Time integrator agnostic charge conserving finite element PIC

Developing particle-in-cell (PIC) methods using finite element basis sets, and without auxiliary divergence cleaning methods, was a long standing problem until recently. It was shown that if consistent spatial basis functions are used, one can indeed create a methodology that was charge conserving, albeit using a leap-frog time stepping method. While this is a significant advance, leap frog schemes are only conditionally stable and time step sizes are closely tied to the underlying mesh. Ideally, to take full advantage of advances in finite element methods (FEMs), one needs a charge conserving PIC methodology that is agnostic to the time stepping method. This is the principal contribution of this paper. In what follows, we shall develop this methodology, prove that both charge and Gauss' laws are discretely satisfied at every time step, provide the necessary details to implement this methodology for both the wave equation FEM and Maxwell Solver FEM, and finally demonstrate its efficacy on a suite of test problems. The method will be demonstrated by single particle evolution, non-neutral beams with space-charge, and adiabatic expansion of a neutral plasma, where the debye length has been resolved, and real mass ratios are used.

[1]  Explicit structure-preserving geometric particle-in-cell algorithm in curvilinear orthogonal coordinate systems and its applications to whole-device 6D kinetic simulations of tokamak physics , 2021 .

[2]  R. Lemke,et al.  Three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulation study of a relativistic magnetron , 1999 .

[3]  Martin Campos Pinto,et al.  Charge-conserving FEM–PIC schemes on general grids☆ , 2014 .

[4]  R. Marchand,et al.  PTetra, a Tool to Simulate Low Orbit Satellite–Plasma Interaction , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[5]  Peter Monk,et al.  Finite Element Methods for Maxwell's Equations , 2003 .

[6]  O. C. Zienkiewicz A new look at the newmark, houbolt and other time stepping formulas. A weighted residual approach , 1977 .

[7]  Luis Chacón,et al.  An energy- and charge-conserving, implicit, electrostatic particle-in-cell algorithm , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[8]  Hong Qin,et al.  Geometric integration of the Vlasov-Maxwell system with a variational particle-in-cell scheme , 2012, 1401.6723.

[9]  B. Shanker,et al.  UNCONDITIONALLY STABLE TIME STEPPING METHOD FOR MIXED FINITE ELEMENT MAXWELL SOLVERS , 2020, Progress In Electromagnetics Research C.

[10]  J. Verboncoeur Particle simulation of plasmas: review and advances , 2005 .

[11]  Hong Qin,et al.  The geometric theory of charge conservation in particle-in-cell simulations , 2020, Journal of Plasma Physics.

[12]  Katharina Kormann,et al.  Energy-conserving time propagation for a geometric particle-in-cell Vlasov-Maxwell solver , 2019, ArXiv.

[13]  John P. Verboncoeur,et al.  Conformal Electromagnetic Particle in Cell: A Review , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[14]  John R. Cary,et al.  Application of Dey-Mittra conformal boundary algorithm to 3D electromagnetic modeling , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[15]  Carretera de Valencia,et al.  The finite element method in electromagnetics , 2000 .

[16]  Fernando L. Teixeira,et al.  Exact charge-conserving scatter-gather algorithm for particle-in-cell simulations on unstructured grids: A geometric perspective , 2014, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[17]  B. Shanker,et al.  A Set of Benchmark Tests for Validation of 3-D Particle in Cell Methods , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[18]  B Shahine,et al.  Particle in cell simulation of laser-accelerated proton beams for radiation therapy. , 2002, Medical physics.

[19]  Claus-Dieter Munz,et al.  Divergence Correction Techniques for Maxwell Solvers Based on a Hyperbolic Model , 2000 .

[20]  V. F. Kovalev,et al.  Analytic solutions to the Vlasov equations for expanding plasmas. , 2003, Physical review letters.