The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores.

BACKGROUND Previous studies showed a correlation between mean withdrawal times during screening colonoscopy and polyp/neoplasia detection rates. OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of a monitoring and feedback program on withdrawal times, polyp/neoplasia detection rates, and patient satisfaction. DESIGN Comparison of retrospective and prospective data. SETTING Teaching hospital. PATIENTS Asymptomatic adults undergoing screening colonoscopy. INTERVENTIONS Monitoring and feedback program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Withdrawal times, polyp and neoplasia detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 850 screening colonoscopies, recording withdrawal times, polyp findings, and patient satisfaction scores. All procedures were performed by 10 experienced gastroenterologists who were then informed that periodic confidential monitoring and feedback of withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and satisfaction scores would be started. We then prospectively collected data on another 541 screening colonoscopies. We compared pre- and postmonitoring outcome measures. RESULTS Overall, after monitoring had begun, there was an increase in mean withdrawal times (from 6.57 to 8.07 minutes; P < .0001), and polyp detection rates (from 33.1% to 38.1%; P = .04, significance removed by Bonferroni correction). Nine of the 10 endoscopists increased their withdrawal times significantly. There was a small, nonsignificant increase in the neoplasia detection rate (from 19.6% to 22.7%; P = .17), but no significant change in mean satisfaction scores. Across endoscopists, there was a moderate correlation (r = 0.63; P = .04, significance removed by Bonferroni correction) between withdrawal times and polyp detection rates, but not between withdrawal times and satisfaction scores. LIMITATIONS No randomization, possible response bias, confounding of intervention effects, and sample size limitations. CONCLUSIONS Monitoring and feedback are associated with increases in mean withdrawal times and polyp detection rates, but not patient satisfaction scores. Neoplasia detection rates showed a statistically nonsignificant trend toward an increase.

[1]  D. Rex,et al.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. , 2000, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[2]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Polyp Miss Rate Determined by Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[3]  C. Schmitt,et al.  Clues to patient dissatisfaction with conscious sedation for colonoscopy. , 1994, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[4]  R. Barclay,et al.  Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. , 2008, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[5]  A. Zinsmeister,et al.  Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  B. Petersen,et al.  Evaluation of Polyp Detection in Relation to Procedure Time of Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy , 2004, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[7]  R. Kozarek,et al.  Patient satisfaction scores for endoscopic procedures: impact of a survey-collection method. , 2007, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[8]  A. Sonnenberg,et al.  Patterns of endoscopy in the United States: analysis of data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the National Endoscopic Database. , 2008, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[9]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Endoscopist Can Be More Powerful than Age and Male Gender in Predicting Adenoma Detection at Colonoscopy , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[10]  J. Johanson,et al.  Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Amitabh Chak,et al.  Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy , 2006, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[12]  P. Boston,et al.  Listening to the customer: implementing a patient satisfaction measurement system. , 1994, Gastroenterology Nursing.

[13]  N. Nickl,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Assess and Predict Satisfaction and Poor Tolerance Among Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Procedures , 2005, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[14]  R. Chuttani,et al.  Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[15]  Douglas K. Rex,et al.  Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: Recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer , 2002 .

[16]  B. Weber,et al.  Patient satisfaction with conscious sedation for ambulatory colonoscopy in a community hospital. , 1997, Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates.

[17]  Jane C. Johnson,et al.  Predictors of patient cooperation during gastrointestinal endoscopy. , 1997, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[18]  G Cohen,et al.  Age and health status in a patient satisfaction survey. , 1996, Social science & medicine.

[19]  B. Denis,et al.  Quality assurance and gastrointestinal endoscopy: an audit of 500 colonoscopic procedures. , 2004, Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique.

[20]  G. Harewood,et al.  Prospective assessment of the impact of feedback on colonoscopy performance , 2006, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[21]  D. Lieberman.  Colonoscopy: As Good as Gold? , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[22]  Perry Pickhardt,et al.  Location of Adenomas Missed by Optical Colonoscopy , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  A. Buchman.  Second Annual Snowbird Conference on Clinical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Intestinal Failure March 9–12, 2006 , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[24]  B. Petersen,et al.  Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time , 2006 .