Dealing with Uncertainty in GHG Inventories: How to Go About It?

The assessment of greenhouse gases emitted to and removed from the atmosphere is high on both political and scientific agendas. Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Parties to the Convention publish annual or periodic national inventories of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. Policymakers use these inventories to develop strategies and policies for emission reductions and to track the progress of these policies. However, greenhouse gas inventories (whether at the global, national, corporate, or other level) contain uncertainty for a variety of reasons, and these uncertainties have important scientific and policy implications. For scientific, political, and economic reasons it is important to deal with the uncertainty of emissions estimates proactively. Proper treatment of uncertainty affects everything from our understanding of the physical system to the economics of mitigation strategies and the politics of mitigation agreements. A comprehensive and consistent understanding of, and a framework for dealing with, the uncertainty of emissions estimates should have a large impact on the functioning and effectiveness of the Kyoto Protocol and its successor. This chapter attempts to pull together relevant fragments of knowledge, allowing us to get a better picture of how to go about dealing with the uncertainty in greenhouse gas inventories.

[1]  D. Schimel,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases , 1999 .

[2]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Technical Summary , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[3]  Yuri Ermoliev,et al.  Markets for Tradeable Emission and Ambient Permits: A Dynamic Approach , 2000 .

[4]  J. Penman,et al.  Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories CH 4 Emissions from Solid Waste Disposal 419 CH 4 EMISSIONS FROM SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL , 2022 .

[5]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2015 .

[6]  E. Dlugokencky,et al.  Atmospheric chemistry and greenhouse gases , 2001 .

[7]  B. McCarl,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in U.S. Agriculture and Forestry , 2001, Science.

[8]  B. McCarl,et al.  Climate change. Greenhouse gas mitigation in U.S. agriculture and forestry. , 2001, Science.

[9]  V. Dachuk.  Looking Behind the Kyoto Protocol: Can Integral Transforms Provide Help in Dealing with the Verification Issue? , 2002 .

[10]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[11]  H. Hudz,et al.  Verification Times Underlying the Kyoto Protocol: Consideration of Risk , 2002 .

[12]  Mykola Gusti,et al.  Carbon Management: A New Dimension of Future Carbon Research , 2002 .

[13]  Juliane Kokott,et al.  Climate Protection Strategies for the 21 st Century : Kyoto and beyond , 2003 .

[14]  Xander Olsthoorn,et al.  The role of scientific uncertainty in compliance with the Kyoto Protocol to the climate change convention , 2003 .

[15]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Carbon Trading with Imperfectly Observable Emissions , 2003 .

[16]  F. Wagner,et al.  Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2003 .

[17]  J. Hansen,et al.  Defusing the global warming time bomb. , 2004, Scientific American.

[18]  Joanna Horabik,et al.  Preparatory Signal Detection for Annex I Countries under the Kyoto Protocol - A Lesson for the Post-Kyoto Policy Process , 2004 .

[19]  Attainability Analysis of the DICE Model , 2005 .

[20]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry , 2007 .

[21]  Accounting for Climate Change: Introduction , 2007 .

[22]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  T. M. White.  Uncertainty in Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2007 .

[24]  Sanna Syri,et al.  Extension of EU Emissions Trading Scheme to Other Sectors and Gases: Consequences for Uncertainty of Total Tradable Amount , 2007 .

[25]  Joanna Horabik,et al.  Compliance and Emissions Trading under the Kyoto Protocol: Rules for Uncertain Inventories , 2007 .

[26]  Processing National CO2 Inventory Emissions Data and their Total Uncertainty Estimates , 2007 .

[27]  Zbigniew Nahorski,et al.  Accounting for Climate Change. Uncertainties in Greenhouse Gas Inventories - Verification, Compliance, and Trading , 2007 .

[28]  Sten Nilsson,et al.  Prior to Economic Treatment of Emissions and Their Uncertainties Under the Kyoto Protocol: Scientific Uncertainties That Must Be Kept in Mind , 2007 .

[29]  J. Cohen,et al.  Practical Policy Applications of Uncertainty Analysis for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2007 .

[30]  Zbigniew Nahorski,et al.  Accounting for Climate Change , 2021, Academia Letters.

[31]  Consistency between Long-term Climate Target and Short-term Abatement Policy. Attainability Analysis Technique , 2008 .

[32]  Z. Nahorski,et al.  Comparison of preparatory signal analysis techniques for consideration in the (post-)Kyoto policy process , 2010 .

[33]  K. Hamal.  Reporting GHG Emissions: Change in Uncertainty and Its Relevance for Detection of Emission Changes , 2010 .