complexity and Syntactic Repair , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[21]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[22]  S. Hillyard,et al.  The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[23]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[24]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  Herman H.J. Kolk,et al.  Disorders of Syntax in Aphasia: Linguistic-Descriptive and Processing Approaches , 1998 .

[27]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Psychobiology: Speech sounds learned by sleeping newborns , 2002, Nature.

[29]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses , 1997, Nature.

[30]  S. Makeig,et al.  Mining event-related brain dynamics , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and human language , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  H. Neville,et al.  Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[34]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[35]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE: Dissociable ERP profiles for processing rules vs instances in a cognitive sequencing task , 2000 .

[36]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  M. I. Núñez-Peña,et al.  P600 related to rule violation in an arithmetic task. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling event-related responses in the brain , 2005, NeuroImage.

[40]  Marta Kutas,et al.  When temporal terms belie conceptual order , 1998, Nature.

[41]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[42]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  When Heuristics Clash with Parsing Routines: ERP Evidence for Conflict Monitoring in Sentence Perception , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  E. Kaan,et al.  Repair, Revision, and Complexity in Syntactic Analysis: An Electrophysiological Differentiation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Petra B. Schumacher,et al.  The Syntax–Discourse Interface: Representing and interpreting dependency , 2005 .

[45]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[46]  E. Kaan,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for serial sentence processing: a comparison between non-preferred and ungrammatical continuations. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[47]  C. Ponton,et al.  Central Auditory Plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 Complex after Speech-Sound Training , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[48]  E. Gibson The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .

[49]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: the processing of German WH-questions , 2002 .

[50]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  A. Friederici,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  F. Macar,et al.  An event-related potential analysis of incongruity in music and other non-linguistic contexts. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[53]  E. Donchin Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review , 1978 .

[54]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  M. Kutas,et al.  Psycholinguistics Electrified II (1994–2005) , 2006 .

[56]  A. Friederici,et al.  Localization of early syntactic processes in frontal and temporal cortical areas: A magnetoencephalographic study , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[57]  Phillip J Holcomb,et al.  Semantic integration in videos of real-world events: an electrophysiological investigation. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[58]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Levels of representation in the electrophysiology of speech perception , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[60]  A. Friederici,et al.  Processing a second language: Late learners''comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related b , 2001 .

[61]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[62]  A. Friederici Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[63]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during implicit picture naming. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[64]  Kees de Bot,et al.  The Multilingual Lexicon: Modelling Selection and Control. , 2004 .

[65]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Parsing of Sentences in a Language with Varying Word Order: Word-by-Word Variations of Processing Demands Are Revealed by Event-Related Brain Potentials ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1998 .

[66]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Real-time semantic compensation in patients with agrammatic comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence for multiple-route plasticity , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Spoken Sentence Comprehension in Aphasia: Event-related Potential Evidence for a Lexical Integration Deficit , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[68]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker , 1999 .

[69]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[70]  E Hennighausen,et al.  Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[71]  M. Kutas,et al.  Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[72]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[73]  E. Schröger,et al.  Differential Contribution of Frontal and Temporal Cortices to Auditory Change Detection: fMRI and ERP Results , 2002, NeuroImage.

[74]  M. Kutas,et al.  ERPs and Domain Specificity: Beating a Straw Horse , 1998 .

[75]  R. Näätänen The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[76]  C. Petten,et al.  Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies , 2006, Brain and Language.

[77]  Laurie A. Stowe,et al.  Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location , 1986 .

[78]  Laurie A. Stowe,et al.  Imaging the processing of a second language: Effects of maturation and proficiency on the neural processes involved , 2005 .

[79]  A. Dale,et al.  Distinct Patterns of Neural Modulation during the Processing of Conceptual and Syntactic Anomalies , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[80]  C. Petten A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials , 1993 .

[81]  Edith Kaan,et al.  Processing bare quantifiers in discourse , 2007, Brain Research.

[82]  A Hahne,et al.  What's Different in Second-Language Processing? Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[83]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Thematic role assignment in patients with Broca's aphasia: Sentence–picture matching electrified , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[84]  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Executive Control in Bilingual Language Processing , 2006, Language Learning.

[85]  A. Friederici,et al.  First-Pass versus Second-Pass Parsing Processes in a Wernicke's and a Broca's Aphasic: Electrophysiological Evidence for a Double Dissociation , 1998, Brain and Language.

[86]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Syntactic and Semantic Factors in Processing Gender Agreement in Hebrew: Evidence from ERPs and Eye Movements ☆ , 2001 .

[87]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Semantic Integration in Sentences and Discourse: Evidence from the N400 , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[88]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[89]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[90]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[91]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[92]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[93]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  An ERP Study of Second Language Learning after Childhood: Effects of Proficiency , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[94]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Auditory Cortex Accesses Phonological Categories: An MEG Mismatch Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[95]  T F Münte,et al.  Brain Potentials in the Processing of Complex Sentences: An ERP Study of Control and Raising Constructions , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[96]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Word-category violations in patients with Broca’s aphasia: An ERP study , 2005, Brain and Language.

[97]  C. Phillips,et al.  ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[98]  H. Kolk,et al.  Late positivities in unusual situations , 2007, Brain and Language.

[99]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Brain potentials to native and non-native speech contrasts in 7- and 11-month-old American infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[100]  M. Kutas,et al.  Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[101]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Novice Learners, Longitudinal Designs, and Event-Related Potentials: A Means for Exploring the Neurocognition of Second Language Processing. , 2006 .

[102]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II. Effects of word type and semantic priming , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.